Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-30T21:46:05.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterization of the Second Parcel of the Alternative Buffer Material (ABM) Experiment — I Mineralogical Reactions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

S. Kaufhold ,
R. Dohrmann ,
N. Götze  and
D. Svensson
S. Kaufhold*
Affiliation:
BGR, Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe, Stilleweg 2, D-30655, Hannover, Germany
R. Dohrmann
Affiliation:
BGR, Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe, Stilleweg 2, D-30655, Hannover, Germany LBEG, Landesamt für Bergbau, Energie und Geologie, Stilleweg 2, D-30655, Hannover, Germany
N. Götze
Affiliation:
LBEG, Landesamt für Bergbau, Energie und Geologie, Stilleweg 2, D-30655, Hannover, Germany
D. Svensson
Affiliation:
Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co (SKB), P1 300 SE-57295, Figeholm, Sweden
*
*E-mail address of corresponding author: s.kaufhold@bgr.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The performance of bentonite barriers for high level radioactive waste (HLRW) disposal is currently being tested in various real-and up-scale disposal tests. One of the disposal tests, the ABM test (ABM = alternative buffer material), was conducted by SKB (Svensk Kärnbränslehantering) as a mediumscale experiment at the Äspö hard rock laboratory in Sweden. The present study deals with the second parcel (ABM-II), which was retrieved after 6.5 years with 2.5 years of water saturation and 3–4 years of heating up to 141°C. Nine different bentonites and two marine clays were tested to investigate the performance. The aim of the study was to provide a detailed characterization of the mineralogical and chemical changes that took place in ABM-II, compare the findings with ABM-I (the first of the six test parcels), and try to draw some general conclusions concerning the use of bentonites in such geotechnical barriers. The ABM-II test parcel revealed a set of reactions that a HLRW bentonite might undergo. The most prominent reaction was the rather complete exchange of cations, which was discussed in a second part to this publication (II — cation exchange; Dohrmann and Kaufhold, 2017). The corrosion of the Fe in metal canisters was observed, but no discrete corrosion product was identified. At the interface of bentonite and the metal canister, the formation of smectite-type trioctahedral clay minerals was observed. In contrast to the ABM-I test, anhydrite was present in many of the bentonite blocks of the ABM-II test. In most concepts used for HLRW disposal in crystalline rocks, a temperature below 100°C at the canister surface was applied to avoid boiling. In the ABM-II test, boiling of water was possibly observed. Throughout the experiment, a pressure/water loss was recorded in the upper part of the geotechnical barrier and water was added to maintain pressure in the bentonite. As a result of evaporation, NaCl crusts might have formed and the barrier was partly disintegrated. These results demonstrated that a reasonable assumption is that no boiling of water occurs in disposal concepts in which a pressure loss can occur.

Keywords

Buffer MaterialEngineered BarrierGeotechnical BarrierHard Rock LaboratoryHLRW-bentoniteIn situ Test
Type
Article
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals , Volume 65 , Issue 1 , February 2017 , pp. 27 - 41
Copyright
Copyright © Clay Minerals Society 2017

References

Baldermann, A D ^R K ^S N ^C L-P ^I ^M, 2014 The Fe-Mgsaponite solid solution series - a hydrothermal synthesis study Clay Minerals 49 391–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dohrmann, R. and Kaufhold, S., 2009 Three new, quick CEC methods for determining the amounts of exchangeable calcium cations in calcareous clays Clays and Clay Minerals 57 338–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dohrmann, R. and Kaufhold, S., 2014 Cation exchange and mineral reactions observed in MX 80 buffers samples of the prototype repository in situ experiment in Äspö, Sweden Clays and Clay Minerals 62 357–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dohrmann, R. and Kaufhold, S., 2017.Characterisation of the second parcel of the alternative buffer material ABM test - II Exchangeable cation population rearrangement Clays and Clay MineralsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dohrmann, R. Kaufhold, S. and Lundqvist, B., 2013a The role of clays for safe storage of nuclear waste Handbook of Clay Science, Techniques and Applications 5B 677–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dohrmann, R. Olsson, S. Kaufhold, S. and Sellin, P., 2013b Mineralogical investigations of the first package of the alternative buffer material test - II Exchangeable cation population rearrangement. Clay Minerals 48 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eng, A. Nilsson, U. and Svensson, D., 2007.Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory, Alternative Buffer Material Installation report IPR-07-15, 67 pGoogle Scholar
Grolimund, D. Wersin, P. Brendlé, J. Huve, J. Kiviranta, L. and Snellman, M., 2016 Interaction of titanium with smectite within the scope of a spent fuel repository: A spectroscopic approach Clay Minerals 51 249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heuser, M. Andrieux, P. Petit, S. and Stanjek, H., 2013 Iron-bearing smectites: a revised relationship between structural Fe, b cell edge lengths and refractive indices Clay Minerals 48 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufhold, S. and Dohrmann, R., 2010 Stability of bentonites in salt solutions II Potassium chloride solution - Initial step of illitization? Applied Clay Science 49 98–107.Google Scholar
Kaufhold, S. and Dohrmann, R., 2016 Assessment of parameters to distinguish suitable from less suitable highlevel- radioactive waste bentonites Clay Minerals 51 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufhold, S. Dohrmann, R. Koch, D. and Houben, G., 2008 The pH of aqueous bentonite suspensions Clays and Clay Minerals 56 338–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufhold, S. Dohrmann, R. Sandén, T. Sellin, P. and Svensson, D., 2013 Mineralogical investigations of the alternative buffer material test - I Alteration of bentonites. Clay Minerals 48 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufhold, S. Sanders, D. Dohrmann, R. and Hassel, A.-W., 2015 Fe corrosion in contact with bentonites Journal of Hazardous Materials 285 464–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufhold, S., Dohrmann, R., and Ufer, K. (2016). Interaction of magnesium cations with dioctahedral smectites under HLRW repository conditions. Clays and Clay Minerals, 64, 743–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karnland, O. Olsson, S. and Nilsson, U., 2007.Mineralogy and Sealing Properties of Various Bentonites and Smectiterich Clay MaterialsGoogle Scholar
Karnland, O. Olsson, S. Dueck, A. Birgersson, M. Nilsson, U. Hernan-Håkansson, T. Pedersen, K. Nilsson, S. Eriksen, T.E. and Rosborg, B., 2009.Long term test of buffer material at the Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory Final report on the A2 test parcelGoogle Scholar
Kumpulainen, S. and Kiviranta, L., 2011.Mineralogical, chemical and physical study of potential buffer and backfill materials from ABM test package 1Google Scholar
Kumpulainen, S. Kiviranta, L. and Korkeakoski, P., 2016 Long-term effects of Fe-heater and Äspö groundwater on smectite clays - Chemical and hydromechanical results from in-situ alternative buffer material (ABM) test package 2 Clay Minerals 51 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lantenois, S. Lanson, B. Muller, F. Bauer, A. Jullien, M. and Plançon, A., 2005 Experimental study of smectite interaction with metal Fe at low temperature: 1 Smectite destabilization. Clays and Clay Minerals 53 597–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosser-Ruck, R. Pironon, J. Cathelineau, M. and Trouiller, A., 2001 Experimental illitization of smectite in a K-rich solution European Journal of Mineralogy 13 829–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osacký, M. Šucha, V. A. Czímerová, A. and Madejová, J., 2010 Reaction of smectites with iron in a nitrogen atmosphere at 75141°C Applied Clay Science 50 237–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plötze, M. Kahr, G. Dohrmann, R. and Weber, H., 2007 Hydro-mechanical, geochemical and mineralogical characteristics of the bentonite buffer in a heater experiment The HE-B project at the Mont Terri rock laboratory. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 32 730–740.Google Scholar
Pusch, R B ^L F ^A J ^L-E H ^H K ^O ^T, 1995 The Buffer and Backfill Handbook Sweden. Clay Technology AB 95–45.Google Scholar
Samper, J., Naves, A., Montenegro, L., 2016.and Mon, A. Reactive transport modelling of the long-term interactions of corrosion products and compacted bentonite in a HLW repository in granite: Uncertainties and relevance for performance assessment. Applied Geochemistry, 67, 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellin, P. and Leupin, O., 2014 The use of clay as an engineered barrier 1 in radioactive waste management - a review Clays and Clay Minerals 61 477–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sena, C., Salas, J., and Arcos, D. (2010) Thermo-hydrogeochemical modelling of the bentonite buffer LOT A2 experiment. Technical Report TR-10-65. Available online at: .Google Scholar
Svensson, D. Dueck, A. Olsson, S. Sandeén, T. Lydmark, S. Jägerwall, S. Pedersen, K. and Hansen, S., 2011.Alternative Buffer Material - Status of Ongoing Laboratory Investigations of Reference Materials and Test Package 1Google Scholar
Svensson, D., 2013 Early observations in a large scale 6½ year iron-bentonite field experiment (ABM2) at Äspö hard rock laboratory, Sweden 50th Annual Meeting of The Clay Minerals Society, October 6–10. Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, U.S.A., Abstracts 233–244.Google Scholar
Svensson, D. and Hansen, S., 2013 Redox chemistry in two iron-bentonite field experiments at Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory, Sweden: An XRD and Fe K-edge XANES study Clays and Clay Minerals 61 566–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svensson, D., 2015.Saponite formation in the ABM2 ironbentonite field experiment at Äspö hard rock laboratory, Sweden Clays in Natural and Engineered Barriers for Radioactive Waste Confinement, 6th International Conference, Brussels, March 23-26Google Scholar
Wallis, I. Idiart, A. Dohrmann, R. and Post, V., 2016 The ABM1 test - a reactive transport model of the influence of groundwater on the CEC distribution in bentonite clays Applied Geochemistry 73 59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wersin, P. Jenni, A. and Mäder, U.K., 2015 Interaction of corroding iron with bentonite in the ABM1 experiment at Äspö, Sweden: a microscopic approach Clays and Clay Minerals 63 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. Savage, D. Cuadros, J. Shibata, M. and Ragnarsdottir, K.V., 2006a The effect of iron on montmorillonite stability (I) Background and thermodynamic considerations. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 70 306–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. Cressey, G. Cressey, B. Cuadros, J. Ragnarsdottir, K.V. Savage, D. and Shibata, M., 2006b The effect of iron on montmorillonite stability (II) Experimental investigation. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 70 323–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar