Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:39:21.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Emendations of Cicero's Verrines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

W. Peterson
W. Peterson
Affiliation:
Mogill University, Montreal.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Contributions
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , May 1903 , pp. 198 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1903

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 198 note 1 I hope soon to deal with the MSS of the earlier books of the Verrines. Meanwhile I need only state here that the remaining folios of this portion of Par. 7775 (i.e. from Dolabellae occise ii, 1, § 90 to singu, for singulari, § 111) are accurately reproduced in Par. 7823. The two traditions agree verbatim et litteratim: they agree also in the division of sentences. This fact shonld be enough to elevate the authority of Par. 7823 above G1 G2 and Ld. At the foot of the folio which as I have already reported, the copyist completed with the letters singu, Claudius Puteanus has written Plurima hic desunt. Thereafter follow two blank pages, and then the text of Books IV, V. It is important to note that Par. 7823 or D, which is derived from what I take to have been the archetype, is known to have had affinity to the Codex Stephani (Zumpt, Praef. p. xii).

page 200 note 1 For the confusion of si, quia cp. Div. in Caec. § 5 (p. 101, 36) si mihi unus p. Harl. 2687 : quia mihi unus G2ςλ : cum mihi unus Ld. If the variation has resulted from the misinterpretation of a compendium, it might be allowable to suggest quoniam. Similarly at ii, 1, § 54 p and Harl. 2687 support the vulgate with si in eas. D at first wrote quin ea, and then corrected to si in eas. The cod. Ld. has quam, and Harl. 4105 .