Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:53:30.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Additive and Multiplicative Structure in Matrix Spaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2007

MEI-CHU CHANG*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA (e-mail: mcc@math.ucr.edu)

Abstract

Let A be a set of N matrices. Let g(A) ≔ |A + A| + |A · A|, where A + A = {a1 + a2aiA} and A · A = {a1a2aiA} are the sum set and product set. We prove that if the determinant of the difference of any two distinct matrices in A is nonzero, then g(A) cannot be bounded below by cN for any constant c. We also prove that if A is a set of d × d symmetric matrices, then there exists ϵ = ϵ(d)>0 such that g(A)>N1+ϵ. For the first result, we use the bound on the number of factorizations in a generalized progression. For the symmetric case, we use a technical proposition which provides an affine space V containing a large subset E of A, with the property that if an algebraic property holds for a large subset of E, then it holds for V. Then we show that the system a2 : aV is commutative, allowing us to decompose as eigenspaces simultaneously, so we can finish the proof with induction and a variant of the Erdős–Szemerédi argument.

Type
Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Bilu, Y. (1999) Structure of sets with small sumset. Structure Theory of Set Addition: Astérisque 258 pp. 77108.Google Scholar
[2]Bourgain, J. and Chang, M.-C. (2004) On the size of k-fold sum and product sets of integers. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 17 pp. 473497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Bourgain, J., Katz, N. and Tao, T. (2004) A sum-product estimate in finite fields, and applications. GAFA 14 pp. 2757.Google Scholar
[4]Chang, M.-C. (2002) Factorization in generalized arithmetic progressions and applications to the Erdős–Szemerédi sum-product problems. GAFA 113 pp. 399419.Google Scholar
[5]Chang, M.-C. (2003) Erdős–Szemerédi problem on sum set and product set. Annals of Math. 157 939957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Chang, M.-C. (2004) On sums and products of distinct numbers. J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 105 349354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Chang, M.-C. (2004) A sum-product theorem in semi-simple commutative Banach algebras. J. Funct. Anal. 212 399430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Chang, M.-C. (2005) A sum-product estimate in algebraic division algebras over R. Israel J. Math. 150 pp. 369380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Elekes, G. (1997) On the number of sums and products. Acta Arithmetica 81 365367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Elekes, G. and Ruzsa, I. Z. (2003) Product sets are very large if sumsets are very small. Studia Sci. Math. Hungar. 40.Google Scholar
[11]Erdős, P. and Szemerédi, E. (1983) On sums and products of integers. In Studies in Pure Mathematics, Birkhäuser, Basel, pp. 213218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Ford, K. (1998) Sums and products from a finite set of real numbers. Ramanujan J. 2 5966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Nathanson,, M. B. (1993) The simplest inverse problems in additive number theory. In Number Theory with an Emphasis on the Markoff Spectrum (Pollington, A. and Moran, W., eds), Marcel Dekker, pp. 191206.Google Scholar
[14]Nathanson, M. B. (1996) Additive Number Theory: Inverse Problems and the Geometry of Sumsets, Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Nathanson, M. B. (1997) On sums and products of integers. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 125 916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Nathanson, M. and Tenenbaum, G. (1999) Inverse theorems and the number of sums and products. Structure Theory of Set Addition: Astérisque 258 195204.Google Scholar
[17]Ruzsa, I. Z. (1994) Generalized arithmetic progressions and sumsets. Acta Math. Hungar. 65 379388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Solymosi, J. (2005) On the number of sums and products. Bulletin London Math. Soc. (4) 37 pp. 491494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar