No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Brugmann's Indo-Germanic Grammar - Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der Indogermanischen Sprachen. Kurzgefasste Darstellung der Geschichte des Altindischen, Altiranischen (Avestischen und Altpersischen), Altarmenischen, Altgriechischen, Lateinischen, Umbrisch-Samnitischen, Altirischen, Gotischen, Althochdeutschen, Litanischen, und Altkirchenslavischen. Brugmann Von Karl, Ord. Professor der Indogerm-Sprach wissenschaft in Leipzig. Zweiter Band, Wortbildungslehre, Zweite Hälfte, erste Lieferung: Zahlwortbildung, Casusbildung der Nomina (nominal declination). Pronomina. Pp. 463–846. Strassburg. 1890. 10 Mk. - Id. Zweite (Schluss-) Lieferung. Verbale Stamenbildung und Flexion (Conjugation) pp. 847–1438, 1892. 14 Mk. - Id. (Translation) Morphology, part II. Numerals, inflexion of nouns and pronouns. Translated from the German by R. Seymour Conway, M.A. and W. H. D. Rouse, M.A. London. 1892. Pp. xii. 402. 12s. Gd.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
Abstract

- Type
- Book Review
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1893
References
page 420 note 1 Dr. Brugmann does not acknowledge na for Indo-European, but only nā, n∂, n. When I referred to this question once before (Classical Review I. pp. 64, 65) I was wrong in refusing to accept the Asiatic evidence for ∂ and no-vowel as ultra-weak stages for ἳςτāμι, τíθημι, δíδωμι. But I am still convinced that Greek and Latin, taken jointly, prove the existence of a, ä, ao as less weak stages in the three verbs respectively. And in general I am not yet convinced that De Saussure's e- system does not apply to vowels of these types, although the difficulties are much greater than they seemed at first.
page 421 note 1 Including American. Licet omnia Italica pro Romanis habeam.