Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:07:15.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diagenetic peculiarities of potential Lower Jurassic reservoir sandstones, Troms 1 area, Off Northern Norway, and their tectonic significance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

P. Riches ,
I. Traub-Sobott ,
W. Zimmerle  and
U. Zinkernagel
P. Riches
Affiliation:
Texaco Ltd, 1 Knightsbridge Green, London SW1X 7QJ, UK
I. Traub-Sobott
Affiliation:
Deutsche Texaco AG, Laboratorium Für Erdölgewinnung, D-3109 Wietze
W. Zimmerle
Affiliation:
Deutsche Texaco AG, Laboratorium Für Erdölgewinnung, D-3109 Wietze
U. Zinkernagel
Affiliation:
Im Pastoratsbusch, D-4630 Bochum 1, FRG
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the Troms 1 area, sediments of Early to Middle Jurassic age, ranging from alluvial plain deposits at the base, passing through coastal plain/tidal flat sediments up into high-energy nearshore shallow-marine sands, mark a transgression. The sandstones, classified as mineralogically and texturally mature quartz-arenites, are potential reservoir rocks in the eastern part of the area. The apparent supermaturity, however, is of secondary origin because unstable detrital components were dissolved during diagenesis. The succession of complex diagenetic processes was: (i) mechanical compaction and simultaneous pressure solution, (ii) partial dissolution with corrosion of detrital quartz and dissolution of unstable fragments, (iii) silica cementation, (iv) calcite cementation, (v) partial carbonate dissolution, (vi) kaolinite/Fe-carbonate cementation in the remaining pore space. Porosity and permeability of the sandstones are controlled by the degree of silicification and by dissolution processes. Two dissolution stages led to partial ‘skeletonization’ of the detrital framework and to elimination of unstable detrital grains. The first stage was a basic process leading to corrosion of detrital quartz and creating transitory secondary porosity; the second stage was acidic leading to the present preserved secondary porosity. Diagenetic dissolution channels formed. The degree of diagenetic alteration was much higher than normally observed in sandstones of such burial depth. Hydrothermal solutions rising from deep-seated faults may have led to this unusual alteration and triggered a rift-related type of complex diagenesis.

Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , October 1986 , pp. 565 - 584
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Kasim, F., Rønnevik, H.C. & Ulleberg, K. (1975) Review of the Jurassic offshore Norway. Pp. 1–11 in : Jurassic Northern North Sea Symposium 1975 (Finstad, K. G. and Selley, R. C., editors). Norwegian Petroleum Society, Stavanger.Google Scholar
Bath, P.G.H., Burgh, J. van der & Ypma, J.G.J. (1983) Enhanced oil recovery in the North Sea. Round Table Discussion 2: Enhanced Recovery of Crude Oil, 11th WorldPetroleum Congress, London 1983, 16pp.Google Scholar
Beach, A. (1979) Pressure solution as a metamorphic process in deformed terrigenous sedimentary rocks. Lithos 12, 51–58.Google Scholar
Bjørlykke, K. (1980) Clastic diagenesis and basin evolution. Revista Instituto de Investigaciones Geológicas, Disputación Provincial Universidad Barcelona 34, 21–44.Google Scholar
Bjørlykke, K., Elverhøi, A. & Malm, A.O. (1979) Diagenesis in Mesozoic sandstones from Spitzbergen and the North Sea—A comparison. Geol. Rundschau 68, 1152–1171.Google Scholar
Blackbourn, G.A. (1984) Diagenetic history and reservoir quality of a Brent Sand sequence. Clay Miner. 19, 377–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanche, J.B. & Whitaker, J.H. McD. (1978) Diagenesis of part of the Brent Sand Formation (Middle Jurassic) of the northern North Sea Basin. J. Geol. Soc. London 135, 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleakley, W.B. (1983) Marathon solves Brae field's problems. Petroleum Engineer International March 15, 13–15.Google Scholar
Brooks, J.R.V. & Chesher, J.A. (1975) Review of the offshore Jurassic of the northern UK North Sea. Pp. 1–24 in: Jurassic Northern North Sea Symposium 1975 (Finstad, K. G. and Selley, R. C., editors). Norwegian Petroleum Society, Stavanger.Google Scholar
Chew, K.J. & Stephenson, H. (1985) Exploration success offshore Norway compared with the remainder of the North Sea and with other countries (Abstact). Habitat of Hydrocarbons, Norwegian Oil & Gas Fields, Stavanger Forum, Stavanger, 1-3 October 1985. Google Scholar
