Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:41:12.152Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Number of Perfect Matchings in Random Lifts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2010

CATHERINE GREENHILL
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia2052 (e-mail: csg@unsw.edu.au)
SVANTE JANSON
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Uppsala University, PO Box 480, S-751 06 Uppsala, Sweden (e-mail: svante.janson@math.uu.se)
ANDRZEJ RUCIŃSKI
Affiliation:
Department of Discrete Mathematics, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland61-614 (e-mail: rucinski@amu.edu.pl)

Abstract

Let G be a fixed connected multigraph with no loops. A random n-lift of G is obtained by replacing each vertex of G by a set of n vertices (where these sets are pairwise disjoint) and replacing each edge by a randomly chosen perfect matching between the n-sets corresponding to the endpoints of the edge. Let XG be the number of perfect matchings in a random lift of G. We study the distribution of XG in the limit as n tends to infinity, using the small subgraph conditioning method.

We present several results including an asymptotic formula for the expectation of XG when G is d-regular, d ≥ 3. The interaction of perfect matchings with short cycles in random lifts of regular multigraphs is also analysed. Partial calculations are performed for the second moment of XG, with full details given for two example multigraphs, including the complete graph K4.

To assist in our calculations we provide a theorem for estimating a summation over multiple dimensions using Laplace's method. This result is phrased as a summation over lattice points, and may prove useful in future applications.

Type
Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Alon, N., Benjamini, I., Lubetzky, E. and Sodin, S. (2007) Non-backtracking random walks mix faster. Commun. Contemp. Math. 9 585603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Amit, A. and Linial, N. (2002) Random graph coverings I: General theory and graph connectivity. Combinatorica 22 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Amit, A. and Linial, N. (2006) Random lifts of graphs: Edge expansion. Combin. Probab. Comput. 15 317332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Amit, A., Linial, N. and Matoušek, J. (2002) Random lifts of graphs: Independence and chromatic number. Random Struct. Alg. 20 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Angel, O., Friedman, J. and Hoory, S. The non-backtracking spectrum of the universal cover of a graph. Preprint; available as arXiv:0712.0192v1 [math.CO].Google Scholar
[6]Burgin, K., Chebolu, P., Cooper, C. and Frieze, A. M. (2006) Hamilton cycles in random lifts of graphs. Europ. J. Combin. 27 12821293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Chebolu, P. and Frieze, A. M. (2008) Hamilton cycles in random lifts of complete directed graphs. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 22 520540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Greenhill, C., Janson, S., Kim, J. H. and Wormald, N. C. (2002) Permutation pseudographs and contiguity. Combin. Probab. Comput. 11 273298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Friedman, J. (2008) A proof of Alon's second eigenvalue conjecture. Memoirs Amer. Math. Soc. 195 no. 910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Horton, M. D., Stark, H. M. and Terras, A. A. (2008) Zeta functions of weighted graphs and covering graphs. In Analysis on Graphs and its Applications, Vol. 77 of Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., AMS, Providence, RI, pp. 2950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Janson, S., Łuczak, T. and Ruciński, A. (2000) Random Graphs, Wiley, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Linial, N. and Rozenman, E. (2005) Random lifts of graphs: Perfect matchings. Combinatorica 25 407424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Oren, I., Godel, A. and Smilansky, U. (2009) Trace formulae and spectral statistics for discrete Laplacians on regular graphs I. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 415101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]McMullen, P. (1984) Determinants of lattices induced by rational subspaces. Bull. London Math. Soc. 16 275277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Molloy, M. S. O., Robalewska, H., Robinson, R. W. and Wormald, N. C. (1997) 1-factorizations of random regular graphs. Random Struct. Alg. 10 305321.3.0.CO;2-#>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Robinson, R. W. and Wormald, N. C. (1984) Existence of long cycles in random cubic graphs. In Enumeration and Design (Jackson, D. M. and Vanstone, S. A., eds), Academic Press, Toronto, pp. 251270.Google Scholar
[17]Robinson, R. W. and Wormald, N. C. (1992) Almost all cubic graphs are Hamiltonian. Random Struct. Alg. 3 117125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Robinson, R. W. and Wormald, N. C. (1994) Almost all regular graphs are Hamiltonian. Random Struct. Alg. 5 363374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Schnell, U. (1992) Minimal determinants and lattice inequalities. Bull. London Math. Soc. 24 606612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar