Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T10:00:18.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effectiveness and Safety of Epilepsy Surgery: What is the Evidence?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2014

Samuel Wiebe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Evidence from a recent randomized controlled trial of surgical versus medical therapy of temporal lobe epilepsy proves that antero'mesial resection is safe and more effective than medical therapy. The number of patients needed to treat for one patient to become free of disabling seizures is two, which is superior to most interventions in neurology. A meta-analysis of non-randomized trials gives almost identical results; about two-thirds of patients become seizure-free, compared with only 8% with medical therapy. The results are remarkably similar among studies from different parts of the world. Quality of life improves early after epilepsy surgery, the improvements are both statistically and clinically significant, and they are sustained. Surgical morbidity with clinically important permanent sequelae is 2%. Epilepsy surgery remains underutilized in developed countries and it does not exist in all but a few developing countries. Current randomized trials are underway to explore the effect of early surgery versus optimum medical therapy on the prevention of disability in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy, and to examine the effectiveness of novel interventions, such as minimally invasive surgery and brain stimulation.

Type
Review Article
Information
CNS Spectrums , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , February 2004 , pp. 120 - 132
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Engel, J Jr.Update on Surgical Treatment of the Epilepsies: Summary of the Second International Palm Desert Conference on the Surgical Treatment of the Epilepsies (1992). Neurology. 1993;43:1612–1617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Guyatt, G, Haynes, B, Jaeschke, R, et al.Introduction: the philosophy of evidence based medicine. In: Guyatt, G, Rennie, D, eds. Users' Guides to the Medical Literature. A manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice. 1 ed. Chicago, Ill: American Medical Association; 2002:3–12.Google Scholar
3.Miao, LL. Gastric freezing: an example of the evaluation of medical therapy by randomized clinical trials. In: Bunker, JP, Barnes, BA, Mosteller, F, eds. Costs, Risks and Benefits of Surgery. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1977:198–211.Google Scholar
4.Sacks, H, Chalmers, TC, Smith, H Jr.Randomized versus historical controls for clinical trials. Am J Med. 1982;72:233–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Barsamian, EM. The rise and fall of internal mammary artery ligation in the treatment of angina pectoris and the lessons learned. In: Bunker, JP, Barnes, BA, Mosteller, F, eds. Costs, Risks and Benefits of Surgery. 1 ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1977:212–220.Google Scholar
6.The EC/IC Bypass Study Group. Failure of extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1985;313:1191–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Ioannidis, JP, Haidich, AB, Pappa, M, et al.Comparison of evidence of treatment effects in randomized and nonrandomized studies. JAMA. 2001;286:821–830.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Schulz, KF, Chalmers, I, Hayes, RJ, Altman, DG. Empirical evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA. 1995;273:408–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Benson, K, Hartz, AJ. A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1878–1886.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Concato, J, Shah, N, Horwitz, RI. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1887–1892.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Sackett, DL. Bias in analytic research. J Chronic Dis. 1979;32:51–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.McLeod, RS. Issues in surgical randomized controlled trials. World J Surg. 1999;23:1210–1214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Dasheiff, RM, Ryan, CW, Lave, JR. Epilepsy brain surgery: a Pittsburgh perspective. Seizure. 1994;3:197–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.A global survey on epilepsy surgery, 1980–1990: a report by the Commission on Neurosurgery of Epilepsy, the International League Against Epilepsy. Epilepsia. 1997;38:249–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Salinsky, MC, The Vagus Nerve Stimulation Study Group. A randomized controlled trial of chronic vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of medically intractable seizures. Neurology. 1995;45:224–230.Google Scholar
16.Handforth, A, DeGiorgio, CM, Schachter, SC, et al.Vagus nerve stimulation therapy for partial-onset seizures: a randomized active-control trial. Neurology. 1998;51:48–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Amar, AP, Heck, CN, Levy, ML, et al.An institutional experience with cervical vagus nerve trunk stimulation for medically refractory epilepsy: rationale, technique, and outcome. Neurosurgery. 1998;43:1265–1276.Google ScholarPubMed
18.Scherrmann, J, Hoppe, C, Kral, T, Schramm, J, Eiger, CE. Vagus nerve stimulation: clinical experience in a large patient series. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;18:408–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Wyler, AR, Hermann, BP, Somes, G. Extent of medial temporal resection on outcome from anterior temporal lobectomy: a randomized prospective study. Neurosurgery. 1995;37:982–990.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Hermann, B, Davies, K, Foley, K, Bell, K. Visual confrontation naming outcome after standard left anterior temporal lobectomy with sparing versus resection of the superior temporal gyrus: a randomized prospective clinical trial. Epilepsia. 1999;40:1070–1076.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Wiebe, S, Blume, WT, Girvin, JP, Eliasziw, M. A randomized, controlled trial of surgery for temporal-lobe epilepsy. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:311–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Engel, J JrWiebe, S, French, J, et al.Practice parameter: temporal lobe and localized neocortical resections for epilepsy: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology, in Association with the American Epilepsy Society and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons. Neurology. 2003;60:538–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Baker, GA, Smith, DF, Jacoby, A, Hayes, JA, Chadwick, DW. Liverpool Seizure Severity Scale revisited. Seizure. 1998;7:201–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Wiebe, S, Matijevic, S, Eliasziw, M, Derry, PA. Clinically important change in quality of life in epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73:116–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Wiebe, S, Matijevic, S, Eliasziw, M, Blume, WT, Girvin, J. Randomized controlled trial of temporal lobe epilepsy surgery: Quality-of-life analysis [abstract]. Epilepsia. 2001;42:(suppl):216.Google Scholar
26.Sperling, MR, O'Connor, MJ, Saykin, AJ, Plummer, C. Temporal lobectomy for refractory epilepsy. JAMA. 1996;276:470–475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Vickrey, BG, Hays, RD, Rausch, R, et al.Outcomes in 248 patients who had diagnostic evaluations for epilepsy surgery. Lancet. 1995;346:1445–1449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Cuervo, LG, Clarke, M. Balancing benefits and harms in health care. BMJ. 2003;327:65–66CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Engel, J Jr.The timing of surgical intervention for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: a plan for a randomized clinical trial. Arch Neurol. 1999;56:1338–1341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.Kwan, P, Brodie, MJ. Early identification of refractory epilepsy. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:314–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.McLachlan, RS. Commentary on epilepsy surgery in Canada. Can J Neurol Sci. 2001;28:4–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32.Lhatoo, SD, Solomon, JK, McEvoy, AW, Kitchen, ND, Shorvon, SD, Sander, JW. A prospective study of the requirement for and the provision of epilepsy surgery in the United Kingdom. Epilepsia. 2003;44:673–676.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33.Wieser, HG, Silfvenius, H. Overview: epilepsy surgery in developing countries. Epilepsia. 2000;41(suppl 4):S3–S9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.Bero, LA, Grilli, R, Grimshaw, JM, Harvey, E, Oxman, AD, Thomson, MA. Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. BMJ. 1998;317:465–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35.Schulz, KF, Chalmers, I, Hayes, RJ, Altman, DG. Empirical evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA. 1995;273:408–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed