Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:04:15.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tritium accumulation in structures of clay minerals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

E. A. Kalinichenko ,
R. A. Pushkarova ,
P. Fenoll Hach-Alí  and
A. López-Galindo
E. A. Kalinichenko
Affiliation:
Institute of Geochemistry, Mineralogy and Ore Formation, Palladin Av. 34, 03680 Kiev, Ukraine
R. A. Pushkarova
Affiliation:
State Scientific Centre of Environmental Radiogeochemistry, Palladin Av. 34a, 03680 Kiev, Ukraine
P. Fenoll Hach-Alí*
Affiliation:
Instituto Andaluz de Ciencias de la Tierra. CSIC – Universidad de Granada, Avda. Fuentenueva, s/n, 18002 Granada, Spain
A. López-Galindo
Affiliation:
Instituto Andaluz de Ciencias de la Tierra. CSIC – Universidad de Granada, Avda. Fuentenueva, s/n, 18002 Granada, Spain
*
*E-mail: pfenoll@goliat.ugr.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Tritium accumulation in clay minerals (kaolinite, montmorillonite, palygorskite) was studied experimentally over a one year contact with tritiated water (initial activity 1.676x109 Bq/m3) under room conditions, and was compared to theoretical calculations. The amounts of tritium ions in bound water and structural hydroxyls were measured by the activity of water fractions released at characteristic temperatures determined on the basis of the mineral DTA patterns. Experiments showed that after a 400 day contact with tritiated water, tritium exchange rates (θ) were highest in palygorskite (θa = 0.42 in bound water and θs = 0.51 in the structure) compared to montmorillonite (θa = 0.15 and θs = 0.11, respectively) and kaolinite (θa = 0.34 and θs = 0.02, respectively). This could be due to different tritium concentrations in the solution near the bound-water layers, and also to certain features of the mineral structures, most of the kaolinite structural hydroxyls not interacting directly with bound HTO molecules.

Tritium accumulation in these minerals, under room conditions, can be described by a relatively simple two-stage isotope exchange model in which tritium ions first migrate from the solution to the bound layers and then substitute the protons of the structural hydroxyls. Rate constants for both stages of this isotope exchange were calculated on the basis of the experimental data.

