Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:13:22.546Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Surface properties of bentonite and illite complexes with humus acids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

A. Księżopolska  and
M. Pazur
A. Księżopolska*
Affiliation:
Institute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Doświadczalna 4, 20-290 Lublin 27, Poland
M. Pazur
Affiliation:
Institute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Doświadczalna 4, 20-290 Lublin 27, Poland
*
*E-mail: Alicja.Ksiezopolska@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this study, the reaction between humus acids (humic acid and β-humus fulvic acid fraction) and bentonite and illite was studied at a variety of pH values. The degree of reaction was determined from the specific surface area and molar energy of adsorption. Characteristic parameters of adsorption isotherms for the formation of a mono-layer of the adsorbent, such as the constant C from the BET equation, mono-layer capacity (Nm), and standard error square (R2), were also included in the study. After the addition of humus acids, the specific surface area of illite and bentonite decreased at all pH values, reaching a minimum at pH 4. This indicates different degrees of reaction of humus acids with the clays and, probably, partial hydrophobization of the materials. The degree of reaction of humus acids with the minerals depended on the pH and, for certain combinations, it was highest at pH 4. This value is relatively close to that at which the humus acid fractions in question precipitate from solution.

Keywords

humic acidsβ-humusclay mineralsspecific surface areadegree of reactionhydrophobization
Type
Research Papers
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 149 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akther, A., Hwang, J. & Lee, H. (2008) Sedimentation characteristics of two commercial bentonites in aqueous suspensions. Clay Minerals, 43, 449–457.Google Scholar
Allen, B.L. & Hajek, B.F. (1989) Mineral occurrence in soil environments. Pp. 199–278 in: Minerals in Soil Environments (J.B. Dixon & S.B. Weed, editors), 2nd Edition. SSSA Book Series 1, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.Google Scholar
Bantignies, J.L., Cartier dit Moulin, C. & Dexpert, H. (1997) Wettability contrast in kaolinite and illite clays: characterization by infrared and X-ray adsorption spectroscopies. Clays and Clay Minerals, 45, 184–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkheiser, C.E. (1981) Comparison of water adsorption by monovalent exchange ion forms of soil humic material and synthetic exchanges. Soil Science, 131, 172–177.Google Scholar
Borchardt, G. (1989) Smectites. Pp. 675–728 in: Minerals in Soil Environments (J.B. Dixon & S.B. Weed, editors). 2nd Edition, SSSA Book Series 1. Madison, Wisconsin, USA.Google Scholar
Braunauer, S., Emmet, P.H. & Teller, E. (1938) Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 60, 309–319.Google Scholar
Carter, D.L., Mortland, M.M. & Kemper, K.D. (1986) Specific surface. Pp. 413–423 in: Methods of Soil Analysis (A. Klute, editor) Part 1, 2nd ed. Agronomy Monograph, 9, Madison Wisconsin, USA.Google Scholar
Chiu, C.T., Lee, J.F. & Boyd, S.A. (1990) The surface area of soil organic matter, Environmental Science & Technology. 24, 1164–1166.Google Scholar
Christidis, G.E. (2009) Do bentonites have contradictory characteriristics? An attempt to answer unanswered questions. Clay Minerals, 43, 515–529.Google Scholar
Churchman, G.J. & Burke, C.M. (1991) Properties of subsoils in relation to various measures of surface area and water content. European Journal of Soil Science, 42, 463–478.Google Scholar
Cordorio, N., Silva, J., Gomes, C. & Rocha, F. (2010) Bentonite from Porto Santo Island, Maderia archipelago: surface properties studied by inverse gas chromatography. Clay Minerals, 44, 77–86.Google Scholar
Faghihian, H. & Nejati-Yazdinejad, M. (2009) Equilibrium study of adsorption of L-cysteine by natural bentonite. Clay Minerals, 44, 125–133.Google Scholar
Fanning, D.S., Keramidas, V.Z. & El-Desosky, M.A. (1989) Micas. Pp. 527–634 in: Minerals in Soil Environments (J.B. Dixon and S.B. Weed, editors) 2nd Edition SSSA Book Series 1. Madison, Wisconsin, USA.Google Scholar
Flis-Bujak, M., Księżopoolska, A., Stawiński, J. & Dąbek- Szreniawska, M. (1997) Microstructure of humic acid and b-humic acids from water and N2 adsorption. Pp. 121–126 in: The Role of Humic Substances in Ecosystems and in Environmental Protection (J. Drozd, S. Gonet & N. Senesi, editors), IHSS, Wrocław, Poland.Google Scholar
Greenland, D.J. (1971) Interactions between humic and fulvic acids and clays. Soil Science, 111, 34–41.Google Scholar
Hajnos, M. (1999) Surface energy and its components as parameters determining wettability and aggregation state of selected clay minerals and soils. Acta Agrophysica, 17, 1–116.Google Scholar
Jouany, C. (1991) Surface free energy components of clay-synthetic humic acid complexes from contact angle measurements, Clays and Clay Minerals, 39, 43–49.Google Scholar
Jouany, C. & Chassin, P. (1987) Determination of the surface energy of clay-organic complexes by contact angle measurements. Colloids and Surfaces, 27, 289–303.Google Scholar
Józefaciuk, G. (1998) Changes of surface properties of soils and clay minerals in acidification and alkalization processes. Acta Agrophysica, Monograph, 15, 115 pp.Google Scholar
Khojastehnazhand, M., Tabatabaeefar, A. & Omid, M. (2009) Determination of orange volume and surface area using image technique. International Agrophysics, 23, 237–242.Google Scholar
Kononowa, M.M. (1968) Organic Matter in the Soils; its Structure, Properties, and Methods of Study. PWRL, Warsaw, Poland.Google Scholar
Księżopolska, A. (1996) The Role of Humic Acid Fractions in the Formation Surface Phenomena of Soil Material, Ph.D. thesis, Institute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences in Lublin, Poland, pp. 93 (in Polish).Google Scholar
Księżopolska, A. (2001) Assessment of the conditions for the formation of organic-mineral complexes in soils on the basis of surface properties. International Agrophysics, 15, 165–172.Google Scholar
Lackovic, K., Brunce, B., Johnson, B., Michael, J., Angove, T. & Wells, J.D. (2003) Modeling the adsorption of citric acid onto Muloorina illite and related clay minerals, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 267, 49–59.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, R.C. & Richtie, P.F.S. (1972) Proceedings 3rd ICTA , Davos. Basel-Stuttgart. Mortland M.M. (1970) Clay-organic complexes and interactions. Advances in Agronomy, 22, 75–117.Google Scholar
Ościk, J. (1982) Adsorption. PWS, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
Polish Standard PN-Z-19010-1, (1997) Soil Quality, Determination of the Specific Surface Area of Soils by Water Sorption (BET). Warsaw, Poland (in Polish).Google Scholar
Ruch, R.J. & Shen, M.S. (1971) The wetting of films of organo-bentonite complexes, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 37, 819–823.Google Scholar
Sampaio, E.P. & Sampaio, J.M. (2010) Advances in morphometry of soil macroporosity through simple techniques of mathematics. International Agrophysics, 24, 303–311.Google Scholar
Schnitzer, M. & Schluppli, P. (1989) The extraction of organic matter from selected soils and particle size fractions with 0.5 M NaOH and 0.1 M Na4P2O7 solutions. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 69, 1418–1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokołowska, Z., Hajnos, M. & Dąbek-Szreniawska, M. (1999) Relation between adsorption of water vapour, specific surface area and soil cultivation. Polish Journal of Soil Science, 32/2, 3–11.Google Scholar
Somelar, P., Kirsimae, K. & Środoń, J. (2009) Mixed layer illite-smectite in the Kinnekulle K-bentonite, northern Baltic Basin, Clay Minerals, 44, 455–468.Google Scholar
Środoń, J. (2010) Quantification of illite and smectite and their layer charges in sandstones and shales from shallow burial depth. Clay Minerals, 44, 421–434.Google Scholar
Stawiń ski, J. (1977) Interrelationships between the specific surface area and some physico-chemical properties of soils. Zeszyty Problemowe Postępów Nauk Rolniczych, 197, 229–240.Google Scholar
Stawiński, J., Wierzchoś, J. & Garcia-Gonzalez, M.T. (1990) Influence of calcium and sodium concentration on the microstructure of bentonite and kaolin. Clays and Clay Minerals, 38, 617–622.Google Scholar
Stawiński, J., Gliński, J., Ostrowski, J., Stępniewska, Z., Sokołowska, Z., Bowanko, G., Jó zefaciuk, G., Księżopolska, A. & Matyka-Sarzyńska, D. (2000) Spatial characterization of specific surface area of arable soils in Poland, Acta Agrophysica, 33, pp. 43.Google Scholar
Stevenson, F.J. (1994) Humus Chemistry: Genesis, Composition, Reactions. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Theng, B.G.K. (1974) The Chemistry of Clay-Organic Reactions. John Wiley Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Tombacz, E., Szekeres, M., Barangi, L. & Micheli, E. (1998) Surface modification of clay minerals by organic polyions, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 141, 379–384.Google Scholar
Varadachari, Ch., Mondal, A.H., Dulalc, N. & Ghosh, K. (1994) Clay-humus complexation: effect of pH and the nature of bonding. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 26, 1145–1149.Google Scholar