Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:24:00.704Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Textual Emendation in a Fragment of Musonius Rufus: A Note on Contraception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Keith Hopkins
Keith Hopkins
Affiliation:
London School of Economics
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

IN the fourth book of Stobaeus’ Anthologium, in a section entitled, ‘The Virtue of Having Children’, there is preserved a passage from the writings of the first-century Roman knight and Stoic, Musonius Rufus. This passage is headed: ‘Whether all children born should be raised’,

Type
Research Article
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , May 1965 , pp. 72 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 72 note 1 The manuscript reading is given by Wachsmuth and Hense: sed alterum a rescripsit The editors’ reading was also accepted by J. Enoch Powell (‘Musonius Rufus’: … Archiv, für Papyrusfarschung xii [1937], 175)Google Scholar when he completed the fragmentary P. Harr 1; nor was this commented upon by A. Körte, ‘Literarische Texte’ …, ibid xiii (1939), 112.

page 72 note 2 Dioscorides, , De re medica 1. 77.Google Scholar 2; 3. 130; 3. 134. 2; Soranus, , Gynaecia 1. 60.Google Scholar

page 72 note 3 Soranus, , Gynaecia I. 61–62.Google Scholar

page 72 note 4 Hippocrates, , Epid. 1. 26, a.Google Scholar

page 73 note 1 Taeuber, I. B., The Population of Japan (Princeton, 1958), p. 272Google Scholar; Aries, P., ‘Sur les origines de la contraception en France’, Population viii (1953), p. 469.Google Scholar

page 73 note 2 Chrysostom, , In Ep. ad Rom., Homily 24. 4 (P.G. lx. 626).Google Scholar Diepgen, P., Die Frauenheil kunde der alten Welt (Munich, 1937), p. 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 73 note 3 Musonius, , fr. 15b; Stobaeus (Meineke), iii. 129.Google Scholar

page 73 note 4 e.g. Seneca, , ad Helviam 1. 16. 3Google Scholar; and in general cf. Hfihnel, R., ‘Der künstliche Abortus im Altertum’, Sudhoffs Archiv Gesch. Med. XX1X (1936), 224–55.Google Scholar

page 73 note 5 Dio 54. 16; 56.1–10; Suetonius, , Aug. 89.Google Scholar

page 73 note 6 D. 48. 8. 8 is an interpolation, cf. Biondi, B., Il diritto romano cristiano (Milan, 1952–4)iii PP. 487–8.Google Scholar

page 73 note 7 D. 47. 11.4; cf. D. 48. 19.39; and D. 48. 19. 38.5; cf. D. 48. 8. 3. 2.

page 74 note 1 D. 25. 4. 1 partus enim antequam edatur, mulieris est vel viscerum; D 35. 2. 9. 1 partus nondum editus homo non recte fuisse dicitur. Cf. D. 38. 8. 1. 8; 37. 97; 28. 6. 10. 1.

page 74 note 2 Ad. Nat. 1. 15. 3Google Scholar; cf. Apol. 9. 6Google Scholar; and Musonius Rufus, frag., 15b and Stobaeus (Meineke), iii. 129.Google Scholar

page 74 note 3 Germania 19.Google Scholar

page 74 note 4 Aristotle, , Hist. Animal. 583aGoogle Scholar; Pliny, , Nat. Hist. 24. 11Google Scholar; Soranus, , Gynaecia I. 61–62.Google Scholar

page 74 note 5 On the authenticity and authorship of the fragments of Musonius Rufus, cf. K. von Fritz, s.v. Musonius in R.-E.

page 74 note 6 I should like to thank Dr. G. Giangrande of King’s College, Cambridge, and Professor A. Wasserstein of Leicester for their help and encouragement.