Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:19:59.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Potential-Distance Relationships of Clay-Water Systems Considering the Stern Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

A. Sridharan  and
P. V. Satyamurty
A. Sridharan
Affiliation:
Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012, India
P. V. Satyamurty
Affiliation:
Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012, India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper deals with the use of Stern theory as applied to a clay-water electrolyte system, which is more realistic to understand the force system at micro level than the Gouy-Chapman theory. The influence of the Stern layer on potential-distance relationship has been presented quantitatively for certain specified clay-water systems and the results are compared with the Gouy-Chapman model. A detailed parametric study concerning the number of adsorption spots on the clay platelet, the thickness of the Stern layer, specific adsorption potential and the value of dielectric constant of the pore fluid in the Stern layer, was carried out. This study investigates that the potential obtained at any distance using the Stern theory is higher than that obtained by the Gouy-Chapman theory. The hydrated size of the ion is found to have a significant influence on the potential- distance relationship for a given clay, pore fluid characteristics and valence of the exchangeable ion.

Keywords

Cation SizeClay MineralsDiffuse Double LayerElectric PotentialStern Theory
Type
Research Article
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , August 1996 , pp. 479 - 484
Copyright
Copyright © 1996, The Clay Minerals Society

References

Bolt, G.H.. 1956. Physicochemical analysis of compressibility of pure clays geotechnique. London: Institution of Civil Engineers. 6: 86–93.Google Scholar
Conway, B.E., JO'M, Bockris and Ammar, I.A.. 1951. The Dielectric constant of the solution in the diffuse and helmholtz interface in aqueous solution. Trans Faraday Soc. London 47: 756–766.Google Scholar
Cownie, A. and Palmer, L.S.. 1952. The effect of moisture on the electrical properties of soil. Proc Phys Soc London 65B: 295–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grim, R.E.. 1962. Applied clay mineralogy. New York: McGraw-Hill. 422 p.Google Scholar
Lambe, T.W. and Whitman, R.W.. 1969. Soil mechanics. New Delhi: Wiley Eastern. 553 p.Google Scholar
Low, P.F.. 1959. Discussion on physio-chemical properties of soils: Ion exchange phenomena. J Soil Mech & Found Div ASCE 85, No. SM 2: 79 p.Google Scholar
Mitchel, J.K.. 1976. Fundamentals of soil behaviour. New York: John Wiley. 422 p.Google Scholar
Olsen, R.E. and Mesri, G.. 1970. Mechanisms controlling compressibility of clays. J Soil Mech & Found Div ASCE: 96, No. SM6: 1863–1878.Google Scholar
Palmer, L.S.. 1952. Dielectric constant of water in wet clay, Proc Phys Soc London 65B: 674–678.Google Scholar
Palmer, L.S., Cunliffe, A. and Hough, J.M.. 1952. Dielectric constants of water films. Nature 170: 796 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sridharan, A.. 1968. Some studies on the strength of partly saturated clays. [Ph.D. Thesis]. West Lafayette: Purdue University. 179 p.Google Scholar
Sridharan, A. and Jayadeva, M.S.. 1982. Double layer theory and compressibility of clays. Geotechnique (London) 32: 133–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Olphen, H.. 1963. Clay colloid chemistry. New York: Interscience. 301 p.Google Scholar
Verwey, E.J.W. and JThG, Overbeek. 1948. Theory of the stability of the lyophobic colloids. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 205 p.Google Scholar