Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:13:12.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why is terrorism a man’s business?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2017

Anne Maria Möller-Leimkühler
Anne Maria Möller-Leimkühler*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
*
*Address for correspondence: Prof. Dr.rer.soc Anne Maria Möller-Leimkühler, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Nussbaumstr. 7, D-80336 Munich, Germany. (Email: anne-maria.moeller-leimkuehler@med.uni-muenchen.de)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Terrorism, whether it is group-related or performed as lone actor terrorism, is a predominantly male phenomenon. Generally and throughout history, young males have been the main protagonists of criminal and political violence.

This article aims to contribute, from different perspecives, to the question of what makes young men violent. These include neurobiological aspects, such as sex differences in the brain that predispose males to physical aggression and violence; gender role aspects, with regard to aggression and violence being basic components for demonstrating and reconstructing masculinity; demographic aspects of male youth bulges as potential breeding grounds for terrorism; aspects of group dynamics and identity fusion in the process of radicalization; and psychosocial characteristics of lone actor terrorists, which differ from group-related terrorists.

It is concluded that in addition to ideological, political, economic, regional, demographic, or psychosocial causes, experiences of threatened masculinity may be an underlying factor and driving force for terrorism.

Keywords

Groupidentity fusionmasculinitymenterrorismyouth bulge
Type
Review Articles
Information
CNS Spectrums , Volume 23 , Special Issue 2: Evil, psychiatry, and terrorism: understanding the roots of evil , April 2018 , pp. 119 - 128
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Schmidt, AP. The revised academic consensus definition of terrorism. Perspectives on Terrorism. 2012; 6(2): 158–159.Google Scholar
2. Post, JM. Terrorism and right-wing extremism: the changing face of terrorism and political violence in the 21st century: the virtual community of hatred. Int J Group Psychother. 2015; 65(2): 243–271.Google Scholar
3. Institute for Economics & Peace. Global terrorism index 2016. http://economicsandpeace.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Global-Terrorism-Index-2016.2.pdf?bcsi_scan_64377d2312a1e457=0&bcsi_scan_filename=Global-Terrorism-Index-2016.2.pdf.Google Scholar
4. White, JR. Terrorism and Homeland Security, 7th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning; 2012.Google Scholar
5. Bergen, P, Cruickshank, P. The Iraq effect: war has increased terrorism sevenfold worldwide. Mother Jones. 2007: 1–7. http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2007/03/iraq-effect-war-iraq-and-its-impact-war-terrorism-pg-2.Google Scholar
6. Pew Research Center. Unfavorable views of Jews and Muslims on the increase in Europe. http://www.pewglobal.org/2008/09/17/unfavorable-views-of-jews-and-muslims-on-the-increase-in-europe/. September 17, 2008.Google Scholar
7. Bremmer, I. These 5 facts explain why Europe is ground zero for terrorism. Time. http://time.com/4268579/brussels-attacks-islamist-terrorism-isis/. March 22, 2016.Google Scholar
8. Renard, T. Fear not: a critical perspective on the terrorist threat in Europe. Security Policy Brief No. 77; 2016. Egmont Royal Institute for International Relations, Brussels.Google Scholar
9. Niehoff, D. Not hardwired: the complex neurobiology of sex differences in violence. Violence and Gender. 2014; 1(1): 19–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Staniloiu, A, Markowitsch, H. Gender differences in violence and aggression—a neurobiological perspective. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012; 33: 1032–1036.Google Scholar
11. Caspi, A, McClay, J, Miffitt, TE, et al. Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science. 2002; 297(5582): 851–854.Google Scholar
12. Bogerts, B, Möller-Leimkühler, AM. Neurobiologische Ursachen und psychosoziale Bedingungen individueller Gewalt. Nervenarzt. 2013; 84(11): 1329–1344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Montoya, ER, Terburg, D, Bos, PA, van Honk, J. Testosterone, cortisol, and serotonin as key regulators of social aggression: a review and theoretical perspective. Motiv Emot. 2012; 36(1): 65–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Walderhaug, E, Magnusson, A, Neumeister, A, et al. Interactive effects of sex and 5-HTTLPR on mood and impulsivity during tryptophan depletion in healthy people. Biol Psychiatry. 2007; 62(6): 593–599.Google Scholar
15. Lighthall, NR, Mather, M, Gorlick, MA. Acute stress increases sex differences in risk seeking in the balloon analogue risk task. PLoS One. 2009; 4(7): e6002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Taylor, SE, Klein, LC, Lewis, BP, Gruenewald, TL, Gurung, RA, Updegraff, JA. Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychol Rev. 107(3): 411–429.Google Scholar
