Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:48:03.785Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hidden Quantities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

E. A. Sonnenschein
E. A. Sonnenschein
Affiliation:
30, Calthorpe Road, Edgbaston
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Contributions
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , May 1912 , pp. 78 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1912

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 78 note 1 The perfect participle ēsus or ēssus (from ĕdtos) stands on a different footing; see Niedermann's Outlines of Latin Phonetics, translated by Strong and Stewart, § 83 (p. 82) and § 26.

page 79 note 1 The e is also treated as short in the most recent Latin dictionaries published in Germany (Stowasser and Heinichen, referred to below); as to the quantity of esca they disagree.

page 79 note 2 Thus we should pronounce either totiens, vicensimus, or totiēs, vicēsimus, not totiēns, vicēknsimus. [But what of Greek κ⋯νσωρ etc. ?—ED. C. R]

page 79 note 3 The great Thesaurus is not available except for A—D (up to the word Designo).

page 80 note 1 Prof. Postgate (New Latin Primer) marks iūssi, iūssum, but in sanxi, sanctum agrees with Stowasser. In the following forms he disagrees with all the above authorities: the Present mītto and the Perfect and Supine of cēdo (cēssi, cēssum). The Thesaurus, too, has cessi, cessum (ĕ).