No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
page 159 note 2 This word is convenient, but of course inaccurate.
page 159 note 3 Most, if not all, of my ‘tracings’ have been done at least twice, in many cases at an interval of years.
page 160 note 1 See his Bacchylides, passim.
page 160 note 2 E.g. Sappho und Simonides, p. 49.
page 160 note 3 E.g. 1231.
page 160 note 4 It is possible, I think, that Hibeh Papyrus 17 might be more easily read in a photograph taken with a ‘panchromatic’ plate.
page 160 note 5 Cf. ProfessorHousman, , Proc. Class. Assoc., 1921, p. 77Google Scholar: ‘There is one foolish sort of conjecture…. The practice is, if you have persuaded yourself that a text is corrupt, to alter a letter or two and see what happens.’
page 160 note 6 ναβαισατρεῦ.
page 160 note 7 Alexis, 2. 385K; his own suggestion accounts for three words out of two and a half lines at the cost of an unlikely elision.
page 160 note 8 Schol. on the Triballian episode Ar. Av. 1629.
page 161 note 1 Some of Hoffman's conclusions have been proved wrong by later discoveries, but as a collection of the evidence available in 1893 his book has never been superseded.
page 161 note 2 Note that Johannes Grammaticus' 
ends with the words 
.
page 161 note 3 Such as occur in the same MSS.
page 161 note 4 Though this is hardly necessary in view of Thessalian and Homeric parallels; cf. ἐσκέραμεν, Alc. 156. 1, which escaped Mr. Lobel.
page 161 note 5 The list, one of the results of six weeks' study of the Bacchylides Papyri, is before me as I write—e.g. [σέυον]το, 3. 5 (so also Süss in Teubner text) should certainly be [ἵεν]το.
A more detailed reply will be printed in the Proc. Camb. Philol. Soc.