Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T13:43:16.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mössbauer Spectroscopic Evidence for Citrate-Bicarbonate-Dithionite Extraction of Maghemite from Soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

M. J. Singer ,
L. H. Bowen ,
K. L. Verosub ,
P. Fine  and
J. TenPas
M. J. Singer
Affiliation:
Department of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, California, 95616
L. H. Bowen
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27695
K. L. Verosub
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of California, Davis, California, 95616
P. Fine
Affiliation:
Institute of Soils and Water, Volcani Center, Bet Degan, Israel
J. TenPas
Affiliation:
Department of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, California, 95616
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In a previous paper, we used powder X-ray diffraction and changes in magnetic susceptibility to argue the importance of pedogenic maghemite to soils and the efficacy of the chemical extractant citrate-bicarbonate-dithionite (CBD) to preferentially remove pedogenic maghemite from soil samples while not removing coarse-grained magnetite. Although X-ray diffraction provides strong support for this contention, Mössbauer spectroscopy is the method of choice for determining the oxidation state of iron in minerals and for inferring mineralogy of the iron oxide phases. Our objective in this work was to seek confirming evidence of the importance of maghemite as a pedogenic mineral and the usefulness of the CBD procedure in separating pedogenic maghemite from lithogenic magnetite. We present Mössbauer data on magnetic fractions from pre- and post-CBD treated soil samples. Six of the 10 samples had only maghemite as the sextet component and after CBD treatment, four lost between 96 and 100% of the magnetic susceptibility. Two samples were interpreted as highly oxidized magnetite or a mixture of magnetite and maghemite. We cannot distinguish between these with Mössbauer spectroscopy. In the remaining two samples, iron existed as hematite, ilmenite, magnetite and minor (<10%) amounts of maghemite. Our results provide additional support for pedogenic maghemite in soils and for the preferential removal of maghemite by the CBD procedure.

Keywords

Mössbauer spectroscopySoil genesis
Type
Research Article
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , February 1995 , pp. 1 - 7
Copyright
Copyright © 1995, The Clay Minerals Society

References

Amarasiriwardena, D. D., Grave, E. De, Bowen, L. H., and Weed, S. B. 1986 . Quantitative determination of aluminum-substituted goethite-hematite mixtures by Mössbauer spectroscopy. Clays & Clay Miner. 34: 250–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busacca, A. J., 1982. Geologic history and soil development, northeastern Sacramento Valley, California: Ph.D. dissertation. University of California: Davis.Google Scholar
Fine, P., and Singer, M. J. 1989 . Contribution of ferrimagnetic minerals to oxalate- and dithionite-extractable iron. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 53: 191–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, P., Singer, M. J., LaVen, R., Verosub, K., and Southard, R. J. 1989 . Role of pedogenesis in contributing to magnetic susceptibility distribution in soils. Geoderma 44: 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, F., and Liu, T. S. 1984 . Magnetism of Chinese loess deposits. Geophysical J. 77: 125–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kukla, G., Heller, F., Liu, X. M., Xu, T. C., Liu, T. S., and An, Z. S. 1988 . Pleistocene climates in China dated by magnetic susceptibility. Geology 16: 811–814.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Borgne, E., 1955. Susceptibilité magnétique anormale du sol superficiel. Annales de Géophysique 11: 399–419.Google Scholar
Liu, X., Shaw, J., Liu, T., Heller, F., and Baoyin, Y. 1992 . Magnetic mineralogy of Chinese loess and its significance. Geophys. J. Int. 108: 301–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longworth, G., Becker, L. W., Thompson, R., Oldfield, F., Dearing, J. A., and Rummery, T. A. 1979 . Mössbauer effect and magnetic studies of secondary iron oxides in soils. J. Soil Sci. 30: 93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maher, B. A., and Taylor, R. M. 1988 . Formation of ultrafine-grained magnetite in soils. Nature 336: 368–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehra, O. P., and Jackson, M. L. 1960 . Iron oxide removal from soils and clays by a dithionite-citrate system buffered with sodium bicarbonate. Clays & Clay Miner. 7: 317–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullins, C. E., 1977. Magnetic susceptibility of the soil and its significance in soil science—A review. J. Soil Sci. 28: 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murad, E., and Johnston, J. H. Iron oxides and oxyhydroxides. In Mössbauer Spectroscopy Applied to Inorganic Chemistry. Long, G. J., 1987 ed. 2: 507–582. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Oldfield, F., 1991. Sediment magnetism: Soil erosion, bushfires, or bacteria? Geology 19: 1155–1156.Google Scholar
Özdemir, Ö., Dunlop, D. J., and Moskowitz, B. M. 1993 . The effect of oxidation on the Verwey transition in magnetite. Geophys. Res. Lett. 20: 1671–1674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwertmann, U., 1988. Occurrence and formation of iron oxides in various pedoenvironments. In Iron in Soils and Clay Minerals. Stucki, J. W., Goodman, B. A., and Schwertmann, U., eds. NATO ASI Series 217: 267–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, M. J., and Fine, P. 1989 . Pedogenic factors affecting magnetic susceptibility of northern California soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 53: 1119–1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, M. J., Fine, P., Verosub, K. L., and Chadwick, O. A. 1992 . Time dependence of magnetic susceptibility of soil chronosequences on the California coast. Quat. Res. 37: 323–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verosub, K. L., Fine, P., Singer, M. J., and TenPas, J. 1993 . Pedogenesis and paleoclimate: Interpretation of the magnetic susceptibility record of Chinese loess-paleosol sequences. Geology 21: 1011–1014.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, L. P., Oldfield, F., Wintle, A. G., Robinson, S. G., and Wang, J. T. 1990 . Partly pedogenic origin of magnetic variations in Chinese loess. Nature 346: 737–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar