Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:26:20.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Persiana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

Niall Rudd
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 282 note 1 Nisbet, R. G. M., Critical Essays on Roman Literature: Satire, ed. Sullivan, J. P. (London, 1963), 43Google Scholar. On this point we are in line with Housman, A. E., C.Q. viii (1913), 13Google Scholar.

page 282 note 2 Cf. Persius 1. 124.

page 282 note 3 Borthwick, E. K. in C.Q. lxi (1967), 45 takes senium in Epist. i. 18. 47 as ‘languor’Google Scholar.

page 283 note 1 Housman, op. cit. (p. 282 n. 1 above), 14.

page 283 note 2 Madvig, Adv. crit. ii. 128.

page 284 note 1 So Conington in his note. His translation, however, says ‘when bursting’, which is close to the interpretation advocated here.

page 285 note 1 Dessen, C. S., Iunctura Callidus Acri (Illinois, 1968), 32Google Scholar.

page 287 note 1 Whatever view one adopts about the voices, it is hard to reconcile stertis adhuc with 7 ff. I assume that there is a slight inconsistency and that Persius overlooked or ignored it.