Curtis, C.D. (1983) Geochemistry of porosity enhancement and reduction in clastic sediments. Pp. 113–125 in: Petroleum Geochemistry and Exploration of Europe (Brooks, J., editor). Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Dalland, A. (1981) Mesozoic sedimentary succession at Andøy, Northern Norway, and relation to structural development of the North Atlantic Area..Pp. 563–584 in: Geology of the North Atlantic Borderlands. Canad. Soc. Petroleum Geologists, Memoir 7.Google Scholar
Dapples, E.C. (1967) Diagenesis of sandstones. Pp. 91–125, in: Diagenesis in Sediments (Larsen, G. and Chilingar, G. V., editors) Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Dott, R.H. (1964) Wacke, graywacke and matrix—what approach to immature sandstone classification? J. Sedim. Petrol. 34, 625–632.Google Scholar
Eldholm, O., Sundvor, E., Myhre, A.M. & Faleide, J.I. (1984) Cenozoic evolution of the continental margin off Norway and western Svalbard. Pp. 3–18 in: Petroleum Geology of the North European Margin. Norwegian Petroleum Society.Google Scholar
Faerseth, R.B., Macintyre, R.M. & Naterstad, J. (1976) Mesozoic alkaline dykes in the Sunnhordland region, western Norway; ages, geochemistry and regional significance. Lithos 9, 331–345.Google Scholar
Farmer, R.E. (1965) Genesis of subsurface carbon dioxide. Pp. 378–385 in: Fluids in Subsurface Environments. Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists, Memoir 4.Google Scholar
Fønstelien, S. & Horvei, A. (1979) Thoughts and considerations arising from the study of a “prospective” feature in the Troms 1 area. Proc. Norwegian Sea Symposium, Tromso 1979, 1–10. Norwegian Petroleum Society.Google Scholar
Füchtbauer, H. (1978) Zur Herkunft des Quarzzements. Abschätzung der Quarzauflösung in Silt- und Sandsteinen. Geol. Rundschau 67, 991–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Füchtbauer, H. (1979) Die Sandsteindiagenese im Spiegel der neueren Literatur. Geol. Rundschau 68, 1125–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabrielsen, R.H. (1984) Long-lived fault zones and their influence on the tectonic development of the south-western Barents Sea. J. Geol. Soc. London 141, 651–662.Google Scholar
Hallam, A. (1971) Mesozoic geology and the opening of the North Atlantic. J. Geol. 79, 129–154.Google Scholar
Hallam, A. & Sellwood, B. W. (1975) Middle Mesozoic sedimentation in relation to tectonics in the British area. Pp. 1–32 in: Jurassic Northern North Sea Symposium 1975 (Finstad, K. G. and Selley, R. C., editors). Norwegian Petroleum Society, Stavanger.Google Scholar
Hancock, N.J. & Taylor, A.M. (1978) Clay mineral diagenesis and oil migration in the Middle Jurassic Brent Formation. J. Geol. Soc. London 135, 69–72.Google Scholar
Hanisch, J. (1983) The structural evolution of the NE Atlantic region. Geol. Jb. B52, 3–37.Google Scholar
Haszeldine, R.S., Samson, I.M. & Cornford, C. (1984) Quartz diagenesis and convective fluid movement: Beatrice Oilfield, UK North Sea. Clay Miner. 19, 391–402.Google Scholar
Hoholick, J.D., Metarko, T. & Potter, P.E. (1984) Regional variations of porosity and cement: St. Peter and Mount Simon sandstones, Illinois Basin. Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull. 68, 753–764.Google Scholar
Howitt, F., Aston, E. & Jacque, M. (1975) The occurrence of Jurassic volcanics in the North Sea. Pp. 379–387 in: Petroleum and the Continental Shelf of North-West Europe, vol. 1 Geology (Woodland, A.W., editor). Institute of Petroleum, London.Google Scholar
Johnson, R.J. & Dingwall, R.G. (1981) The Caledonides: their influence on the stratigraphy of the Northwest European continental shelf. Pp. 85–97 in: Petroleum Geology of the Continental Shelf of North-West Europe (Illing, L. V. and Hobson, G. D., editors). Institute of Petroleum, London.Google Scholar
Larese, R.E., Haskell, N.L., Prezbindowski, D.R. & Beju, D. (1984) Porosity development in selected Jurassic sandstones from the Norwegian and North Seas, Norway, an overview. Pp. 81–95 in: Petroleum Geology of the North European Margin. Norwegian Petroleum Society Google Scholar
Lunz, A. (1985) Metasomatische Herkunft der Seltenerdmineralisation und ihre Beziehungen zur Pegmatitbildung und K, Na, Si-Metasomatose (Abstract). 63. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Mineral. Ges. in Aachen, 16-19. Sept. 1985, Fortschr. Miner. 63, Beiheft 1, 138, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Maher, C.E. (1981) The Piper oilfleld. Pp. 358–370 in: Petroleum Geology of the Continental Shelf of North-West Europe. (Illing, L. V. and Hobson, G. D., editors). Institute of Petroleum, London.Google Scholar
