Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-8gtf8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-26T06:35:13.700Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sumset and Inverse Sumset Theory for Shannon Entropy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2010

TERENCE TAO
TERENCE TAO*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, UCLA, Los Angeles CA 90095-1555, USA (e-mail: tao@math.ucla.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Let G = (G, +) be an additive group. The sumset theory of Plünnecke and Ruzsa gives several relations between the size of sumsets A + B of finite sets A, B, and related objects such as iterated sumsets kA and difference sets A − B, while the inverse sumset theory of Freiman, Ruzsa, and others characterizes those finite sets A for which A + A is small. In this paper we establish analogous results in which the finite set A ⊂ G is replaced by a discrete random variable X taking values in G, and the cardinality |A| is replaced by the Shannon entropy H(X). In particular, we classify those random variables X which have small doubling in the sense that H(X1 + X2) = H(X) + O(1) when X1, X2 are independent copies of X, by showing that they factorize as X = U + Z, where U is uniformly distributed on a coset progression of bounded rank, and H(Z) = O(1).

When G is torsion-free, we also establish the sharp lower bound , where o(1) goes to zero as H(X) → ∞.

Type
Paper
Information
Combinatorics, Probability and Computing , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , July 2010 , pp. 603 - 639
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Artstein, S., Ball, K., Barthe, F. and Naor, A. (2004) Solution of Shannon's problem on the monotonicity of entropy. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 17 975–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Balister, P. and Bollobás, B. Projections, entropy and sumsets. Combinatorica, to appear.Google Scholar
[3]Balog, A. and Szemerédi, E. (1994) A statistical theorem of set addition. Combinatorica 14 263–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Gowers, T. (1998) A new proof of Szemerédi's theorem for arithmetic progressions of length four. Geom. Funct. Anal. 8 529–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Green, B. and Ruzsa, I. (2007) Freiman's theorem in an arbitrary abelian group. J. London Math. Soc. 75 163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Gyarmati, K., Matolcsi, M. and Ruzsa, I. A superadditivity and submultiplicativity property for cardinalities of sumsets. Combinatorica, to appear.Google Scholar
[7]Madiman, M., Marcus, A. and Tetali, P. Entropy and set cardinality inequalities for partition-determined functions, with applications to sumsets. Preprint.Google Scholar
[8]Plünnecke, H. (1969) Eigenschaften und Abschätzungen von Wirkungsfunktionen. BMwF-GMD-22 Gesellschaft für Mathematik und Datenverarbeitung, Bonn.Google Scholar
[9]Ruzsa, I. (1996) Sums of finite sets. In Number Theory: New York Seminar (Chudnovsky, D. V., Chudnovsky, G. V. and Nathanson, M. B., eds), Springer.Google Scholar
[10]Tao, T. (2008) Product set estimates for non-commutative groups. Combinatorica (5) 28 547–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Tao, T. Freiman's theorem for solvable groups. Preprint.Google Scholar
[12]Tao, T. and Vu, V. (2006) Additive Combinatorics, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Tao, T. and Vu, V. (2008) John-type theorems for generalized arithmetic progressions and iterated sumsets. Adv. Math. 219 428–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar