Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T09:31:03.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How to Launch a National Internet-Based Panel Study Quickly: Lessons From Studying how Americans are Coping With the Tragedy of September 11, 2001

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2014

Lisa D. Butler ,
David A. Seagraves ,
Juliette C. Desjardins ,
Jay Azarow ,
T. Andrew Hastings ,
Robert W. Garlan ,
Sue DiMiceli ,
Andrew Winzelberg  and
David Spiegel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article reports on the planning, development, and implementation of a large national Internet-based panel study of how Americans are coping with the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. The study was designed to determine predictors and correlates of risk and resilience, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally. In order to acquire timely and meaningful data, we developed/adapted an extensive set of measures, obtained human subjects approval, and posted a research Web site just 17 days after the attacks. This article describes the major hurdles we confronted and the guidelines we recommend regarding these topics, including the methodological trade-offs inherent in Internet-based research, information technology requirements and tribulations, human subjects issues, selection of measures and securing permission for their use, and the challenges of participant recruitment. We also discuss issues that we did not anticipate, including the survey intervention. We focus not on findings, but on the concrete procedural, administrative, technical, and scientific challenges we encountered and the solutions we devised under considerable time and resource pressures.

Type
Original Research
Information
CNS Spectrums , Volume 7 , Issue 8 , August 2002 , pp. 597 - 603
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Couper, MP, Traugott, MW, Lamias, MJ. Web survey design and administration. Public Opinion Quarterly. 2001;65:230–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Cardena, E, Spiegel, D. Dissociative reactions to the San Francisco Bay Area earthquake of 1989. Am J Psychiatry. 1993;150:474–478.Google Scholar
3.Freinkel, A, Koopman, C, Spiegel, D. Dissociative symptoms in media eyewitnesses of an execution. Am J Psychiatry. 1994;151:1335–1339.Google ScholarPubMed
4.Koopman, C, Classen, C, Spiegel, D. Predictors of posttraumatic stress symptoms among survivors of the Oakland/Berkeley, Calif., firestorm. Am J Psychiatry. 1994;151:888–894.Google ScholarPubMed
5.Waelde, LC, Koopman, C, Rierdan, J, et al.Symptoms of acute stress disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder following exposure to disastrous flooding. Journal of Trauma and Dissociation. 2001;2:37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Pew Foundation Web site. Available at: http://www.pewInternet.org. Accessed May 13, 2002.Google Scholar
7.Epstein, JF, Barker, PR, Kroutil, LA. Mode effects in self-reported mental health data. Public Opinion Quarterly. 2001;65:529–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Couper, MP. Web surveys. A review of issues and approaches. Public Opinion Quarterly. 2000;64:464–494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Couper, MP. The promises and perils of web surveys. In: Westlake, A, et al., eds. The Challenge of the Internet. London, England: Association for Survey Computing; 2001:35–56.Google Scholar
10.Best, SJ, Krueger, B, Hummard, C, et al.An assessment of the generalizability of Internet surveys. Social Science Computer Review. 2001;19:131–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Witte, JC, Amoroso, AM, Howard, PEN. Method and representation in Internet-based survey tools—Mobility, community, and cultural identity in Survey 2000. Social Science Computer Review. 2000;18:179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. U.S. Census Bureau. 2000: Demographic Profiles. Available at: http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/2002/demoprofiles.html. Accessed May 13, 2002.Google Scholar
13.Galea, S, Ahern, J, Resnick, H, et al.Psychological sequelae of the September 11 terrorist attacks in New York City. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:982–987.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Schuster, MA, Stein, BD, Jaycox, LH, et al.A national survey of stress reactions after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1507–1512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Horowitz, MJ. Stress Response Syndromes. 2nd ed. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson; 1986.Google ScholarPubMed
16.Spiegel, D. Trauma, dissociation, and memory. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997;821:225–237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Spiegel, D. A 43-year-old woman coping with cancer [see comments.]. JAMA. 1999;282:371–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed