Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:53:18.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Why Does Halloysite Roll?—A New Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Balbir Singh*
Affiliation:
Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis, The University of Queensland Brisbane, Qld. 4072, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A model is presented to explain why tubular halloysite rolls in preference to tetrahedral rotation to correct misfit of the octahedral and tetrahedral sheets. It is shown that the rolling mechanism operates as it encounters significantly less resistance from Si-Si repulsion in comparison to tetrahedral rotation to correct the same amount of misfit. The model explains the observed and experimental rolling of planar kaolinites to form tubular halloysite upon hydration and exfoliation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1996, The Clay Minerals Society

References

Bailey, S.W.. 1980. Kaolin minerals. In.Brindley GW, Brown G, editors. Crystal structures of clay minerals and their X-ray identification. London: Mineralogical Society. 1123.Google Scholar
Bailey, S.W.. 1988. Polytypism of 1: 1 layer silicate. In: Bailey, S.W., editor. Hydrous phyllosilicates (exclusive of mica). MSA Reviews in Mineralogy 19: 927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, S.W.. 1989. Halloysite—A critical assessment. In: Farmer, V.C., Tardy, Y., editors. Proc. Int. Clay Conf. Strasbourg, France. Sci Geol Mem 86: 8998.Google Scholar
Banfield, J.F. and Eggleton, R.A.. 1990. Analytical transmission electron microscope studies of plagioclase, muscovite, and K-feldspar weathering. Clays & Clay Miner 38: 7789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, T.F., Hildebrand, F.A. and Swineford, A.. 1950. Morphology and structure of endellite and halloysite. Am Mineral 6: 237248.Google Scholar
Churchman, G.J. and Gilkes, R.J.. 1989. Recognition of intermediates in the possible transformation of halloysite to kaolinite in weathering profiles. Clay Miner 24: 579590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costanzo, P.M. and Giese, R.F. Jr. 1985. Dehydration of synthetic hydrated kaolinite: a model for dehydration of halloysite (10Å). Clays & Clay Miner 33: 415423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giese, R.F. Jr. 1988. Kaolin minerals: Structures and stablities. In: Bailey, S.W., editor. Hydrous phyllosilicates (exclusive of micas). MSA Reviews in Mineralogy 19: 2966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, R., Childs, C. and Churchman, J.. 1994. Aluminium coordination and structural disorder in halloysite and kaolinite by 27Al NMR spectroscopy. Clays & Clay Miner 29: 305312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radoslovich, E.W.. 1963a. The cell dimensions and symmetry of layer-lattice silicate. IV. Inter atomic forces. Am Mineral 48: 7699.Google Scholar
Radoslovich, E.W.. 1963b. The cell dimensions and symmetry of layer-lattice silicate. VI. Serpentine and kaolin morphology. Am Mineral 48: 368378.Google Scholar
Robertson, I.D.M. and Eggleton, R.A.. 1991. Weathering of granitic muscovite to kaolinite and halloysite and of plagioclase-derived kaolinite to halloysite. Clays & Clay Miner 39: 113126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balbir, Singh and Gilkes, R.J.. 1991. Weathering of chromian muscovite to kaolinite. Clays & Clay Miner 39: 571579.Google Scholar
Balbir, Singh and Gilkes, R.J.. 1992. An electron-optical investigation of the alteration of kaolinite to halloysite. Clays & Clay Miner 40: 212229.Google Scholar
Balbir, Singh and Mackinnon, I.D.R.. personal communication. Center for Microscopy and Microanalysis. The University of Queensland. Brisbane, Qld. 4072, Australia.Google Scholar
Tazaki, K.. 1982. Analytical electron microscopic studies of halloysite formation- morphology and composition of halloysite. Proc. 7th Int. Clay Conf., Italy 573584.Google Scholar