No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 February 2009
In what has preceded I have travelled a good deal beyond Simonides. But I have done so in order to illustrate the fact that the remains of ancient lyric cannot be interpreted in isolation. I come back now to the extant fragments of Simonides.
page 114 note 1 For the form ṬαƲʋπṬρʋƳος (the word is not elsewhere found) compare кʋαƲοπṬρʋƳος in Cercidas (0x. Pap. 1082, p. 33, line 6). Wilamowitz, I now find, has discovered the Scholion.
page 114 note 2 I note a like malice of fortune in connexion with a statement in Sappho u. Simonides, p. 81. Wilamowitz there lays it down that ς for εις is an impossible form in an Aeolic poet. Among some recent Egyptian rubbish I can find for him, if he has not found it already, a certain example of ς (where εις would not scan) in a very good Aeolic poet indeed.
page 114 note 3 If Wilamowitz had written έσσεῖταɩ his line would have been one to which a metrical parallel could have been found in the Curetes Hymn.
page 114 note 4 I observe, in passing, that in Mr. Edmonds' Lyra Graeca it still appears, without comment, among the fragments of Alcaeus.
page 114 note 5 And perhaps the author of the Hymn of Curetes.
page 115 note 1 Alcman I. should, I believe, be written: Ṃоῖσ' ᾰƳε, Ṃоῖσα λỊƳεῖα, πολʋµµελές, αἰεƲαοιδέ µέλος ƲεοϰµòƲ ᾰρϰε παρσεƲοιν είδεƲ.
page 120 note 1 Cf. Alcaeus 50, κπος Ƴᾴρ κεøλαƲ κατίσϰ ει τÒƲ ϬƲ θµα θʋμƲ αἰτΙμεƲος and Pindar, Frag. 104d, Schroeder.
page 122 note 1 Mr. Edmonds (Lyra Graeca) still gives Xenocritus without comment.