17. Stanton, SJ, Wirth, MM, Waugh, CE, Schultheiss, OC. Endogenous testosterone levels are associated with amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex responses to anger faces in men but not women. Biol Psychiatry. 2009; 81(2): 118–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Steinberg, L. A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Dev Rev. 2008; 28(1): 78–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Eaton, DK, Kann, L, Kinchen, S, et al. Youth risk behaviour surveillance – United States, 2011. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2012; 61(4): 1–162.Google Scholar
20. Telzer, EH. Dopaminergic reward sensitivity can promote adolescent health: a new perspective on the mechanism of ventral striatum activation. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2016; 17: 57–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Goudie, C, Markoff, B. How ISIS recruiting videos mirror Hollywood scripts. http://abc7chicago.com/news/how-isis-recruiting-videos-mirror-hollywood-scripts/1194173/. February 9, 2016.Google Scholar
22. Riegler, T. Through the lenses of Hollywood: depictions of terrorism in American movies. Perspectives on Terrorism. 2010; 4(2): 35–45.Google Scholar
23. Hall, A. ISIS has launched a new recruitment drive among unaccompanied youngsters in Germany’s refugee camps. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3799915/ISIS-launched-new-recruitment-drive-unaccompanied-youngsters-Germany-s-refugee-camps-officials-warn-group-plots-Paris-style-carnage. September 21, 2016.Google Scholar
24. Connell, RW, Messerschmidt, JW. Hegemonic masculinity: rethinking the concept. Gender and Society. 2005; 19(6): 829–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Holt, DB, Thompson, CJ. Man-of-action heroes: the pursuit of heroic masculinity in everyday consumption. Journal of Consumer Research. 2004; 31(2): 425–440.Google Scholar
26. Ferber, AL, Kimmel, MS. The gendered face of terrorism. Sociology Compass. 2008; 2(3): 870–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Bosson, JK, Vandello, JA. Precarious manhood and its links to action and aggression. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2011; 20(2): 82–86.Google Scholar
28. The Swedish Agency for Youth and Civil Society. Young and extreme—a youth and gender perspective on violent extremism. https://www.mucf.se/sites/default/files/publikationer_uploads/young-and-extreme.pdf. 2016.Google Scholar
29. Werner, F. Soldatische Männlichkeit im Vernichtungskrieg. Geschlechtsspezifische Dimensionen der Gewalt in Feldpostbriefen 1941–1944. In Didczuneit V, Ebert J, Jander T, eds. Schreiben im Krieg – Schreiben vom Krieg. Feldpost im Zeitalter der Weltkriege. Essen, Germany: Klartext; 2011: 283–294.Google Scholar
30. Neizel, S, Welzer, H. Soldaten: On Fighting, Killing and Dying: The Secret Second World War Tapes of German POWs. New York: Simon & Schuster/Paula Wiseman Books; 2012.Google Scholar
31. Morgan, DHJ. Theater of war: combat, the military, and masculinities. In: Brod H, Kaufman M, eds. Theorizing Masculinities. London: Sage; 1994: 165.Google Scholar
32. Eichler, M. Militarized masculinities in international relations. Brown Journal of World Affairs. 2014; 21(1): 81–93.Google Scholar
33. McCue, C, Haahr, K. The impact of youth bulges on Islamist radicalization and violence. https://www.ctc.usma.edu/posts/the-impact-of-global-youth-bulges-on-islamist-radicalization-and-violence. 2008.Google Scholar
34. Cohen, D, Nusbett, RE, Bowdle, BF, Schwarz, N. Insult, aggression, and the southern culture of honor: an “experimental ethnography. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996; 70(5): 945–959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35. Richards, B. What drove Anders Breivik. Contexts. 2014; 13(4): 42–47.Google Scholar
36. Junge, Männer. Die gefährlichste Spezies der Welt. http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-55294591.html. Der Spiegel. 2008;2.Google Scholar
37. Loeber, R, Hoeve, M, Slot, NW, van der Laan, PH. Persisters and desisters in crime from adolescence into adulthood. London: Routledge; 2012.Google Scholar
38. Newman, E. Exploring the “root causes” of terrorism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism. 2006; 29(8): 749–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39. Kivimäki, T, Montesanti, E. Global terrorism: causes, consequences and solutions. Global Research. http://www.globalresearch.ca/global-terrorism-causes-consequences-and-solutions/5529247. 2016.Google Scholar
40. Urdal, H. A clash of generations? Youth bulges and political violence. International Studies Quarterly. 2006; 50(3): 607–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41. Aslam, M. Gender-Based Explosions: The Nexus Between Muslim Masculinities, Jihadist Islamism and Terrorism. Tokyo: United Nations University Press; 2012.Google Scholar
42. Gambetta, D, Hertog, S. Engineers of Jihad: The Curious Connection Between Violent Extremism and Education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43. Kivimäki, T. Executive summary. In Kivimäki T, ed. Development Cooperation as an Instrument in the Prevention of Terrorism. Copenhagen: The Royal Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs/Nordic Institute of Asia Studies; 2003.Google Scholar
44. Kroehnert, S, Klingholz, R. Not am Mann. Von Helden der Arbeit zur neuen Unterschicht? Berlin Institut für Bevölkerung und Entwicklung. http://www.berlin-institut.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Studien/Not_am_Mann_Webversion.pdf. 2007.Google Scholar
45. Kroehnert, S, Vollmer, S. Where have all young women gone? Gender-specific migration from East to West Germany. World Development Report. Background Paper. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWDR2009/Resources/4231006-1204741572978/Vollmer.pdf. 2008.Google Scholar
46. Koehler, D. Right-wing extremism and terrorism in Europe. PRISM.. 2016; 6(2): 85–104.Google Scholar
47. Sageman, M. Understanding terror networks. Foreign Policy Research Institute. httpp://www.fpri.org/enotes/20041101.middleeast.sageman.understandingterrornetwarks.html. 2004.Google Scholar
48. McGilloway, A, Ghosh, P, Bhui, K. A systematic review of pathways to and processes associated with radicalization and extremism amongst Muslims in Western societies. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2015; 27(1):39–50.Google Scholar
49. Möller-Leimkühler, AM, Bogerts, B. Kollektive Gewalt. Neurobiologische, psychosoziale und gesellschaftliche Bedingungen. Nervenarzt. 2013; 84(11): 1345–1358.Google Scholar
50. Tajfel, H, Turner, J. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Hogg MA, Abrams D, eds. Intergroup Relations. New York: Psychology Press; 2001: 94–109.Google Scholar
51. Tajfel, H. Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American. 1970; 223: 96–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52. Swann, WB, Jetten, J, Gómez, A, Whitehouse, H. When group membership gets personal: a theory of identity fusion. Psychol. Rev. 2012; 119(3): 441–456.Google Scholar
53. Swann, WB, Buhrmester, MD. Identity fusion. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2015; 24(1): 52–57.Google Scholar
54. Atran, S, Henrich, J. The evolution of religion: how cognitive by-products, adaptive learning heuristics, ritual displays, and group competition generate deep commitments to prosocial religions. Biological Theory. 2010; 5(1): 18–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55. Atran, S. The devoted actor: unconditional commitment and intractable conflict across cultures. Current Anthropology. 2016; 57(13): S192–S203.Google Scholar
56. Abrahms, M. What terrorists really want. International Security. 2008; 32(4): 78–105.Google Scholar
57. Marneros, A. Hitlers Urenkel. Rechtsradikale Gewalttäter. Bern, Switzerland: Scherz; 2002.Google Scholar
58. Simi, P, Windisch, S, Sporer, K. Recruitment and Radicalization Among US Far Right Terrorists. College Park, MD: START; 2016.Google Scholar
59. Sitzer, P, Heitmeyer, W. Right-wing extremist violence among adolescents in Germany. New Dir Youth Dev. 2008; 2008(119): 169–185.Google Scholar
60. Pantucci, R, Ellis, C, Chaplais, L. Lone-Actor Terrorism: Literature Review. The Royal United Services Institute for Defense and Security Studies. London, UK: Stephen Austin and Sons; 2015.Google Scholar
61. Weimann, G. Lone wolves in cyberspace. Journal of Terrorism Research. 2012; 3(2): 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
62. Gill, P, Horgan, J, Deckert, P. Bombing alone: tracing the motivations and antecedent behaviors of lone-actor terrorists. J Forensic Sci. 2014; 59(2): 425–435.Google Scholar
63. McCauley, C, Moskalenko, S, Van Son, B. Characteristics of lone-wolf violent offenders: a comparison of assassins and school attackers. Perspectives on Terrorism. 2013; 7(1): 4–24.Google Scholar
64. Hamm, M, Spaaj, R. Lone wolf terrorism in America: using knowledge of radicalization pathways to forge prevention strategies. Final Report. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/248691. 2015.Google Scholar
65. Gill, P. Lone-Actor Terrorists: A Behavioural Analysis. London: Routledge; 2015.Google Scholar
66. Borum, R. Informing lone-offender investigations. Criminology & Public Policy. 2013; 12(1): 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
67. Corner, E, Gill, P. A false dichotomy? Mental illness and lone-actor terrorism. Law Hum Behav. 2015; 39(1): 23–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
68. Gruenewald, J, Chermak, S, Freilich, JD. Distinguishing “loner” attacks from other domestic extremist violence. Criminology & Public Policy. 2013; 12(1): 65–91.Google Scholar
69. Langman, P. Amok im Kopf. Warum Schüler töten. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz; 2009.Google Scholar
70. Böckler, N, Hoffmann, J, Zick, A. The Frankfurt Airport attack: a case study on the radicalization of a lone-actor terrorist. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management. 2015; 2(3–4): 153–163.Google Scholar
71. Theweleit, K. Das Lachen der Täter. Breivik u.a. St. Pölten – Salzburg-Wien: Residenz Verlag; 2. Auflage; 2015.Google Scholar
72. Can Europe’s populists be blamed for Anders Breivik’s crusade? http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/the-trail-of-evil-can-europe-s-populists-be-blamed-for-anders-breivik-s-crusade-a-777710.html. August 1, 2011.Google Scholar
73. Forsythe, P. Profiling ideology the best way to combat terrorism. http://thebattleoftours.blogspot.de/2016/04/profiling-ideology-best-way-to-combat.html. April 11, 2016.Google Scholar
74. Goldhagen DJ. The humiliation myth. Democracy Journal. http://democracyjournal.org/magazine/4/the-humiliation-myth/. 2007.Google Scholar