Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T04:58:48.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Jail diversion: a practical primer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2020

Charles L. Scott Open the ORCID record for Charles L. Scott [Opens in a new window]
Charles L. Scott*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, USA
*
*Address correspondence to: Charles L. Scott, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, UCDMC, 2230 Stockton Boulevard, Sacramento, California 95817, USA. (Email: clsott@ucdavis.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The United States has the highest incarceration rate in the world. With a substantial number of inmates diagnosed with mental illness, substance use, or both, various diversion strategies have been developed to help decrease and avoid criminalization of individuals with mental illness. This article focuses primarily on the first three Sequential Intercept Model intercept points as related to jail diversion and reviews types of diversion programs, research outcomes for diversion programs, and important components that contribute to successful diversion.

Keywords

Diversiondrug courtsjailmental health courtspolice.
Type
Review
Information
CNS Spectrums , Volume 25 , Issue 5 , October 2020 , pp. 651 - 658
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

Walmsley, R. World prison population list. World Prison Brief. 12th ed. Institute for Criminal Policy Research; 2018. London, UK. www.prisonstudies.org. Accessed August 10, 2019.Google Scholar
Hoge, SK, Buchanan, AW, Kovasznay, MB, Roskes, EJ. Outpatient services for the mentally ill involved in the criminal justice system. American Psychiatric Association Task Force Report: Washington, DC; 2009: 1–15.Google Scholar
Bronson, J, Stroop, J. Drug Use, Dependence, and Abuse Among State Prisoners and Jail Inmates, 2007-2009. NCJ 250546. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2017.Google Scholar
Pinals, DA. Forensic services, public mental health policy, and financing: charting the course ahead. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2014:42(1):7–19.Google ScholarPubMed
Dewa, CS, Loong, D, Grujillo, A, Bonato, S. Evidence for the effectiveness of police-based pre-booking diversion programs in decriminalizing mental illness: a systematic literature review. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(6):e0199368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winick, B, Wexler, DB. Judging in a Therapeutic Key: Therapeutic Jurisprudence and the Court. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press; 2003 Google Scholar
Munetz, MR, Griffin, PA. Use of the sequential intercept model as an approach to decriminalization of people with serious mental illness. Psychiatr Serv. 2006;57(4):544–549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Livingston, JD. Contact between police and people with mental disorders: a review of rates. Psychiatr Serv. 2016;67 (8):850–857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, WH, Roy-Bujnowski, KM, Grudzinskas, A, Clayfield, JC, Banks, SM, Wolff, N. Patterns and prevalence of arrest in a statewide cohort of mental health care consumers. Psychiatr Serv. 2006;56(11):1623–1628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, DA, Kamb, HR, Biasotti, M, Snook, J. Overlooked in the undercounted. The role of mental illness in fatal law enforcement encounters. Treatment Advocacy Center. https://www.treatmentadvocacycenter.org/evidence-and-research/studies. Accessed August 23, 2019.Google Scholar
Reuland, M, Schwarzfeld, M, Draper, L. Law Enforcement Responses to People with Mental Illnesses: A Guide to Research-Informed Policy and Practice. New York, NY: Council of State Governments Justice Center; 2012.Google Scholar
Wood, JD, Watson, AC. Improving police interventions during mental health-related encounters: past, present and future. Policing Soc. 2017;27:289–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dupont, R, Cochran, MJ, Pillsbury, S. Crisis intervention team core elements. The University of Memphis, School of Urban Affairs and Public Policy, Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, CIT Center, 1-20; 2007.Google Scholar
Crisis Intervention Training: National Curriculum. University of Memphis, CIT Center. http://cit.memphis.edu/curriculuma.php?id-0. Accessed August 19, 2019.Google Scholar
Cuddeback, GS, Kurtz, RA, Wilson, AB, VanDeinse, T, Burgin, SE. Segmented versus traditional Crisis Intervention Team training. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2016;44(3):338-43.Google ScholarPubMed
Watson, AC, Ottati, VC, Morabito, M, Draine, J, Kerr, AN, Angel, B. Outcomes of police contacts with persons with mental illness: the impact of CIT. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2010:37:302–317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Compton, MT, Bahor, M, Watson, AC, Oliva, JR. A comprehensive review of extant research on Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) programs. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2008:36(1):47–55.Google ScholarPubMed
Compton, MT, Bakeman, R, Broussard, B, D’Orio, B, Watson, AC. Police officers’ volunteering for (rather than being assigned to) Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) training: evidence for a beneficial self-selection effect. Behav Sci Law. 2017:35(6-6):470–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strassle, CG. CIT in small municipalities: officer level outcomes. Behav Sci Law. 2019:37(4):342–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, AC, Ottati, VC, Morabito, M, Draine, J, Kerr, AN, Angel, B. Outcomes of police contacts with persons with mental illness: the impact of CIT . Adm Policy Ment Health. 2010:37:302–317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steadman, HJ, Morrissette, D. Police responses to persons with mental illness: going beyond CIT training. Psych Serv. 2016:67(10):1054–1056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Compton, MT, Halpern, B, Broussard, B, et al. A potential new form of jail diversion and reconnection to mental health services: 1. Stakeholders’ views on acceptability. Behav Sci Law . 2017:35:480–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puntis, S, Perfect, D, Kirubarajan, A, et al. A systematic review of co-responder models of police mental health ‘street’ triage. BMC Psychiatry. 2018:18(1):1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meehan, T, Brack, J, Mansfield, Y, Stedman, T. Do police-mental health co-responder programmes reduce emergency department presentations or simply delay the inevitable? Australas Psychiatry. 2019:27(1):18–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, RL. Evaluation of a mobile crisis program: effectiveness, efficiency, and consumer satisfaction. Psychiatr Serv. 2000:51(9):1153–1156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steadman, HJ, Stainbrook, KA, Griffin, P, Draine, J, Dupont, R, Horey, C. A specialized crisis response site as a core element of police-based diversion programs. Psychiatr Serv. 2001:52(2):219–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sirotich, F. The criminal justice outcomes of jail diversion programs for persons with mental illness; a review of the evidence. J Am Acad Psych Law. 2009;37(4):461–472.Google Scholar
Shafer, MS, Arthur, B, Franczak, MJ. An analysis of post-booking jail diversion programming for persons with co-occurring disorders. Behav Sci Law. 2004;22:771–85.Google ScholarPubMed
Gill, KJ, Murphy, AA. Jail diversion for persons with serious mental illness coordinated by a prosecutor’s office. BioMed Research Int. 2017;2017:7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salzberg, PM, Klingberg, CL. The effectiveness of deferred prosecution for driving while intoxicated. J Stud Alcohol. 1983:44(2):299–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Washington State Institute for Public Policy. Deferred prosecution of DUI cases in Washington State: evaluating the impact on recidivism, August 2008. www.wsipp.wa.gov. Accessed August 21, 2019.Google Scholar
Fulkerson, A, Keena, LD, O’Brien, E. Understanding success and nonsuccess in the drug court. Int J Offender Therapy Compar Criminol. 2012;57(10):1297–1316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrell, A, Roman, J. Reducing drug use and crime among offenders: the impact of graduated sanctions. J Drug Issues. 2001;31:207–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindquist, CH, Krebs, C, Lattimore, PK. Sanctions and rewards in drug court programs: implementation, perceived efficacy, and decision making. J Drug Issues. 2006;36:119–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulkerson, A. Drug treatment versus probation: an examination of comparative recidivism rates. Southwest J Crim Justice . 2012;8:30–45.Google Scholar
Goldkamp, JD, Irons-Guynn, C. Emerging Judicial Strategies for the Mentally Ill in the Criminal Caseload: Mental Health Courts in Fort Laurderdale, Seattle, San Bernardino, and Anchorage. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Assistance Monograph; 2000. Pub no. NCJ 182504.Google Scholar
McNeil, DE, Binder, RL. Effectiveness of a mental health court in reducing criminal recidivism and violence. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164:1895–1403.Google Scholar
Lowder, EM, Rade, CB, Desmarais, SL. Effectiveness of mental health courts in reducing recidivism: a meta-analysis. Psychiatr Serv. 2018;69(1):15–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redlich, AD, Steadman, HJ, Monahan, K, Petrila, J, Griffin, PA. The second generation of mental health courts. Psychol Public Policy Law. 2005;11(4):527–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, Y, Capriotti, MR. The impact of mental health court: a Sacramento case study. Behav Sci Law. 2019;37:452–467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinals, DA, Gaba, A, Clary, KM, Barber, J, Reiss, J, Smelson, D. Implementation of MISSION-Criminal Justice in a treatment court: preliminary outcomes among individuals with co-occurring disorders. Psychiatr Serv. 2019;70(11):1044–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazelon, D. Forward. In Insanity Inside Out. Donaldson K. Crown, University of Michigan; 1976: xi.Google Scholar