Manspeizer, W. (1982) Triassic-Liassic basins and climate of the Atlantic passive margins. Geol. Rundschau 71, 895–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride, E.F. (1985) Diagenetic processes that affect provenance determinations in sandstone. Pp. 95–113, in: Provenance of Arenites (Zuffa, G. G., editor). Reidel, Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster.Google Scholar
Moiola, R.J., Eugene, L., Jones, L. & Shanmugan, G. (1985) Sedimentology and diagenesis of the Brent Group (Middle Jurassic), Statfjord field, Norway—United Kingdom (Abstract). Habitat of Hydrocarbons, Norwegian Oil & Gas Fields, Stavanger Forum, Stavanger, 1-3 October 1985. Google Scholar
Morton, A.C. (1984) Stability of detrital heavy minerals in Tertiary sandstones from the North Sea basin. Clay Miner. 19, 287–308.Google Scholar
Morton, A.C. & Humphreys, B. (1983) The petrology of the Middle Jurassic sandstones from the Murchison Field, North Sea. J. Petroleum Geology 5, 245–260.Google Scholar
Nagtegaal, P.J.C. (1980) Diagenetic models for predicting clastic reservoir quality. Revista Instituto de Investigaciones Geológicas, Disputación Provincial, Universidad Barcelona 34, 5–19.Google Scholar
Olaussen, S., Dalland, A., Gloppen, T.G. & Johannessen, E. (1984) Depositional environment and diagenesis of Jurassic reservoir sandstones in the eastern part of Troms 1 area. Pp. 61–79 in: Petroleum Geology of the North European Margin. Norwegian Petroleum Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Øvrebø, O. & Talleraas, E. (1977) The structural geology of the Troms area (Barents-Sea). Geol. J., 1, 47–54.Google Scholar
Parker, C.A. (1974) Geopressures and secondary porosity in the deep Jurassic of Mississippi. Gulf Coast Assoc. Geol. Socs. Trans. 24, 69–80.Google Scholar
Pitman, W.C. & Talwani, M. (1972) Sea floor spreading in the North Atlantic Ocean. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 83, 619–646.Google Scholar
Randolph, P.L., Soeder, D.J. & Chowdiah, P. (1984) Porosity and permeability of tight sands. Pp. 57–66 in: 1984 SPE/DOE/GRI Symposium on Unconventional Gas Recovery, Pittsburg. Google Scholar
Rønnevlk, H., Eggen, S. & Vollset, J. (1983) Exploration of the Norwegian Shelf. Pp. 71–93 in: Petroleum Geochemistry and Exploration of Europe (Brooks, J., editor). Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Schmidt, V. & McDonald, D.A. (1979) The role of secondary porosity in the course of sandstone diagenesis. Pp. 175–207 in: Aspects of Diagenesis (Scholle, P. A. and Schluger, P. R., editors) SEPM Spec. Publ. 26, Tulsa Okla.Google Scholar
Sellwood, B.W. & Hallam, A. (1974) Bathonian volcanicity and North Sea rifting. Nature 252, 27–28.Google Scholar
Sommer, F. (1978) Diagenesis of Jurassic sandstones in the Viking Graben. J. Geol. Soc. London 135, 63–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talleraas, E. (1979) The Hammerfest Basin—an aulacogen? Norwegian Sea Symposium. Norwegian Petroleum Society, Tromso, 18, 13 pp.Google Scholar
Trurnit, P. (1967) Morphologie und Entstehung von Druck-Lösungserscheinungen während der Diagenese. Inaug. Diss. Naturw.-Mathem. Fakultät, Heidelberg Universität, 2 Bäinde, 234 + 264 pp.Google Scholar
Vielvoye, R. (1985) Discoveries spark industry interest in Norwegian Sea. Oil & Gas J. March 4, 41–46.Google Scholar
Voll, G. (1960) New work on petrofabrics. Liverpool & Manchester Geol. J. 2, 503–567.Google Scholar
Westre, S. (1984) The Askeladden gas find—Troms 1. Pp. 33–39 in: Petroleum Geology of the North European Margin. Norwegian Petroleum Society.Google Scholar
Woodhall, D. & Knox, R.W. O'B. (1979) Mesozoic volcanism in the northern North Sea and adjacent areas. Bull geol. Surv. G.B. 70, 34–56.Google Scholar
Ziegler, P.A. (1982) Triassic rifts and facies patterns in Western and Central Europe. Geol. Rundschau 71, 747–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, W.H., Scott, J. & Doery, R.H.C. (1985) Tectonic habitat of Norway's oil and gas (Abstract). Habitat of Hydrocarbons, Norwegian Oil & Gas Finds, Stavanger Forum, Stavanger, 1-3 October 1985. Google Scholar
Zimmerle, W. & Zinkernagel, U. (1982) Hochdiagenese im Buntsandstein der Bohrung Hardesse T 1, Nordwest-Deutschland (Abstract). Annual Meeting Geol. Vereinigung, Würzburg.Google Scholar
Zinkernagel, U. (1978) Cathodoluminescence of quartz and its application to sandstone petrology. Contr. Sedimentol. 8, 1–69.Google Scholar