Keywords

tritium accumulationclay mineralshydrogen isotope exchange kinetics and mechanisms
Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , September 2002 , pp. 497 - 508
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bradley, W.F. (1940) The structural scheme of attapulgite. American Mineralogist, 25, 405–410.Google Scholar
Choi, J.W., Park, H.S. & Oscarson, D.W. (1996) Effect of exchangeable cation on radionuclide diffusion in compacted bentonite. Journal of the Korean Nuclear Society, 28, 274–279.Google Scholar
Christ, C.L., Hathaway, J.C., Hostetler, P.B. & Shepard, A.O. (1969) Palygorskite: New X-ray data. American Mineralogist, 54, 198–205.Google Scholar
Chukgrov, F.V. (1992) Minerals. Vol. IV, 2, Nauka, Moscow, 1058 pp.Google Scholar
Cigna, A.A. (1993) Problems of tritium in the environment. Energia Nucleare, 2, 5–15.Google Scholar
Collins, R.E. (1961) Flow of Liquids through Porous Materials. Reinhold Publishing Corporation, New York, 350 pp.Google Scholar
Cook, P.G., Solomon, D.K., Sanford, W.E., Busenberg, E., Plummer, L.N. & Poreda, R.J. (1996) Inferring shallow groundwater flow in saprolite and fractured rock using environmental tracers. Water Resources Research, 32, 1501–1509.Google Scholar
De Regge, P. (1995) Investigation on the determination of disposal critical nuclides in waste from PWR power plants. NIRAS/ONDRAF contract CCHO-90/ 123, progress report, January–June 1995, R-3091.Google Scholar
Egerev, V.K. (1970) Diffusion Kinetics in Static Mediums. Nauka, Moscow, 228 pp.Google Scholar
Frank-Kamenetsky, D.A. (1967) Diffusion and Heat Transfer in Chemical Kinetics. Nauka, Moscow, 490 pp.Google Scholar
Frost, R.L. (1998) Hydroxyl deformation in kaolin. Clays and Clay Minerals, 46, 280–289.Google Scholar
Goldansky, V.I., Trakhtenberg, L.I. & Flerov, V.N. (1989) Tunneling Phenomena in Chemical Physics. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York, 328 p.Google Scholar
Hammes-Schiffer, S. (1998) Mixed quantum/classical dynamics of single proton, multiple proton, and proton-coupled electron transfer reactions in the condensed phase. Pp. 73–119 in: Advances in Classical Trajectory Methods (Hase, W.L., editor). Vol. 3, JAI Press Inc., Greenwich, London.Google Scholar
Jia, G. (1996) Loose water tritium distribution in soil around China Institute of Atomic Energy (CIAE) and its impact on the environment. Journal of Radioan alytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 1, 193–204.Google Scholar
Kalinichenko, E.A., Litovchenko, A.S. & Dekhtyaruk, N.T. (1995) Form of proton potential energy curve in muscovite. Dop. NANU (The Ukraine Science Academy Reports) N5, pp. 56–59.Google Scholar
Lensky, L.A. (1981) Tritium in systems containing water. Energoizdat, Moscow, 77 pp.Google Scholar
Maiti, G.C. & Freund, F. (1981) Dehydration-related proton conductivity in kaolinite. Clays and Clay Minerals, 16, 395–413.Google Scholar
Murphy, C.E. (1991) The transport, dispersion and cycling of tritium in the environment. Report WSRC-RP-90-462; Order No DE91002547, 70 pp.Google Scholar
Pitteloud, C., Powell, D.H., Soper, A.K. & Benmore, C.J. (2000) The structur e of interlayer water in Wyoming-montmorillonite studied by neutron diffraction with isotopic substitution. Physica B, 276–278, 236–237.Google Scholar
Prost, R. (1975) Interaction between bound water molecules and the lattice of clay minerals: hydration mechanism of smectites . Proceedin gs of the International Clay Conference, Mexico,351–359.Google Scholar
Pushkarova, R.A. (1998) Tritium in structure of clay minerals of loess-like rock. Mineralogicheskiy zhurnal, 3, 67–69.Google Scholar
Savin, S.M. & Epstein, S. (1970) The oxygen and hydrogen isotope geochemistry of clay minerals. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 34, 25–42.Google Scholar
Shan, R., De Vita, A., Heine, V. & Payne, M.C. (1996) Mechanism of tritium diffusion in lithium oxide. Physical Review B: Condens ed Matter, 53, 8257–8261.Google Scholar
Sharafutdinov, R.B., Stroganov, A.A. & Levin, A.G. (1999) Geo1ogical-geochemistry aspects of radioactive waste isolation. Russian Institute of Science and Technology Information (VIN1TI), 5, 2–90.Google Scholar
Smirnov, K.S. & Bougeard, D. (1999) A molecular dynamics study of structure and short-time dynamics of water in kaolinite. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 103, N25, 5266–5273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sposito, G., Park, S.H. & Sutton, R. (1999) Monte Carlo simulation of the total radial distribution function for interlayer water in sodium and potassium montmorillonites. Clays and Clay Minerals, 47, 192–200.Google Scholar
Tarasevich, Yu.I. (1988) Structure and Surface Chemistry of Layer Silicates. Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 248 pp.Google Scholar
Tarasevich, Yu.I & Ovcharenko, F.D. (1975) Adsorption on Clay Minerals. Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 352 pp.Google Scholar
Thibault, D.H., Sheppard, M.I. & Smith, P.A. (1990) A Critical Compilation and Review of Default Soil Solid/Liquid Partition Coefficients, Kd, for Use in Environmental Assessments. AECL-10125, Whiteshe ll Nuclear Research Establ ishment, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Pinawa, Canada.Google Scholar
Volckaert, G., Bernier, F. & Alonso, E. (1995) Model Development and Validation of the Thermal- Hydraulic-Mechanical and Geochemical Behaviour of the Clay Barrier. EC contracts FI2W-CT91-0102 and FI2W-CT90-0033, final report, 2 volumes, R- 3084.Google Scholar
Zakn, D. & Brickmann, J. (1999) Quantum-classical simulation of proton migration in water. Israel Journal of Chemistry, 39, N 3-4, 463–482.Google Scholar