Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-86b6f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-10T04:37:58.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Aristophanes Knights 413

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Herbert Richards
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Contributions
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , April 1903 , pp. 143 - 145
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1903

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 143 note 1 Stein seems to distinguish 1. 2 from the other passages, not making his meaning very clear, but probably thinking with Goodwin (Moods and Tenses, 238 and 443) that it means ‘these would prove to have been Cretans,’ i.e. would now prove, if we could go into it. It seems better to take this passage like the others.

page 143 note 2 Quoted as an instance by Mr Platt, in the Journal of Philology, Vol. 26, p. 87.Google Scholar

page 143 note 3 I hare noticed one or two examples in Pausanias (1. 9. 5: 8. 12. 7).

page 144 note 1 In Eur. Or. 1132 why does Dr. Goodwin (M. T. 508) make optative ? It is the indicative, like νεῖμεν Wasps 574, νεῖτε O.T. 1405. Xen. Cyn. 12. 22. (which he cites) is probably wrong.

page 145 note 1 I have taken this and one other passage from Mr. Gildersleeve's Syntax § 293.