Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:17:12.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Note on the Rhesus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

S. H. Steadman
Affiliation:
Bristol.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1945

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 6 note 1 Il. x. 334 f.

page 6 note 2 Ibid. 465–8.

page 6 note 3 Ibid. 526–9.

page 6 note 4 Ibid. 570 f.

page 6 note 1 I assume what seems the most probable view: that the Rhesus was rightly attributed by the didascaliae and is a work of the playwright's immaturity, perhaps written a few years before the Peliades (455 B.C.).

page 6 note 2 Il. 339–41.

page 6 note 3 Rh. 208–13.

page 6 note 4 592 f.

page 7 note 1 Rh. 139: Ag. 4; Rh. 790 f.: Ag. 1389 f.; possibly Rh. 289: Ag. 562— occurs only three times in Tragedy.

page 7 note 2 29.

page 7 note 3 224.

page 7 note 4 535.

page 7 note 5 543, S62.

page 7 note 1 The phrase suggests that somehow it was more than a dream.

page 7 note 2 Il. viii. 497–541.Google Scholar

page 8 note 1 Rh. 56–66.

page 8 note 2 224–7.

page 8 note 3 Pind. P. i. 39; schol. ad Ar. Eq. 1240; it might naturally occur in a play the hero of which was king of Mysia.

page 8 note 4 Il. iv. 101.

page 8 note 5 For a full discussion of the matter see Jebb on Soph. El. 6 f.

page 8 note 1 Rh. 573.

page 8 note 2 521.

page 8 note 3 573.

page 8 note 4 688.

page 8 note 5 Cf. Little Red Riding-Hood.

page 8 note 6 985–6.