Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:25:15.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Two Passages in Aristotle's Ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

R. Hackforth
R. Hackforth
Affiliation:
Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , February 1932 , pp. 5 - 9
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1932

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 6 note 1 I accept Bywater's <τν> in io as an improvement, though not really essential. Mr. H. Rackham reminds me that Kh has ὔντων κακων, and that this is no doubt a lipography for ν <τοιν> τν κακν.

page 6 note 2 The two Kai will not be correlative: the first will mean ‘also,’ i.e. οὐ μνον γαθῷ λλ καἰ.

page 7 note 1 It may fairly be called a suggestion, though of course it is made only to be rejected.

page 7 note 2 In view of the fact that ὑγɛια and ἰατρς are Aristotle's stock examples of formal and efficient causes I do not think that the proportion can mean anything less than this.

page 8 note 1 Alternatively we might take νυπρχουσα as agreeing with δον, instead of inserting a second article.

page 8 note 2 Ross has ‘the corresponding permanent state’; Peters ‘the habit or trained faculty’; Welldon ‘a state or quality’; Rackham ‘the fixed disposition.’