Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:11:38.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sorption Mechanisms of Lanthanum on Oxide Minerals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Scott Fendorf  and
Mark Fendorf
Scott Fendorf
Affiliation:
Soil Science Division, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844
Mark Fendorf
Affiliation:
National Center for Electron Microscopy, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Rd, Berkeley, California 94720
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The retention of hazardous species, including many of the lanthanides, on soils and sediments is vital for maintaining environmental quality. In this study, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) was used to identify surface precipitates of La and their degree of atomic ordering on oxides of Mn (birnessite), Fe (goethite) and Ti (rutile) over a pH range of 3 to 8. At pH >5.5, the aqueous concentration of La was fully depleted by all three metal-oxides. On birnessite, surface precipitation of La-hydroxide occurred at pH = 5 and appears to be the dominant sorption mechanism on this mineral. Surface precipitation was not observed on rutile or goethite until much higher pH values, 6.5 for rutile and 8.0 for goethite. Precipitation is thus correlated with the points of zero charge (PZC) of the minerals, 6.3 for rutile and 7.8 for goethite, and in each case was observed only at pH values above the PZC. Although La sorption was extensive on all of the minerals at the higher pHs, the depletion of La from solution by rutile and goethite at pH values well below the PZC indicates that the sorption mechanism differs from that on birnessite. While surface precipitation was found to be the dominant sorption mechanism of La on birnessite, surface complexation of monomelic or small multinuclear species appears to predominate in La retention on rutile and goethite at most commonly encountered pH values.

Keywords

Electron microscopyLanthanumMetal-oxidesSorption
Type
Research Article
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , April 1996 , pp. 220 - 227
Copyright
Copyright © 1996, The Clay Minerals Society

References

Akeson, M.A., Munns, D.N. and Burau, R.G.. 1989. Adsorption of Al3+ to phosphatidylcholine vesicles. Biochim Biophys Acta 986: 33–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atkinson, R.J., Posner, A.M. and Quirk, J.P.. 1968. Crystal nucleation in Fe(III) solutions and hydroxide gels. J Inorg Nucl Chem 30: 2371–2381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brookings, D.G.. 1984. Geochemical aspects of radioactive waste disposal. New York: Springer)-Verlag. p. 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fendorf, S.E., Fendorf, M., Gronsky, R. and Sparks, D.L.. 1992. Surface precipitation reactions on oxide surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 148: 295–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fendorf, S.E., Lamble, G.M., Stapleton, M.G., Sparks, D.L. and Kelley, M.J.. 1994. Chrommm(III) sorption on silica. 1: The surface structure derived from extended x-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy. Environ Sci Technol 28: 284–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fendorf, S.E. and Zasoski, R.J.. 1992. Chromium(III) oxidation by δ-MnO2: I. Characterization. Environ Sci Technol 26: 79–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, K.F. and Leckie, J.O.. 1986. Mechanisms of lead ion sorption at the goethite/water interface. In: Davis, J.A., Hayes, K.F., editors. Geochemical processes at mineral surfaces. ACS Symp. 323. Meet. Am. Chem. Soc. Washington, DC. p. 141–148.Google Scholar
Heilman, M.C., Carter, D.L. and Gonzalez, C.L.. 1965. The ethylene glycol monoethyl ether (EGME) technique for determining soil-surface area. Soil Science 100: 409–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochella, M.F. Jr. 1990. Atomic structure, microtopography, composition, and reactivity of mineral surfaces. In: Hochella, M.F., White, A.F., editors. Mineral-water interface geochemistry, Vol. 23, Reviews in mineralogy. Washington, DC: Mineralogical Society of America. p. 87–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, R.O. and Healy, T.W.. 1972a. Adsorption of hydrolyzable metal ions at the oxide-water interface: II. Charge reversal of SiO2 and TiO2 colloids by adsorbed Co(II), La, and Th(IV) as model systems. J Colloid Interface Sci 40: 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, R.O. and Healy, T.W.. 1972b. Adsorption of hydrolyzable metal ions at the oxide-water interface: II. A thermodynamic model of adsorption. J Colloid Interface Sci 40: 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, R.M.. 1977. Manganese oxides and hydroxides. In: Dixon, J.B., editor. Minerals in the soil environment. Madison, WI: Soil Sci Soc Am. p. 181–193.Google Scholar
Murray, J.W. and Dillard, J.G.. 1979. The oxidation of cobalt(II) adsorbed on manganese dioxide. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 43: 781–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rard, J.A.. 1988. Aqueous solubilities of praseodymium, europium and lutetium sulfates. J Sol Chem 17: 499–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schindler, P.W. and Stumm, W.. 1987. The surface chemistry of oxides, hydroxides, and oxyhydroxide minerals. In: Stumm, W., editor. Aquatic surface chemistry. NY: Wiley and Sons. p. 83–110.Google Scholar
Smith, R.M. and Martell, A.E.. 1976. Critical stability constants: Inorganic complexes. NY: Plenum Press). p. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar