Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T15:18:02.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Numerical Solution of Acoustic Scattering by an Adaptive DtN Finite Element Method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2015

Xue Jiang ,
Peijun Li  and
Weiying Zheng
Xue Jiang*
Affiliation:
LSEC, Institute of Computational Mathematics, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China
Peijun Li*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, 47907, USA
Weiying Zheng*
Affiliation:
LSEC, Institute of Computational Mathematics, Academy of Mathematics and System Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China
*
Email:jxue@lsec.cc.ac.cn
Corresponding author.Email:lipeijun@math.purdue.edu
Email:zwy@lsec.cc.ac.cn
Get access

Abstract

Consider the acoustic wave scattering by an impenetrable obstacle in two dimensions, where the wave propagation is governed by the Helmholtz equation. The scattering problem is modeled as a boundary value problem over a bounded domain. Based on the Dirichlet-to-Neumann (DtN) operator, a transparent boundary condition is introduced on an artificial circular boundary enclosing the obstacle. An adaptive finite element based on a posterior error estimate is presented to solve the boundary value problem with a nonlocal DtN boundary condition. Numerical experiments are included to compare with the perfectly matched layer (PML) method to illustrate the competitive behavior of the proposed adaptive method.

Keywords

65M3078A4535Q60Helmholtz equationDtN boundary conditionadaptive finite element methoda posteriori error estimate
Type
Research Article
Information
Communications in Computational Physics , Volume 13 , Issue 5 , May 2013 , pp. 1277 - 1244
Copyright
Copyright © Global Science Press Limited 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Adams, R., Sobolev Spaces, Academic Press, New York, 1975.Google Scholar
[2]Babuška, I. and Aziz, A., Survey Lectures on Mathematical Foundations of the Finite Element Method, in The Mathematical Foundations of the Finite Element Method with Application to the Partial Differential Equations, ed. by Aziz, A., Academic Press, New York, 1973,5–359.Google Scholar
[3]Bao, G., Li, J., Li, P., Wang, Z., and Wu, H., An adaptive finite element method with DtN boundary condition for the diffraction grating problem, preprint.Google Scholar
[4]Chen, Z. and Wu, H., An adaptive finite element method with perfectly matched absorbing layers for the wave scattering by periodic structures, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 41 (2003), 799–826.Google Scholar
[5]Chen, Z. and Liu, X., An adaptive perfectly matched layer technique for time-harmonic scattering problems, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 43 (2005), 645–671.Google Scholar
[6]Colton, D. and Kress, R., Integral equation methods in scattering theory, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1983.Google Scholar
[7]Colton, D. and Kress, R., Inverse Acoustic and Electromagnetic Scattering Theory, Second Edition, Springer, Berlin, New York, 1998.Google Scholar
[8]Engquist, B. and Majda, A., Absorbing boundary conditions for the numerical simulation of waves, Math. Comp., 31 (1977), 629–651.Google Scholar
[9]Gilbarg, D. and Trudinger, N., Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1983.Google Scholar
[10]Grote, M. and Kirsch, C., Dirichlet-to-Neumann boundary conditions for multiple scattering problems, J. Comput. Phys., 201 (2004), 630–650.Google Scholar
[11]Hagstrom, T., Radiation boundary conditions for the numerical simulation of waves, Acta Numerica (1999), 47–106.Google Scholar
[12]Hsiao, G.C., Nigamb, N., Pasciak, J.E., Xu, L., Error analysis of the DtN-FEM for the scattering problem in acoustics via Fourier analysis, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 235 (2011), 4949–4965.Google Scholar
[13]Ihlenburg, F. and Babuska, I., Finite element solution of the Helmholtz equation with high wavenumber part I: the h-version of the FEM, Computers Math. Applic., 30 (1995), 9–37.Google Scholar
[14]Ihlenburg, F. and Babusska, I., Finite element solution of the Helmholtz equation with high wavenumber part II: the hp-version of the FEM, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 34 (1997), 315–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Jerison, D. and Kenig, C., Unique continuation and absence of positive eigenvalues for Schrödinger operators, Ann. Math., 121 (1985), 463–488.Google Scholar
[16]Jin, J., The Finite Element Method in Electromagnetics, New York: Wiley, 1993.Google Scholar
[17]Kress, R., Minimizing the condition number of boundary integral operators in acoustic and electromagnetic scattering, Q. Jl. Mech. Appl. Math., 38 (1985), 323–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Li, J., An Adaptive Finite Element Method for 1D Diffraction Gratings, Nanjing University, Master Thesis, 2010.Google Scholar
[19]Monk, P., Finite Element Methods for Maxwell’s Equations, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2003.Google Scholar
[20]Nédélec, J.-C., naucoustic and Electromagnetic Equations Integral Representations for Harmonic Problems, Springer, 2000.Google Scholar
[21]Yu, D., The Natural Boundary Integral Method and Its Applications, Science Press & Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.Google Scholar