Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T05:37:39.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Influences on the Concept of Fibromyalgia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2014

Harold Merskey
Harold Merskey*
Affiliation:
Dr. Merskey is emeritus professor of psychiatry at, University of Western Ontario in Ontario, Canada
*
71 Logan Ave, London, ON N5Y 2P9; Tel: 519-679-1045; Fax: 519-679-6849; E-mail: harold.merskey@sympatico.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite relevant evidence of physical illness promoting fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS), some authors claim that it is a psychological illness, or due to “psychological amplification.” Good evi-dence for such views is lacking. Selection processes lead to increased rates of psychological illness in general practice and in specialist practice. The phys-ical distress of FMS can increase both anxiety and depression. Questionable research supported by the insurance industry has tended to provide nega-tive and disparaging views of pain. Current imag-ing studies support the view that central effects connected with FMS relate to the processing of noxious stimulation more than affective disorder.

Type
Research Article
Information
CNS Spectrums , Volume 13 , Issue S5 , March 2008 , pp. 18 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Russell, IJ. Fibromyalgia syndrome: approach to management. CNS Spectr. 2008;13(3 Suppl 5):27–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Ehrlich, GE. Pain is real; fibromyalgia isn't. J Rheumatol. 2003;30(8):1666–1667.Google Scholar
3.Winfield, JB. Does pain in fibromyalgia reflect somatization? Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44(4):751–753.Google Scholar
4.Wolfe, F. The fibromyalgia syndrome: A consensus report on fibromyalgia and disability. J Rheumatol. 1996;23(3):534–539.Google Scholar
5.Yunus, MB, Bennett, RM, Romano, TJ, et al.Fibromyalgia consensus Report: Another Viewpoint. Clin J Rheumatol. 1998;3:324–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Merskey, H, Bogduk, N. Classification of Chronic Pain: Descriptions of Chronic Pain Syndromes and Definitions of Pain Terms. 2nd ed. Seattle, Wash: IASP Press; 1994.Google Scholar
7.Staud, R, Spaeth, M. Psychophysical and neurochemical abnormalities of pain processing in fibromyalgia. CNS Spectr. 2008;13(3 Suppl 5):12–17.Google Scholar
8.Fassbender, K, Samborsky, W, Kellner, M, Müller, W, Lautenbacher, S. Tender points, depressive and functional symptoms: comparison between fibromyalgia and major depression. Clin Rheumatol. 1997;16(1):76–79.Google Scholar
9.Goldenberg, DL. Psychological symptoms and psychiatric diagnosis in patients with fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol Suppl. 1989;19:127–130.Google ScholarPubMed
10.Merskey, H. Physical and psychological considerations in the classification of fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol Suppl. 1989;19:72–79.Google Scholar
11.Shepherd, M, Cooper, B, Brown, AC, Kalton, GW. Psychiatric Illness in General Practice. London, England: Oxford University Press; 1966.Google Scholar
12.Raphael, KG, Chandler, HK, Ciccone, DS. Is childhood abuse a risk factor for chronic pain in adulthood? Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2004;8(2):99–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Raphael, KG, Natelson, BH, Janal, MN, Nayak, S. A community-based survey of fibro-myalgia-like pain complaints following the World Trade Center terrorist attacks. Pain. 2002;100(1-2):131–139.Google Scholar
14.Banks, MH, Beresford, SA, Morrell, DC, Waller, JJ, Watkins, CJ. Factors influencing demand for primary medical care in women aged 20-40 years: a preliminary report. Int J Epidemiol. 1975;4(3):189–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Pond, DA, Bidwell, BH. A survey of epilepsy in fourteen general practices. II. Social and psychological aspects. Epilepsia. 1960;1:285–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Crook, J, Tunks, E. Defining the “chronic pain syndrome”: An epidemiological method. In: Advances in Pain Research and Therapy. Fields, H, Dubner, R, Cervero, F, ed. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1985:871–877.Google Scholar
17.Bradley, JJ. Severe localized pain associated with the depressive syndrome. Br J Psychiatry. 1963;109:741–745.Google Scholar
18.Schmidt-Wilcke, T, Luerding, R, et al.Striatal grey matter increase in patients suffering from fibromyalgia--a voxel-based morphometry study. Pain. 2007 Nov;132(Suppl 1):109–116.Google Scholar
19.Gracely, RH, Petzke, F, Wolf, JM, Clauw, DJ. Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence of augmented pain processing in fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46(5):1333–1343.Google Scholar
20.Spitzer, WO, Skovron, ML, Salmi, LR, et al.Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-Associated Disorders: redefining “whiplash” and its management. Spine. 1995;20(8 Suppl):1–73. [Erratum in: Spine 1995; 20(21): 2372].Google Scholar
21.Teasell, RW, Merskey, H. The Quebec Task Force on whiplash-associated disorders and the British Columbia Whiplash Initiative: a study of insurance industry initiatives. Pain Res Manag. 1999;4(3):141–149.Google Scholar
22.Lord, SM, Barnsley, L, Wallis, BJ, McDonald, GJ, Bogduk, N. Percutaneous radio-fre-quency neurotomy for chronic cervical zygapophyseal-joint pain. N Eng J Med. 1996; 335(23):1721–1726.Google Scholar
23.Radanov, BP, Sturzenegger, M, De Stefano, G, Schnidrig, A. Relationship between early somatic, radiological, cognitive and psychosocial findings and outcome during a one-year follow-up in 117 patients suffering from common whiplash. Br J Rheumatol. 1994;33(5):442–448.Google Scholar
24.Cassidy, JD, Carroll, LJ, Côté, P, Lemstra, M, Berglund, A, Nygren, A. Effect of eliminating compensation for pain and suffering on the outcome of insurance claims for whiplash injury. N Eng J Med. 2000;342(16):1179–1186.Google Scholar
25.Kivol, K. Re: Saskatchewan government insurance study. Pain Res Manag. 2000;5(3):129–130.Google Scholar