Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:54:32.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Further Study on Errors in Metric Evaluation by Linear Upwind Schemes with Flux Splitting in Stationary Grids

Part of: Partial differential equations, initial value and time-dependent initial-boundary value problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2017

Qin Li ,
Dong Sun  and
Pengxin Liu
Qin Li*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Aerodynamics, Mianyang, Sichuan, 621000, P.R. China National Laboratory of Computational Fluid Dynamics, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100191, P.R. China
Dong Sun*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Aerodynamics, Mianyang, Sichuan, 621000, P.R. China
Pengxin Liu*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Aerodynamics, Mianyang, Sichuan, 621000, P.R. China
*
*Corresponding author. Email addresses:qin-li@vip.tom.com (Q. Li), sund1986@foxmail.com (D. Sun), liupengxin2008@163.com (P. Liu)
*Corresponding author. Email addresses:qin-li@vip.tom.com (Q. Li), sund1986@foxmail.com (D. Sun), liupengxin2008@163.com (P. Liu)
*Corresponding author. Email addresses:qin-li@vip.tom.com (Q. Li), sund1986@foxmail.com (D. Sun), liupengxin2008@163.com (P. Liu)
Get access

Abstract

The importance of eliminating errors in grid-metric evaluation for high-order difference schemes has been widely recognized in recent years, and it is known from the proof by Vinokur and Yee (NASA TM 209598, 2000) that when conservative derivations of grid metric are used by Thomas, Lombard and Neier (AIAA J., 1978, 17(10) and J. Spacecraft and rocket, 1990, 27(2)), errors caused by metric evaluation could be eliminated by linear schemes when flux splitting is not considered. According to the above achievement, central schemes without the use of flux splitting could fulfill the requirement of error elimination. Difficulties will arise for upwind schemes to attain the objective when the splitting is considered. In this study, further investigations are made on three aspects: Firstly, an idea of central scheme decomposition is introduced, and the procedure to derive the central scheme is proposed to evaluate grid metrics only. Secondly, the analysis has been made on the requirement of flux splitting to acquire free-stream preservation, and a Lax-Friedrichs-type splitting scheme is proposed as an example. Discussions about current study with that by Nonomura et al. (Computers and Fluids, 2015, 107) have been made. Thirdly, for half-node- or mixed-type schemes, interpolations should be used to derive variables at half nodes. The requirement to achieve metric identity on this situation is analyzed and an idea of directionally consistent interpolation is proposed, which is manifested to be indispensable to avoid violations of metric identity and to eliminate metric-caused errors thereafter. Two numerical problems are tested, i.e., the free-stream and vortex preservation on wavy, largely randomized and triangular-like grids. Numerical results validate aforementioned theoretical outcomes.

Keywords

Upwind schemeflux splittingmetric identityfree-stream preservation

MSC classification

Secondary: 65M06: Finite difference methods
Type
Research Article
Information
Communications in Computational Physics , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , July 2017 , pp. 64 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © Global-Science Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Communicated by Kun Xu

References

[1] Visbal, M. R. and Gaitnonde, D. V., On the use of high-order finite-difference schemes on curvilinear and deforming meshes, J. Comput. Phys., 181(2002): 155–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Nonomura, T., Lizuka, N., Fujii, K., Freestream and vortex preservation properties of high-order WENO and WCNS on curvilinear grids, Computers and Fluids 39(2010): 197–214.Google Scholar
[3] Vinokur, M., Conservative Equations of Gasdynamics in Curvilinear Coordinate Systems, J. Comput. Phys., 14(1974): 105–125.Google Scholar
[4] Pulliam, T. H. and Steger, J. L., On implicit finite-difference simulations of three dimensional flow, AIAA 1978-10.Google Scholar
[5] Thomas, P. D. and Lombard, C. K., The Geometric Conservation Law-A Link Between Finite-Difference and Finite-Volume Methods of Flow Computation on Moving Grids, AIAA 1978-1208.Google Scholar
[6] Thomas, P. D. and Lombard, C. K.. Geometric Conservation Law and Its Application to Flow Computations on Moving Grids, AIAA J., 1979, 17(10): 1030–1037.Google Scholar
[7] Thomas, P. D. and Neier, K. L., Navier-Stokes Simulation of Three-Dimensional Hypersonic Equilibrium Flows with Ablation, J. Spacecraft and rocket, 1990, 27(2): 143–149.Google Scholar
[8] Vinokur, M. and Yee, H. C., Extension of efficient low dissipation high order schemes for -3D curvilinear moving grids, NASA Technical Memorandum 209598, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Thompson, J. F., Warsi, Z. U. A., and Mastin, C. W., Numerical grid generation, Elsevier Science Publishing, 1985.Google Scholar
[10] Gaitonde, D. V. and Visbal, M. R., Further development of a Navier-Stokes solution procedure based on high-order formulas, AIAA 1999-0557.Google Scholar
[11] Deng, X., Mao, M., Tu, G., Liu, H., Zhang, H., Geometric conservation law and applications to high-order finite difference schemes with stationary grids, J. Comput. Phys., 230(2011): 1100–1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Deng, X., Min, Y., Mao, M., Liu, H., Tu, G., Zhang, H., Further studies on geometric conservation law and applications to high-order finite difference schemes with stationary grids, J. Comput. Phys., 239(2013): 90–111.Google Scholar
[13] Abe, Y., Iizuka, N., Nonomura, T., Fujii, K., Symmetric-conservative metric evaluations for higher-order finite difference scheme with the GCL identities on three-dimensional moving and deforming mesh, ICCFD7-2012-280.Google Scholar
[14] Abe, Y., Nonomura, T., Iizukac, N., Fujii, K., Geometric interpretations and spatial symmetry property of metrics in the conservative form for high-order finite-differences schemes on moving and deforming grids, J. Comput. Phys., 260(2014): 163–203.Google Scholar
[15] Vinokur, M., An analysis of finite-difference and finite-volume formulations of conservation laws, J. Comput. Phys., 81(1989): 1–52.Google Scholar
[16] Cai, X. and Ladeinde, F., Performance of WENO Scheme in Generalized Curvilinear Coordinate Systems, AIAA 2008-36.Google Scholar
[17] Lele, S. K., Compact Finite Difference Schemes with Spectral-like Resolution, J. Comput. Phys., 103(1992): l6–42.Google Scholar
[18] Jiang, Y., Shu, C., and Zhang, M., Free-stream preserving finite difference schemes on curvilinear meshes, Methods and Applications of Analysis, 2014, 21(1): 001–030.Google Scholar
[19] Abe, Y., Lizuka, N., Nonmura, T., Fujii, K., Symmetric-conservative metric evaluations for high-order finite difference scheme with the GCL identities on three-dimensional moving and deforming mesh, Seventh International Conference on Computational fluid Dynamics, ICCFD7-2801, 2012.Google Scholar
[20] Zhang, H., Some important problems for high order accurate difference scheme solving gas dynamic equations, Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 11(1993): 347–356.(in Chinese)Google Scholar
[21] Gaitonde, D. V. and Visbal, M. R., High-order schemes for Navier-Stokes equations: algorithm and implementation into FDL3DI, AFRL-VA-WP-TR-1998-3060, 1998.Google Scholar
[22] Shu, C. W., High order weighted essentially nonoscillatory schemes for convection dominated problems, SIAM review, 2009, 51(1): 82–126.Google Scholar
[23] Nonomura, T., Terakado, D., Abe, Y., Fujii, K., A new technique for freestream preservation of finite-difference WENO on curvilinear grid, Computers and Fluids, 107(2015): 242–255.Google Scholar