Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:15:37.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Integrated Experimental System for Solid-Gas-Liquid Environmental Cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Stephen Guggenheim  and
A. F. Koster van Groos
Stephen Guggenheim*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 845 W. Taylor St., Chicago, Illinois, USA
A. F. Koster van Groos
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 845 W. Taylor St., Chicago, Illinois, USA
*
*E-mail address of corresponding author: xtal@uic.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The geochemistry of minerals in intermediate to deep sedimentary rocks (2–10 km depth) is not known sufficiently well to predict accurately the effect of human activities, such as carbon dioxide sequestration or fracking. To carry out real-time experiments, a high-pressure environmental chamber (HPEC) was constructed for in situ X-ray diffraction (XRD) studies to 1000 bars and to 200°C. In the HPEC, a liquid, e.g. a brine, plus sample in suspension, is pressurized by gas, e.g. CH4 or CO2, or liquid, e.g. supercritical CO2. The unique aspect of this chamber is that the sample + liquid (~2 mL) form a dynamic system, and particles can move freely in the liquid while being illuminated by the X-ray beam. Several HPECs were constructed of Ti alloy, stainless steel, or carbon-fiber polyether ketone to be resistant to corrosion under basic or acidic conditions. These HPECs are compatible with standard transmission-mode diffractometers with sealed-tube X-ray sources (Mo radiation is being used at the University of Illinois at Chicago — UIC) or with brilliant X-ray sources. In addition, to allow long-duration studies or, for example, to study the effect of micro-organisms on these mineral reactions, a large-bore (~25 mL) reaction vessel system was devised that could be examined regularly at appropriate P/T conditions or off-line. Calibration of the HPEC and XRD pattern processing is discussed and illustrated. The potential significance of these devices goes beyond understanding the deep sedimentary environment, because materials and reactions can be studied while using nearly any liquid as an immersion agent. As an example, experimental results are given for the d001 values of montmorillonite clay vs. temperatures to 150°C at P(CO2) = 500 bars in a NaCl-rich brine.

Keywords

Experimental Clay StudiesReaction VesselsXRD
Type
Article
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals , Volume 62 , Issue 6 , December 2014 , pp. 470 - 476
Copyright
Copyright © Clay Minerals Society 2014

References

Bassett, W.A. and Takahashi, T., 1965 Silver iodide polymorphs American Mineralogist 50 1576–1594.Google Scholar
Bruker-AXS (2003) General Area Detector Diffraction System, GADDS, v. 4.1.14.Google Scholar
Giesting, P. Guggenheim, S. Koster van Groos, A.F. and Busch, A., 2012 Interaction of carbon dioxide with Naexchanged montmorillonite at pressures to 640 bars: Implications for CO2 sequestration International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 8 73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giesting, P. Guggenheim, S. Koster van Groos, A.F. and Busch, A., 2012 X-ray diffraction study of K- and Caexchanged montmorillonites in CO2 atmospheres Environmental Science & Technology 46 5623–5630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guggenheim, S., 2004 Simulations of Debye-Scherrer and Gandolfi powder patterns using the Bruker SMART/APEX three-circle diffractometer system Chicago, Il. American Crystallographic Association Annual Meeting.Google Scholar
Guggenheim, S., 2005 Simulations of Debye-Scherrer and Gandolfi patterns using a Bruker SMART/APEX diffractometer system Bruker-AXS Application Notes Series 373 1–8.Google Scholar
Guggenheim, S. and Koster, v G AF, 2003 A new gas hydrate phase: Synthesis and stability of clay-methane hydrate intercalate Geology 31 653–656.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazen, R.M. and Finger, L.W., 1982 Comparative Crystal Chemistry New York John-Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Koster van Groos, A.F. and Guggenheim, S., 2009 The stability of methane hydrate intercalates of montmorillonite and nontronite: Implications for carbon storage in oceanfloor environments American Mineralogist 94 372–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koster van Groos, A.F. Guggenheim, S. and Cornell, C., 2002 Elevated-pressure, low-temperature environmental chamber for powder X-ray diffractometers Reviews of Scientific Instruments 74 273–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauron, P.h. Bielmann, M. Remhof, A. and Züttel, A., 2011 High-pressure and high-temperature x-ray diffraction cell for combined pressure, composition, and temperature measurements of hydrides Review of Scientific Instruments 82 065108-1–065108-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toulemonde, P. Goujon, C. Laversenne, L. Bordet, P. Bruyère, R. Legendre, M. Leynaud, O. Prat, A. and Mezouar, M., 2014 High pressure and high temperature in situ X-ray diffraction studies in the Paris-Edinburgh cell using a laboratory X-ray source High Pressure Research 34 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Valkenburg, A., Giardini, A.A. and Lloyd, E.C., 1962 High-pressure microscopy High-Pressure Measurement D.C. Butterworth, Washington 87–94.Google Scholar