Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T01:21:04.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Semi-Eulerian and High Order Gaussian Beam Methods for the Schrödinger Equation in the Semiclassical Regime

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2015

Shi Jin*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA
Hao Wu*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 10084, China
Xu Yang*
Affiliation:
Program in Applied and Computational Mathematics, Princeton University, NJ 08544, USA
*
Get access

Abstract

A novel Eulerian Gaussian beam method was developed in [8] to compute the Schrödinger equation efficiently in the semiclassical regime. In this paper, we introduce an efficient semi-Eulerian implementation of this method. The new algorithm inherits the essence of the Eulerian Gaussian beam method where the Hessian is computed through the derivatives of the complexified level set functions instead of solving the dynamic ray tracing equation. The difference lies in that, we solve the ray tracing equations to determine the centers of the beams and then compute quantities of interests only around these centers. This yields effectively a local level set implementation, and the beam summation can be carried out on the initial physical space instead of the phase plane. As a consequence, it reduces the computational cost and also avoids the delicate issue of beam summation around the caustics in the Eulerian Gaussian beam method. Moreover, the semi-Eulerian Gaussian beam method can be easily generalized to higher order Gaussian beam methods, which is the topic of the second part of this paper. Several numerical examples are provided to verify the accuracy and efficiency of both the first order and higher order semi-Eulerian methods.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Global Science Press Limited 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Bao, W., Jin, S. and Markowich, P. A., On time-splitting spectral approximations for the Schrödinger equation in the semiclassical regime, J. Comput. Phys., 175 (2002), 487524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Cerveny, V., Popov, M. M. and Psencik, I., Computation of wave fields in inhomogeneous media-Gaussian beam approach, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 70 (1982), 109128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Heller, E. J., Cellular dynamics: a new semiclassical approach to time-dependent quantum mechanics, J. Chem. Phys., 94 (1991), 27232729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Heller, E. J., Guided Gaussian wave packets, Accounts. Chem. Res., 39 (2006), 127134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[5]Hill, N. R., Gaussian beam migration, Geophys., 55 (1990), 14161428.Google Scholar
[6]Hill, N. R., Prestack Gaussian-beam depth migration, Geophys., 66 (2001), 12401250.Google Scholar
[7]Jin, S. and Osher, S., A level set method for the computation of multivalued solutions to quasi-linear hyperbolic PDEs and Hamilton-Jacobi equations, Commun. Math. Sci., 1 (2003), 575591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Jin, S., Wu, H. and Yang, X., Gaussian beam methods for the Schrödinger equation in the semi-classical regime: Lagrangian and Eulerian formulations, Commun. Math. Sci., 6 (2008), 9951020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Jin, S., Wu, H. and Yang, X., A numerical study of the Gaussian beam methods for one-dimensional Schrödinger-Poisson equations, J. Comput. Math., 28 (2010), 261272.Google Scholar
[10]Jin, S., Wu, H., Yang, X. and Huang, Z. Y., Bloch decomposition-based Gaussian beam method for the Schrödinger equation with periodic potentials, J. Comput. Phys., 229 (2010), 4869–4883.Google Scholar
[11]Leung, S. and Qian, J., Eulerian Gaussian beams for Schrödinger equations in the semi-classical regime, J. Comput. Phys., 228 (2009), 29512977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Leung, S., Qian, J. and Burridge, R., Eulerian Gaussian beams for high-frequency wave propagation, Geophys., 72 (2007), 6176.Google Scholar
[13]Liu, H. L. and Ralston, J., Recovery of high frequency wave fields for the acoustic wave equation, Multiscale. Model. Simul., 8 (2009), 428444.Google Scholar
[14]Liu, H. L. and Ralston, J., Recovery of high frequency wave fields from phase space based measurements, Multiscale. Model. Simul., 8 (2010), 622644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Motamed, M. and Runborg, O., Taylor expansion and discretization errors in Gaussian beam superposition, Wave. Motion., to appear.Google Scholar
[16]Popov, M. M., A new method of computation of wave fields using gaussian beams, Wave. Motion., 4 (1982), 8597.Google Scholar
[17]Ralston, J., Gaussian beams and the propagation of singularities, Studies in PDEs, MAA. Stud. Math., 23 (1982), 206248.Google Scholar
[18]Tanushev, N. M., Superpositions and higher order Gaussian beams, Commun. Math. Sci., 6 (2008), 449475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Tanushev, N. M., Engquist, B. and Tsai, R., Gaussian beam decomposition of high frequency wave fields, J. Comput. Phys., 228 (2009), 88568871.Google Scholar
[20]Tanushev, N. M., Qian, J. and Ralston, J. V., Mountain waves and Gaussian beams, Multiscale. Model. Simul., 6 (2007), 688709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Yin, D. and Zheng, C., Fourth order Gaussian beam and interface conditions for the one-dimensional linear Schrödinger equation with singular potentials, preprint.Google Scholar