Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:21:33.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis of Geometrically Consistent Schemes with Finite Range Interaction

Part of: Partial differential equations, boundary value problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2017

Hongliang Li  and
Pingbing Ming
Hongliang Li*
Affiliation:
Institute of Electronic Engineering, Microsystem and Terahertz Research Center, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang, 621900, China
Pingbing Ming*
Affiliation:
The State Key Laboratory of Scientific and Engineering Computing, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 55, East Road Zhong-Guan-Cun, Beijing 100190, China and School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
*
*Corresponding author. Email addresses:lihongliang@mtrc.ac.cn(H. L. Li), mpb@lsec.cc.ac.cn(P. B. Ming)
*Corresponding author. Email addresses:lihongliang@mtrc.ac.cn(H. L. Li), mpb@lsec.cc.ac.cn(P. B. Ming)
Get access

Abstract

We analyze the geometrically consistent schemes proposed by E. Lu and Yang [6] for one-dimensional problem with finite range interaction. The existence of the reconstruction coefficients is proved, and optimal error estimate is derived under sharp stability condition. Numerical experiments are performed to confirm the theoretical results.

Keywords

Quasicontinuum methodatomic-to-continuum couplingstabilityfinite range interactions

MSC classification

Secondary: 65N15: Error bounds 65N30: Finite elements, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods, finite methods
Type
Research Article
Information
Communications in Computational Physics , Volume 22 , Issue 5 , November 2017 , pp. 1333 - 1361
Copyright
Copyright © Global-Science Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Badia, S., Parks, M. L., Gunzburger, M., Bochev, P. B., and Lehoucq, R. B., On atomistic-tocontinuum coupling by blending, Multiscale Model. Simul., 7 (2008), 381–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Born, M. and Huang, K., Dynamical Theory of Crystal Lattices, Oxford University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
[3] Dobson, M., There is no pointwise consistent quasicontinuum energy, IMA J. Numer. Anal., 279 (2014), 29–45.Google Scholar
[4] Dobson, M. and Luskin, M., An analysis of the effect of ghost force oscillation on quasicontinuum error, ESAIM:M2AN, 43 (2009), 591–604.Google Scholar
[5] W. E, , Principles of Multiscale Modeling, Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
[6] W. E, , Lu, J., and Yang, J. Z., Uniform accuracy of the quasicontinuum method, Phys. Rev. B, 74 (2006), 214115.Google Scholar
[7] W. E, and Ming, P. B., Cauchy-Born rule and the stability of crystalline solids: static problems, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 183 (2007), 241–297.Google Scholar
[8] Houchmandzadeh, B., Lajzerowicz, J., and Salje, E., Relaxations near surfaces and interfaces for first-, second- and third-neighbour interactions: theory and applications to polytypism, J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 4 (1992), 9779–9794.Google Scholar
[9] Hudson, T. and Ortner, C., On the stability of Bravais lattices and their Cauchy-Born approximations, ESAIM:M2AN, 46 (2012), 81–110.Google Scholar
[10] Lennard-Jones, J. E., On the force between atoms and ions, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A, 109 (1925), 584–597.Google Scholar
[11] Li, X. H. and Luskin, M., Lattice stability for atomistic chains modeled by local approximations of the embedded atom method, Comput. Mater. Sci., 66 (2013), 96–103.Google Scholar
[12] Li, X. H. and Luskin, M., A generalized quasinonlocal atomistic-to-continuum coupling method with finite-range interaction, IMA J. Numer. Anal., 32 (2012), 373–393.Google Scholar
[13] Losonczi, László, On some discrete quadratic inequalities, Int. Ser. Numer. Math., 80 (1987), 73–85.Google Scholar
[14] Lu, J. and Ming, P. B., Convergence of a force-based hybrid method in three dimensions, Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 66 (2013), 83–108.Google Scholar
[15] Lu, Jianfeng and Ming, Pingbing, Stability of a force-based hybridmethod in three dimension with sharp interface, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 52 (2014), 2005–2026.Google Scholar
[16] Luskin, M. and Ortner, C., Atomistic-to-continuum coupling, Acta Numer., (2013), 397–508.Google Scholar
[17] Ming, P. B. and Yang, J. Z., Analysis of a one-dimensional nonlocal quasicontinuum method, Multiscale Model. Simul., 7 (2009), 1838–1875.Google Scholar
[18] Morse, P. M., Diatomic molecules according to the wave mechanics, II, Viberational levels, Phys. Rev., 34 (1929), 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19] Olson, D., Bochev, P. B., Luskin, M., and Shapeev, A. V., An optimization-based atomistic-to-continuum coupling method, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 52 (2014), 2183–2204.Google Scholar
[20] Ortner, C., A priori and a posteriori analysis of the quasinonlocal quasicontinuum method in 1D, Math. Comput., 80 (2011), 1265–1285.Google Scholar
[21] Ortner, C., Shapeev, A., and Zhang, L., (in-)stability and stabilization of QNL-type atomistic-to-continuum coupling methods, Multiscale Model. Simul., 12 (2014), 1258–1293.Google Scholar
[22] Ortner, C. and Theil, F., Justification of the Cauchy-Born approximation of elastodynamics, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 207 (2013), 1025–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23] Ortner, C. and Wang, H., A priori error estimates for energy-based quasicontinuum approximations of a periodic chain, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 21 (2011), 2491–2521.Google Scholar
[24] Ortner, C. and Zhang, L., Construction and sharp consistency estimates for atomistic/continuum coupling methods with general interfaces: a two-dimensional model problems, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 50 (2012), 2940–2965.Google Scholar
[25] Ortner, C. and Zhang, L., Energy-based atomistic-to-continuum coupling without ghost forces, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 279 (2014), 29–45.Google Scholar
[26] Parks, M. L., Bochev, P. B., and Lehoucq, R. B., Connecting atomistic-to-continuum coupling and domain decompositiong, Multiscale Model. Simul., 7 (2008), 362–380.Google Scholar
[27] Shapeev, A. V., Consistent energy-based atomistic/continuum coupling for two-body potentials in one and two dimension, Multiscale Model. Simul., 9 (2011), 905–932.Google Scholar
[28] Shapeev, Alexander V., Consistent energy-based atomistic/continuum for two-body potential in three dimensions, SIAMJ. Sci. Comput., 34(3) (2012), B335–B360.Google Scholar
[29] Shenoy, V. B., Miller, R., Tadmor, E. B., Rodney, D., Phillips, R., and Ortiz, M., An adaptive finite element approach to atomic-scale mechanics-the quasicontinuum method, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 47 (1999), 611–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[30] Shimokawa, T., Mortensen, J. J., Schiøtz, J., and Jacobsen, K. W., Matching conditions in the quasicontinuum method: Removal of the error introduced at the interface between the coarse-grained and fully atomistic region, Phys. Rev. B, 69 (2004), 214104.Google Scholar
[31] Tadmor, E. B., Ortiz, M., and Phillips, R., Quasicontinuum analysis of defects in solids, Philos. Mag. A, 73 (1996), 1529–1563.Google Scholar
[32] Van Koten, B. and Luskin, M., Analysis of energy-based bnended quasi-continuum approximations, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 49 (2011), 2182–2209.Google Scholar