Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-5ws7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-10T04:56:27.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 13 , Issue 5 , June 1899 , pp. 272 - 273
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1899

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The Editor, doubting the validity of this exegesis, kindly points out however that Horace may well have used the same syntax as Propertius, and he quotes Prop. i. 11, 17. But Martial, i. 41, 18, writes non cuicumque datum est habere nasum, i e. satirical wit; is it incredible that nasus might also mean not sense, but nicety of smell?