Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:51:25.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Smectite Clay Sequestration of Aflatoxin B1: Particle Size and Morphology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

I. Mulder
Affiliation:
Soil and Crop Sciences Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-2474, USA
A. L. Barrientos Velazquez
Affiliation:
Soil and Crop Sciences Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-2474, USA
M. G. Tenorio Arvide
Affiliation:
Soil and Crop Sciences Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-2474, USA
G. N. White
Affiliation:
Soil and Crop Sciences Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-2474, USA
J. B. Dixon*
Affiliation:
Soil and Crop Sciences Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-2474, USA
*
* E-mail address of corresponding author: j-dixon@tamu.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The properties that might influence the sequestration of aflatoxin B1 (AfB1) were examined. Laser-diffraction, particle-size analysis (LDPSA) indicated that the particle size of the smectite influences the amount of AfB1 adsorbed. Effective adsorbent smectites disperse well under combined sodium hexametaphosphate solution and ultrasonic agitation. Particle size explained 66% of the variability for most of the samples investigated in an ‘as-received’ state. One effective adsorbent smectite was especially well aggregated and required additional physical dispersion, thus raising the correlation to 73%. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) images show typical smectites and reveal the very diverse morphology of smectites in bentonites. Thin, cloud-like smectite, in TEM images, related positively to AfB1-adsorption capacity. Particles that often fold and are usually ∼0.5 µm across seem to be optimal. The selection of criteria for evaluating these smectites provides a scientific basis for their selection to obtain reliable performance. Particle size is of particular importance as outlined below, and use of LDPSA makes it possible to perform the analysis efficiently and with precision.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Clay Minerals Society 2009

References

Borchardt, G. 1989 Smectites Pp. 675–728 in: Minerals in Soil Environments Dixon, J. B. and Weed, S. B., Madison, Wisconsin Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Desheng, Q. Fan, L. Yanhu, Y. and Niya, Z., 2005 Adsorption of aflatoxin B1 on montmorillonite Poultry Science 84 959961 10.1093/ps/84.6.959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dixon, J.B. Moore, D.E. Agnihotri, N.P. and Lewis, D.E., 1970 Exchange of Diquat (2+) in soil clays, vermiculite, and smectite Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 34 805808 10.2136/sssaj1970.03615995003400050037x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, J.B. Kannewischer, I. Tenorio Arvide, M.G. and Barrientos Velásquez, A.L., 2008 Aflatoxin sequestration in animal feeds by quality-labeled smectite clays: An introductory plan Applied Clay Science 40 201208 10.1016/j.clay.2007.10.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Essington, M.E., 2004 Soil and Water Chemistry — An Integrative Approach Boca Raton, Florida, USA CRC Press 10.1201/b12397.Google Scholar
Galán, E., and Bergaya, F. et al. 2006, Genesis of clay minerals Handbook of Clay Science Amsterdam Elsevier 11291162 10.1016/S1572-4352(05)01042-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grim, R.E., 1962 Applied Clay Mineralogy New York McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc. 10.1080/11035896209447314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grim, R.E. and Güven, N., 1978 Bentonites: Geology, Mineralogy, Properties and Uses Amsterdam Elsevier.Google Scholar
Holzenburg, A. Flint, T.D. Shepherd, F.H. and Ford, R.C., 1996 Photosystem II: Mapping the location of the oxygen evolution-enhancing subunits by electron microscopy Micron 27 121127 10.1016/0968-4328(96)00025-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M.L., 2005 Soil Chemical Analysis — Advanced Course 2 Madison, Wisconsin, USA Parallel Press, University of Wisconsin, Madison Libraries.Google Scholar
Kannewischer, I. Tenorio Arvide, M.G. White, G.N. and Dixon, J.B., 2006 Smectite clays as adsorbents of Aflatoxin B1: Initial Steps Clay Science, Japan 12 199204 Supplement 2.Google Scholar
Kunze, G.W. and Dixon, J.B., 1986 Pretreatment for mineralogical analysis Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods Madison, Wisconsin American Society of Agronomy-Soil Science Society of America 91100.Google Scholar
Lee, K.-M. Herrman, T.J. Langenfelser, J. and Jackson, D.S., 2005 Classification and prediction of maize hardness-associated properties using multivariate statistical analyses Journal of Cereal Science 41 8593 10.1016/j.jcs.2004.09.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malla, P.B., Dixon, J.B. and Schulze, D.G., 2002 Vermiculites Soil Mineralogy with Environmental Applications Madison, Wisconsin Soil Science Society of America 501530.Google Scholar
Mering, J. and Oberlin, A., 1967 Electron-optical study of smectites Clays and Clay Minerals 15 325 10.1346/CCMN.1967.0150102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavao, A.C. Neto, L.A.S. Neto, J.F. and Leão, M.B.C., 1995 Structure and activity of aflatoxins B and G Journal of Molecular Structure: THEOCHEM 337 5760 10.1016/0166-1280(94)04104-Z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, T.D., 1999 Dietary clay in the chemoprevention of aflatoxin-induced disease Toxicological Sciences 52 118126 10.1093/toxsci/52.suppl_1.118 (Supplement).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, T.D. Sarr, A.B. and Grant, P.G., 1995 Selective chemisorption and detoxification of alflatoxins by phyllosilicate clay Natural Toxins 3 204213 10.1002/nt.2620030407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, T.D. Lemke, S.L. and Grant, P.G., 2002 Characterization of clay-based enterosorbents for the prevention of aflatoxicosis Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 504 157171 10.1007/978-1-4615-0629-4_16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reid-Soukup, D.A. Ulery, A.L., Dixon, J.B. and Schulze, D.G., 2002 Smectites Soil Mineralogy with Environmental Applications Madison, Wisconsin Soil Science Society of America 467500.Google Scholar
Sarr, A.B. Clement, B.A. and Phillips, T.D., 1991 Molecular mechanism of aflatoxin B1 chemisorption by hydrated sodium calcium aluminosilicate (abstract) Toxicologist 7 97.Google Scholar
Senkayi, A.L. Dixon, J.B. Hossner, L.R. and Kippenberger, L.A., 1985 Layer charge evaluation of expandable soil clays by an alkylammonium method Soil Science Society of America Journal 49 10541060 10.2136/sssaj1985.03615995004900040052x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, A., Dixon, J.B. and Schulze, D.G., 2002 Palygorskite and sepiolite Soil Mineralogy with Environmental Applications Madison, Wisconsin Soil Science Society of America 555583.Google Scholar
Tenorio Arvide, M.G. Mulder, I. Barrientos Velazquez, A.L. and Dixon, J.B., 2008 Smectite clay adsorption of aflatoxin versus octahedral composition, as indicated by FTIR Clays and Clay Minerals 56 571578 10.1346/CCMN.2008.0560510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbanek, R., 1997 Syntheses and Mechanistic Studies of the Potent Mycotoxin Aflatoxin B1 Student seminar program for organic and biological specialty areas USA Department of Chemistry, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
White, J.L., Dixon, J.B. and Weed, S.B., 1977 Preparations of specimens for infrared analysis Minerals in Soil Environments Madison, Wisconsin, USA Soil Science Society of America 847863.Google Scholar
White, G.N. and Dixon, J.B., 2003 Soil Mineralogy Laboratory Manual 9th College Station, Texas 77843-2474, USA Published by the authors, Department of Soil and Crop Sciences. Texas A&M University.Google Scholar