Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:51:50.601Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thompson's Meno of Plato - The Meno of Plato. Edited byE. Seymer Thompson. London: Macmillan & Co.

Review products

The Meno of Plato. Edited byE. Seymer Thompson. London: Macmillan & Co.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

John Burnet
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 16 , Issue 6 , July 1902 , pp. 321
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1902

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

321 1 C.R. xvi. p. 98. I hope to return before long to the subject of Vind. F, and I do not at all despair of convincing Mr. Adam that I am right about it. I should, like, however, to point out at once that his interesting criticism of my views in C.R. xvi. p. 215 ignores altogether what is to me the chief part of the argument, namely the frequency in Vind. F of errors which can arise only from the misreading of uncials. Mr. Adam complains that I have not proved Flor. x to be a copy of Vind. F (C.R. xvi. p. 216). I never even attempted to do so in print, though I believe that I could if necessary. I thought that, as I was not immediately concerned with Flor. x, I might assume that Schanz had proved the point (Plato codex, pp. 105, 106). As, however, his affiliation is doubted, I shall do my best to settle the matter at an early date. Flor. x was written in 1420, and we learn from Kollarius' edition of Lambccius, vol. i. pp. 409 sqq. that Vind. F was in the possession of Franciscus Barbaras in that very year. I am not so sure that Ang. v is copied from Flor. x as Schanz seems to be; but I believe that I can prove its descent from Vind. F. I have to thank Mr. Adam for the courteous way in which he has expressed his dissent from my theory.