Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T12:45:21.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is there enough “interest in and pleasure in” the concept of depression? The development of the Leuven Affect and Pleasure Scale (LAPS)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2017

Koen Demyttenaere ,
Philippe Mortier ,
Glenn Kiekens  and
Ronny Bruffaerts
Koen Demyttenaere*
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosciences, Research Group Psychiatry, University of Leuven; University Psychiatric Center KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Philippe Mortier
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosciences, Research Group Psychiatry, University of Leuven; University Psychiatric Center KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Glenn Kiekens
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosciences, Research Group Psychiatry, University of Leuven; University Psychiatric Center KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Ronny Bruffaerts
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosciences, Research Group Psychiatry, University of Leuven; University Psychiatric Center KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
*
*Address for correspondence: K. Demyttenaere, University Psychiatric Center KU Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium (Email: koen.demyttenaere@uzleuven.be)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

Presence of negative mood (depressed mood) and anhedonia (lack of interest and pleasure) are considered core symptoms of depression, while absence of positive mood is not taken into account. It is therefore remarkable that the depression scales routinely used to assess changes during antidepressant treatment (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HDRS], Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS]) do not really take into account anhedonia. Several scales were developed to assess positive mood and hedonic tone, but they only partially cover the multidimensional concept. Therefore we developed a new 16-item questionnaire, the Leuven Affect and Pleasure Scale (LAPS), to assess negative affect, positive affect, and hedonic tone.

Methods

This first article on the LAPS questionnaire reports on the correlations between the different items, on the factor analysis, and on the differences found in 3 groups of subjects : healthy college students (N=138), depressed but still functioning college students (N=27), and severely depressed inpatients (N=38). These differences were calculated using univariate general linear models with Bonferroni post-hoc testing, and effect sizes were expressed in η2.

Results

Negative and positive affect were only moderately correlated, and the 4 independent variables (cognitive functioning, overall functioning, meaningful life, and happiness) had stronger correlations with positive affect than with negative affect. The major difference in negative affect was between healthy college students and depressed college students, positive affect was different between the 3 groups, and the major difference for hedonic tone was between depressed college students and depressed inpatients. Affiliative positive affect and the affiliative hedonic function were well preserved, even in depressed inpatients.

Conclusions

This preliminary report suggests that the LAPS offers a comprehensive assessment of negative and positive affect, of hedonic tone, and of independent variables (cognitive functioning, overall functioning, meaningful life, and happiness). Clinically relevant differences in subscores were found in 3 groups of subjects with variable levels of depression (healthy subjects, mildly depressed subjects, and severely depressed inpatients).

Keywords

Anhedoniadepressioninterestnegative affectpleasurepositive affect
Type
Original Research
Information
CNS Spectrums , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , April 2019 , pp. 265 - 274
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.Google Scholar
Sibitz, I, Berger, P, Freidl, M, et al. ICD-10 or DSM-IV? Anhedonia, fatigue and depressed mood as screening symptoms for diagnosing a current depressive episode in physically ill patients in general hospital. J Affect Disord. 2010; 126(1–2): 245–251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmerman, M, McGlinchey, JB, Young, D, Chelminski, I. Diagnosing major depressive disorder: a psychometric evaluation of the DSM-IV symptom criteria. J Nerv Ment Disord. 2010; 194(3): 158–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, DF. Endogenomorphic depression: a conceptual and terminological revision. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1974; 31(4): 447–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapman, LJ, Chapman, JP, Raulin, ML. Scales for physical and social anhedonia. J Abnorm Psychol. 1976; 85(4): 374–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Treadway, MT, Zald, DH. Reconsidering anhedonia in depression: lessons from translational neuroscience. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010; 35(3): 537–555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, D, Tellegen, A. Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychol Bull. 1985; 98(2): 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, JA, Carroll, JM. On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychol Bull. 1999; 125(1): 3–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tong, EMW. Differentiation of 13 positive emotions by appraisals. Cogn Emot. 2015; 29(3): 484–503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Posner, J, Russell, JA, Peterson, BS. The circumplex model of affect: an integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology. Dev Psychopathol. 2005; 17(3): 715–734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Depue, RA, Morrone-Strupinsky, JV. A neurobehavioral model of affiliative bonding. Behav Brain Sci. 2005; 28(3): 313–395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960; 23(1): 56–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, SA, Åsberg, M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry. 1979; 134(4): 382–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, D, Clark, LA, Tellegen, A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988; 54(6): 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snaith, RP, Hamilton, M, Morley, S, Humayan, A, Gargreaves, D, Trigwell, P. A scale for the assessment of hedonic tone: the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1995; 167(1): 99–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gard, DE, Germans Gard, M, Kring, AM, John, OP. Anticipatory and consummatory components of the experience of pleasure: a scale development study. Journal of Research in Personality. 2006; 40(6): 1086–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demyttenaere, K, Donneau, AF, Albert, A, Ansseau, M, Constant, E, van Heeringen, K. What is important in being cured from depression? Discordance between physicians and patients (1). J Affect Disord. 2015; 174: 390–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, RC, Ustun, TB. The World Mental Health (WMH) survey initiative version of the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2004; 13(2): 93–121.Google Scholar
Zigmond, AS, Snaith, RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983; 67(6): 361–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chida, Y, Steptoe, A. Positive psychological well-being and mortality: a quantitative review of prospective observational studies. Psychosom Med. 2008; 70(6): 741–756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geschwind, N, Nicolson, NA, Peeters, F, van Os, J, Barge-Schaapveld, D, Wichers, M. Early improvement in positive rather than in negative emotion predicts remission from depression after pharmacotherapy. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011; 21(3): 241–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gorwood, P, Demyttenaere, K, Vaiva, G, et al. An increase in joy after two weeks is more specific of later antidepressant response than a decrease in sadness. J Affect Disord. 2015; 185: 97–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uher, R, Perlis, RH, Henigsberg, N, et al. Depression symptom dimensions as predictors of antidepressant treatment outcome: replicable evidence for interest-activity symptoms. Psychol Med. 2012; 42(5): 967–980.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dreisbach, G, Goschke, T. How positive affect modulates cognitive control: reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractibility. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004; 30(2): 343–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Orden, K, Witte, TK, Cukrowicz, KC, Braithwaite, S, Selby, EA, Joiner, TE. The interpersonal theory of suicide. Psychol Rev. 2010; 117(2): 575–600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed