Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:48:20.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Time evolution of MX-80 bentonite geochemistry under thermo-hydraulic gradients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

R. Gómez-Espina  and
M.V. Villar
R. Gómez-Espina
Affiliation:
Universidad Andres Bello, Carretera Concepción-Talcahuano, 7100 Concepción, Chile
M.V. Villar*
Affiliation:
CIEMAT, Avd. Complutense 40, 28040 Madrid, Spain
*
*E-mail: mv.villar@ciemat.es
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Two 20-cm long columns of MX-80 bentonite compacted at a nominal dry density of 1.7 g/cm3 with a water content of 17% were tested in thermo-hydraulic (TH) cells with the aim of simulating the conditions of a sealing material in a nuclear waste repository. On top of the columns a hydration surface simulated the host rock supplying groundwater and at the bottom a heater simulated the waste canister. The tests comprised two phases: a heating phase and a ‘heating + hydration’ phase. The temperatures at the ends of the columns were set during the last phase to 30°C at the top and 140°C at the bottom, respectively. The thermo-hydraulic treatment resulted in major changes along the bentonite columns. These changes led to significant gradients along the column with respect to the physical state (water content, dry density) and geochemistry of the bentonite. Smectite dissolution processes occurred. As a result, colloids were probably produced, particularly in the more hydrated areas. In the warmest part of the columns precipitation of carbonates took place, caused by their solubility decrease with temperature and the evaporation. The increase in water content reduced the ionic strength of the pore water in the more hydrated areas where species such as gypsum were dissolved. The solubilized ions were transported towards the bottom of the columns; Na+, Ca+, Mg2+ and SO42− moved at a similar rate and K+ and Cl− moved farther. These solubilized ions precipitated in the form of salts farther away along the columns as the test was longer. The TH treatment implied the loss of exchangeable positions in the smectite, particularly towards the heater. The cation exchange complex was also modified.

Keywords

bentoniteengineered barriersnuclear wastepore waterthermo-hydraulic treatment
Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , May 2016 , pp. 145 - 160
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2016 This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2016

References

Åkesson, M. (2012) Temperature Buffer Test. Final report. SKB Technical Report TR-12-04. Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB, Stockholm, 50 pp.Google Scholar
Åkesson, M., Olsson, S., Dueck, A., Nilsson, U., Karnland, O., Kiviranta, L., Kumpulainen, S. & Lindén, J. (2012) Temperature Buffer Test. Hydro-mechanical and chemical/mineralogical characterizations. SKB P-12-06, Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB, Stockholm, 89 pp.Google Scholar
Appelo, C.A.J. (2015) Principles, caveats and improve-ments in databases for calculating hydrogeochemical reactions in saline waters from 0 to 200°C and 1 to 1000 atm. Applied Geochemistry, 55, 62–71.10.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.11.007Google Scholar
Dohrmann, R. & Kaufhold, S. (2014) Cation exchange and mineral reactions observed in MX 80 buffer samples of the Prototype repository in situ experiment in Äspö, Sweden. Clays and Clay Minerals, 62, 357–373.10.1346/CCMN.2014.0620501Google Scholar
Dueck, A., Johannesson, L.E., Kristensson, O., Olsson, S., Sjöland, A. (2011) Hydro-mechanical and chemical-mineralogical analyses of the bentonite buffer from a full-scale field experiment simulating a high-level waste repository. Clays and Clay Minerals, 59, 595–607.10.1346/CCMN.2011.0590605Google Scholar
Fernández, A.M. & Villar, M.V. (2010) Geochemical behaviour of a bentonite barrier in the laboratory after up to 8 years of heating and hydration. Applied Geochemistry, 25, 809–824.10.1016/j.apgeochem.2010.03.001Google Scholar
Gómez-Espina, R. & Villar, M.V. (2010a) Geochemical and mineralogical changes in compacted MX-80 bentonite submitted to heat and water gradients. Informes Técnicos CIEMAT 1199. Madrid, 33 pp.Google Scholar
Gómez-Espina, R. & Villar, M.V. (2010b) Geochemical and mineralogical changes in compacted MX-80 bentonite submitted to heat and water gradients. Applied Clay Science, 47, 400–408.10.1016/j.clay.2009.12.004Google Scholar
Gómez-Espina, R. & Villar, M.V. (2013) Modificaciones en la bentonita MX-80 compactada sometida a trata-miento termo-hidráulico. Informe Técnico CIEMAT 1290, Madrid, 85 pp.Google Scholar
Gómez-Espina, R. & Villar, M.V. (2015) Effects of heat and humidity gradients on MX-80 bentonite geochemistry and mineralogy. Applied Clay Science, 109-110, 39-8.10.1016/j.clay.2015.03.012Google Scholar
Grim, R.E. & Kulbicki, E. (1961) Montmorillonite: High temperature reactions and classification. American Mineralogist, 46, 1329–1369.Google Scholar
Karnland, O. & Birgesson, M. (2006) Montmorillonite stability - with special respect to KBS-3 conditions. SKB Technical Report TR-06-11. Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB, Stockholm, 39 pp.Google Scholar
Karnland, O., Olsson, S., Dueck, A., Birgesson, M., Nilsson, U., Hernan-Hakansson, T., Pedersen, K., Nilsson, S., Eriksen, T.E. & Rosborg, B. (2009) Long term test of buffer material at the Äspö HRL, LOT Project. Final report on the A2 test parcel. SKB Technical Report TR-09-29. Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB, Stockholm, 296 pp.Google Scholar
Karnland, O., Olsson, S., Sandén, T., Faith, V., Jansson, M., Eriksen, T.E., Svärdström, K., Rosborg, B. & Muurinen, A. (2011) Long term test of buffer material at the Äspö HRL, LOT Project. Final report on the A0 test parcel. SKB Technical Report TR-09-31. Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB, Stockholm, 123 pp.Google Scholar
Meier, L.P. & Kahr, G. (1999) Determination of the exchange capacity (CEC) of clay minerals using the complexes of copper(II) ion with triethylenetetramine and tetraethylenepentamine. Clays and Clay Minerals, 47, 386–388.10.1346/CCMN.1999.0470315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D.M. & Reynolds, R.C. (1997) X-ray Diffraction and the Identification and Analysis of Clay Minerals, 2nd edition. Oxford University Press, New York, 332 pp.Google Scholar
Olsson, S. & Karnland, O. (2011) Mineralogical and chemical characteristics of the bentonite in the A2 test parcel of the LOT field experiments at Äspö HRL, Sweden. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 36, 1545–1553.10.1016/j.pce.2011.10.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsson, S., Jensen, V., Johannesson, L.E., Hanse, E., Karnland, O., Kumpulainen, S., Kiviranta, L., Svensson, D., Hansen, S. & Lindén, J. (2013) Prototype Repository. Hydro- mechanical, chemical and mineralogical characterization of the buffer and tunnel backfill material from the outer section of the Prototype Repository. SKB Technical Report TR-13-21. Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB, Stockholm, 168 pp.Google Scholar
Parkhurst, D.L. & Appelo, C.A.J. (1999) Users guide to PHREEQC (Version 2) - a computer program for speciation, batch reactions, one dimensional transport and inverse geochemical calculations. Water Resources Investigations Report 99-4259, US Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Reynolds, R.C. (1980) Interstratified clay minerals. Pp. 249–303 in: Crystal Structures of Clay Minerals and Their X-ray Identification (G.W. Brindley and G. Brown, editors). Monograph 5, Mineralogical Society, London.Google Scholar
Salas, J., Sena, C. & Arcos, D. (2014) Hydrogeochemical evolution of the bentonite buffer in a KBS-3 repository for radioactive waste. Reactive transport modeling of the LOT A2 experiment. Applied Clay Science, 101, 521–532.10.1016/j.clay.2014.09.016Google Scholar
Sandén, T., Goudarzi, R., de Combarieu, M., Åkesson, M. & Hökmark, H. (2007) Temperature buffer test — design, instrumentation and measurements. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 32, 77–92.10.1016/j.pce.2006.04.025Google Scholar
Villar, M.V., Sánchez, M. & Gens, A. (2008) Behaviour of a bentonite barrier in the laboratory: Experimental results up to 8 years and numerical simulation. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 33, S476–S485.Google Scholar
Villar, M.V., Gómez-Espina, R., Gutiérrez-Nebot, L., Campos, R. & Barrios, I. (2012) Physical changes in MX-80 bentonite saturated under thermal gradient. ANDRA 5th International Meeting Clays in Natural and Engineered Barriers for Radioactive Waste Confinement, Montpellier, October 2012. Abstracts, pp 312-313, AP/PTO/10.Google Scholar
Wersin, P., Johnson, L.H. & McKinley, I.G. (2007) Performance of the bentonite barrier at temperatures beyond 100°C: A critical review. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 32, 780–788.10.1016/j.pce.2006.02.051Google Scholar