Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:54:23.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Heating on Swelling and Dispersion of Different Cationic Forms of a Smectite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

M. Chorom  and
P. Rengasamy
M. Chorom
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science, Waite Agricultural Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, Australia
P. Rengasamy
Affiliation:
Co-operative Research Centre for Soil and Land Management, P.M. Bag No. 1, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The effect of heat treatments on the swelling, dispersion, particle charge and particle aggregation of Li-, Na-, K-, Mg-, Ca- and Al-Wyoming bentonite was investigated. Before thermal treatment, unheated (25 °C) Li-, Na- and K-clays showed increased d001 spacing on glycerol solvation and dispersed spontaneously in water. Mg-, Ca- and Al-clays did not disperse spontaneously in water, but the d001 spacing increased upon glycerol solvation. After heating at 300 °C or above, none of these clays dispersed spontaneously. However, swelling varied with the type of cation and the temperature of heating.

The results generally suggested that swelling and dispersion of homoionic Wyoming bentonite after heating at various temperatures depended upon the nature of bonding between clay particles and the cations. Enhanced swelling and dispersion of clays indicated the more ionic character of the cationic bonding than cases where heating resulted only in swelling, with polar covalent bonding of cations to clay surfaces allowing limited hydration. It is also suggested that, when both swelling and dispersion as a result of thermal treatment are absent, a covalent bond is formed between cation and clay surface.

Thermal treatment apparently affects the bonding in different ways. It appears that the smaller cations (ionic radius <0.7 Å) Li, Mg and Al migrate to octahedral vacant sites and form covalent bonds after heating at 400 °C; this drastically reduces the negative charge. This process for Li-clays occurred even at 200 °C. The larger cations (ionic radius > 0.9 Å) Na, K and Ca apparently did not migrate into the lattice sites after heating to 400 °C; a high proportion of them were exchangeable. The data for exchangeable cation, particle charge and clay particle size were consistent with the postulated effect of the nature of cationic bonding upon swelling and dispersion properties.

Keywords

Cationic Clay BondingDispersionParticle ChargeSwellingThermal TreatmentX-ray Diffraction
Type
Research Article
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals , Volume 44 , Issue 6 , December 1996 , pp. 783 - 790
Copyright
Copyright © 1996, The Clay Minerals Society

References

Calvet, R. and Prost, R.. 1971. Cation migration into empty octahedral sites and surface properties of clays. Clays Clay Miner 19: 175–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chorom, M. and Rengasamy, P.. 1995. Dispersion and zeta potential of pure clays as related to net particle charge under varying pH, electrolyte concentration and cation type. Eur J Soil Sci 46: 657–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chorom, M., Rengasamy, P. and Murray, R.S.. 1994. Clay dispersion as influenced by pH and net particle charge of sodic soils. Aust J Soil Res 32: 1243–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christenson, H.K. and Horn, R.G.. 1985. Solvation forces measured in non-aqueous liquids. Chemica Scripta 25: 37–41.Google Scholar
Glaeser, R. and Mering, J.. 1968. Homogeneous hydration domains of the smectites. CR Acad Sci Paris 46: 436–466.Google Scholar
Greene-Kelly, R.. 1955. Dehydration of the montmorillonite minerals. Mineral Mag 30: 604–615.Google Scholar
Hofmann, U. and Klemen, R.. 1950. Effect of heating on Li-bentonite: Z Anorg Allg Chem 262: 95–99.Google Scholar
Horvath, I. and Novak, I.. 1975. Potassium fixation and the charge of montmorillonite layer. In: Bailey, S.W., editor. Proceedings of the International Clay Conference; Mexico City. Wilmette, Illinois: Applied Publishing, p 185–189.Google Scholar
Huheey, J.E., Keiter, E.A. and Keiter, R.L.. 1994. Inorganic chemistry. New York: Harper Collins. p 130–135.Google Scholar
Israelachvili, J.N. and McGuiggan, P.M.. 1988. Forces between surfaces in liquids. Science 241: 795–800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, M.L.. 1969. Soil chemical analysis—advanced course. 5th printing. Madison, WI: ML Jackson, Univ of Wisconsin. 894 p.Google Scholar
Jaynes, W.F. and Bigham, J.M.. 1987. Charge reduction, octahedral charge, and lithium retention in heated, Li-saturated smectites. Clays Clay Miner 35: 440–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, H.D.B. and Hartman, P.. 1982. A new approach to electrostatic calculations for complex silicate structures and their application to vermiculites containing a single layer of water molecules. In: van Olphen, H. and Veniale, F., editors. Proceedings of the Internationa] Clay Conference; 1981; Bologna, Pavia. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. p 87–95.Google Scholar
Lim, C.H. and Jackson, M.L.. 1986. Expandable phyllosilicate reactions with lithium on heating. Clays Clay Miner 34: 346–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, P.F.. 1981. The swelling of clay: III. Dissociation of exchangeable cations. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45: 1074–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misono, M., Ochiai, E., Saito, Y. and Yoneda, Y.. 1967. A new dual parameter scale for the strength of Lewis acids and bases with the evaluation of their softness. J Inorg Nucl Chem 29: 2685–2691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pashley, R.M.. 1985. Electromobility of mica particles dispersed in aqueous solutions. Clays Clay Miner 33: 193–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rengasamy, P. and Sumner, M.E.. 1996. Processes involved in sodic behaviour. In: Sumner, M.E. and Naidu, R., editors. Sodic soils: distribution, processes, management and environmental consequences. New York: Oxford Univ Pr. 265 p.Google Scholar
Sato, T., Watanabe, T. and Otsuka, R.. 1992. Effects of layer charge, charge location, and energy change on expansion properties of dioctahedral smectites. Clays Clay Miner 40: 103–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, L.G.. 1969. Lithium and potassium adsorption; dehydroxylation temperature, and structural water content of aluminous smectites. Clays Clay Miner 17: 113–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slade, P.G., Quirk, J.P. and Norrish, K.. 1991. Crystalline swelling of smectite samples in concentrated NaCl solutions in relation to layer charge. Clays Clay Miner 39: 234–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suquet, H., De la Calle, C. and Pezerat, H.. 1975. Swelling and structural organization of saponite. Clays Clay Miner 23: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tettenhorst, R.T.. 1962. Cation migration in montmorillonites. Am Mineral 47: 769–773.Google Scholar
van Oss, C.J., Giese, R.F. and Costanzo, P.M.. 1990. DLVO and non-DLVO interactions in hectorite. Clays Clay Miner 38: 151–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar