Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 July 2018
Spötl et al. (1996) have re-examined studies published by us on clay materials of sandstones in the Paris Basin. They refute the XRD characterization, K-Ar dating and formation temperature of one of the interstratified illite-smectite phases identified and have provided an alternative explanation of the published results. However, the authors ignored some basic data provided in the publications under discussion, and they have not been able to explain readily why some of the data were discarded. Furthermore, part of their disagreement is unsubstantiated. We maintain that, on the basis of coherency and consistency of all the data obtained, as well as on independent published results, the most satisfactory interpretation for the thermal evolution of the Paris Basin is the one that we suggested in our publications.