No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
page 211 note 1 Of the two parallels cited, Herodotus IV. 45 is concerned only with the geographical boundaries of Europe, and Euripides, Androm. 650 (
) is merely a choice of any two distant spots; note, too, ὑπρ, which differentiates this from Isth. II. 42 and recalls rather Isth. VI. 23 (
) and Bacch. VIII. 41(
).
page 212 note 1 Schröder notes that MS. D has ῥῃσεις for ῥσεις: but as B has ῥσεις, and both MSS. have ῥσις seven words later, ῥῄσεις is no foundation on which to build conjectures.
page 212 note 2 Whence κτς came into B is doubtful; it may have been an alteration both in the text and in the scholium for the difficult αὐγς—from which indeed it does not greatly differ palaeo-graphically; or (to reverse a suggestion of Schröder's) it may have crept into the text from a gloss, κτῖνς, on αὐγς.
page 213 note 1 For an interesting parallel to this cf. A. B. Cook,Zeus I., p. 361: a coin of Hadrian, minted at Alexandria, whereon Zeus is portrayed with (amongst other attributes) the rays of Helios and the cornucopiae of the Nile.