No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 April 2014
1 Hardly any other text than the Oresteia itself is taken into account: cf. the two-page long ‘Index of Principal Passages’, where over half the listed passages belong to the trilogy.
2 The general index mixes up toponyms, mythological figures, modern scholars and religious concepts in a rather casual way. Furthermore, in the bibliography there are some typographical errors (p. 221 FQONOS D'APESTW and Schadewalt, p. 222 ἂγαλμα), and the paragraph beginning at p. 40 is surprisingly omitted in the contents.