Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:00:38.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Argillization of basic hornfelses from the Land's End granite aureole, Cornwall

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

P. A. Floyd
P. A. Floyd*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Keele
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mineralogical and chemical variation in a 24 ft wide argillized zone in basic hornfelses from Gwavas quarry, Cornwall, is described and compared with variation in unaltered wall rock hornfelses.

Hydrothermal minerals developed are well-ordered kaolinite, sericite, chlorite, quartz, and limonite. Biotite has replaced hornblende as the dominant mafic constituent in the argillized zone. With increasing argillization kaolinite progressively replaces plagioclase, biotite, chloritized biotite, quartz, and finally Fe ore. No montmorillonite is present.

From the argillized zone, Si, Na, Ca, Mg, and Fe were extensively leached, although an approximate equivalent of H was added to compensate for the loss. Al and K are relatively constant throughout the zone. F was expelled from the most heavily argillized areas and is now concentrated in the biotite of the zone's margin as a marked ‘fluorine front’.

Two tenuous kaolinite-sericite zones are observed which are thought to be due to local variation in a single hydrothermal pulse with time.

Hydrothermal alteration of the hornfelses was effected in two stages (1) K+ metasomatism (biotitization) and (2) H+ metasomatism (kaolinization and sericitization).

Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , July 1965 , pp. 45 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barringer, A.R. (1953) Bull. Inst. Min. Met. Trans. 63, 26.Google Scholar
Boyle, R.W. (1955) Econ. Geol. 50, 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chayes, F. (1956) Petrographic Modal Analysis—an Elementary Statistical Appraisal. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Exley, C.S. (1959) Q. Jl geol. Soc. Lond. 114, 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floyd, P. (1962) Geology of the Land's End aureole from Tater-du to Newlyn, Cornwall. Ph.D. thesis, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Floyd, P. (1965) Proc. Ussher Soc. 1. (In press).Google Scholar
Halevy, E. (1964) Geochim. cosmochim. Acta 28, 1139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemley, J.J. & Jones|W.R. (1964) Econ. Geol. 59, 538.Google Scholar
Hess, H.H. (1933) Am. J. Sci. 26, 377.Google Scholar
Kerr, P.F., Kulp, J.L., Patterson, C.M. & Wright, R.J. (1950) Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 61, 275.Google Scholar
Peterson, N.P. (1954) Econ. Geol. 49, 462.Google Scholar
Reid, C. & Flett, J.S. (1907) Geology of Land's End. Mem. Geol. Surv. England and Wales.Google Scholar
Riley, J. (1958a) Analytica chim. Acta 19, 413.Google Scholar
Riley, J. (1958b) Analyst, Lond. 83, 42.Google Scholar
Romo, L.A. & Roy, R. (1957) Am. Miner. 42, 165.Google Scholar
Sales, R.H. & Meyer, C. (1948) Amer. Inst. Min. Met. Engineers, Mining Technology T.P. 2400.Google Scholar
Schwartz, G.M. (1955) Econ. Geol. (50th Anniversary Volume), 300.Google Scholar
Schwartz, G.M. (1956) Econ. Geol. 51, 407.Google Scholar
Schwartz, G.M. (1959) Econ. Geol. 54, 161.Google Scholar
Shapiro, L. & Brannock, W. (1962) Bull. U.S. geol. Surv. No. 1144-A, 1.Google Scholar
Stevenson, J.S. (1947) Econ. Geol. 42, 434.Google Scholar
Thomas, B.E. (1949) Econ. Geol. 44, 663.Google Scholar
Tilley, C.E. & Flett, J.S. (1929) Summ. Progr. geol. Surv. G.B. Part II, 24.Google Scholar