Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-dlb68 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-19T04:45:04.082Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Brugmann's Indo-Germanic Grammar - Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der Indogermanischen Sprachen. Kurzgefasste Darstellung der Geschichte des Altindischen, Altiranischen (Avestischen und Altpersischen), Altarmenischen, Altgriechischen, Lateinischen, Umbrisch-Samnitischen, Altirischen, Gotischen, Althochdeutschen, Litanischen, und Altkirchenslavischen. Brugmann Von Karl, Ord. Professor der Indogerm-Sprach wissenschaft in Leipzig. Zweiter Band, Wortbildungslehre, Zweite Hälfte, erste Lieferung: Zahlwortbildung, Casusbildung der Nomina (nominal declination). Pronomina. Pp. 463–846. Strassburg. 1890. 10 Mk. - Id. Zweite (Schluss-) Lieferung. Verbale Stamenbildung und Flexion (Conjugation) pp. 847–1438, 1892. 14 Mk. - Id. (Translation) Morphology, part II. Numerals, inflexion of nouns and pronouns. Translated from the German by R. Seymour Conway, M.A. and W. H. D. Rouse, M.A. London. 1892. Pp. xii. 402. 12s. Gd.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

T. C. Snow
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 7 , Issue 9 , November 1893 , pp. 418 - 421
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1893

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 420 note 1 Dr. Brugmann does not acknowledge na for Indo-European, but only nā, n∂, n. When I referred to this question once before (Classical Review I. pp. 64, 65) I was wrong in refusing to accept the Asiatic evidence for ∂ and no-vowel as ultra-weak stages for ἳςτāμι, τíθημι, δíδωμι. But I am still convinced that Greek and Latin, taken jointly, prove the existence of a, ä, ao as less weak stages in the three verbs respectively. And in general I am not yet convinced that De Saussure's e- system does not apply to vowels of these types, although the difficulties are much greater than they seemed at first.

page 421 note 1 Including American. Licet omnia Italica pro Romanis habeam.