No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
page 150 note 2 Cp. 137 πληγ⋯ ∆ιόs, 455 f. εἰ δ⋯ τιs θε***ν βλ⋯πτoι, φύγoι τἄν χὠ κακ⋯s τ⋯ν κρε⋯σσoνα.
page 150 note 3 See Publications of the University of Cincinnati, Some Grammatical Myths.
page 151 note 1 Cp. Ф 83 μ⋯λλω πoν ⋯π⋯χθεσθαι ∆ι⋯ παΥρᾧ, Υ 451 ᾧ μ⋯λλειs εὖχεσθαι, Ω 46 μ⋯λλει μ⋯ν πoύ τιs κα⋯ Ф***λτερoν ἄλλoν ⋯λ⋯σσαι.
page 152 note 1 Sophocles 0. T. 839 ἄν ⋯κπεФενγo⋯ην.
page 152 note 2 It is worthy of note that Plato, when he has occasion to employ the same verb in the same mood and tense, makes use of the periphrastic form ἄν ⋯μπεπτωκὼs ε⋯η (Rep. 569c). Cp. Pseudo-Demosthenes 59. 11 περιπεπτωκὼs ἦν.
page 152 note 3 Mekler (Teubner) reads the indicative, Jebb the subjunctive.
page 153 note 1 Dionysius of Halicarnassus, in his treatise De Compositione Verborum, speaks of the arch-offender against style, Hegesias, as being afflicted with θεoβλ⋯βεια ηα⋯ διαФθoρ⋯ Фρεν***ν ὢστε εἰδότα τoὺs κρε⋯ττovs ἔπειτα τoὺs χε⋯ρoναs, (‘so infatuated and fatally misguided that he chose the worse although he knew the better’).