Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:15:49.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Symmetric Direct Discontinuous Galerkin Method for the Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2017

Huiqiang Yue*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Systems Science, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
Jian Cheng*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Systems Science, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
Tiegang Liu*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Systems Science, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
*
*Corresponding author. Email addresses:yuehq@buaa.edu.cn (H. Yue), chengjian@buaa.edu.cn (J. Cheng), liutg@buaa.edu.cn (T. Liu)
*Corresponding author. Email addresses:yuehq@buaa.edu.cn (H. Yue), chengjian@buaa.edu.cn (J. Cheng), liutg@buaa.edu.cn (T. Liu)
*Corresponding author. Email addresses:yuehq@buaa.edu.cn (H. Yue), chengjian@buaa.edu.cn (J. Cheng), liutg@buaa.edu.cn (T. Liu)
Get access

Abstract

In this work, we investigate the numerical approximation of the compressible Navier-Stokes equations under the framework of discontinuous Galerkin methods. For discretization of the viscous and heat fluxes, we extend and apply the symmetric direct discontinuous Galerkin (SDDG) method which is originally introduced for scalar diffusion problems. The original compressible Navier-Stokes equations are rewritten into an equivalent form via homogeneity tensors. Then, the numerical diffusive fluxes are constructed from the weak formulation of primal equations directly without converting the second-order equations to a first-order system. Additional numerical flux functions involving the jump of second order derivative of test functions are added to the original direct discontinuous Galerkin (DDG) discretization. A number of numerical tests are carried out to assess the practical performance of the SDDG method for the two dimensional compressible Navier-Stokes equations. These numerical results obtained demonstrate that the SDDG method can achieve the optimal order of accuracy. Especially, compared with the well-established symmetric interior penalty (SIP) method [18], the SDDG method can maintain the expected optimal order of convergence with a smaller penalty coefficient.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Global-Science Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Communicated by Chi-Wang Shu

References

[1] Arnold, D.N.. An interior penalty finite elementmethod with discontinuous elements. SIAM J. Numer. Anal, 19(4):742760, 1982.Google Scholar
[2] Bassi, F., Crivellini, A., Rebay, S., and Savini, M.. Discontinuous Galerkin solution of the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes and k–ω turbulence model equations. Comput. Fluids, 34(4):507540, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Bassi, F. and Rebay, S.. A high-order accurate discontinuous finite element method for the numerical solution of the compressible Navier–Stokes equations. J. Comput. Phys., 131(2):267279, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Cao, W., Liu, H., and Zhang, Z.. Superconvergence of the direct discontinuous Galerkin method for convection-diffusion equations. Numer. Methods Part. Diff. Eqns., 2016.Google Scholar
[5] Cheng, J., Liu, X., Liu, T., and Luo, H.. A parallel, high-order direct discontinuous Galerkin method for the Navier-Stokes equations on 3D hybrid grids. Commun. Comput. Phys., to appear, 2017.Google Scholar
[6] Cheng, J., Liu, X., Yang, X., Liu, T., and Luo, H.. A direct discontinuous galerkin method for computation of turbulent flows on hybrid grids. Number AIAA-2016-3333, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Cheng, J., Yang, X., Liu, X., Liu, T., and Luo, H.. A direct discontinuous Galerkin method for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations on arbitrary grids. J. Comput. Phys., 327:484502, 2016.Google Scholar
[8] Cockburn, B.. Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Computational Fluid Dynamics. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2004.Google Scholar
[9] Cockburn, B., Gopalakrishnan, J., and Lazarov, R.. Unified hybridization of discontinuous Galerkin, mixed, and continuous Galerkin methods for second order elliptic problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal, 47(2):13191365, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Cockburn, B., Hou, S., and Shu, C.-W.. The Runge-Kutta local projection discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation laws. IV. The multidimensional case. Math. Comput., 54(190):545581, 1990.Google Scholar
[11] Cockburn, B., Lin, S.-Y., and Shu, C.-W.. TVB Runge-Kutta local projection discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation laws III: One-dimensional systems. J. Comput. Phys., 84(1):90113, 1989.Google Scholar
[12] Cockburn, B. and Shu, C.-W.. TVB Runge-Kutta local projection discontinuous Galerkin finite elementmethod for conservation laws. II. General framework. Math. Comp., 52(186):411435, 1989.Google Scholar
[13] Cockburn, B. and Shu, C.-W.. The local discontinuous Galerkin method for time-dependent convection-diffusion systems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal, 35(6):24402463, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] Cockburn, B. and Shu, C.-W.. The Runge–Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method for conservation laws V: Multidimensional systems. J. Comput. Phys., 141(2):199224, 1998.Google Scholar
[15] Douglas, J. and Dupont, T.. Interior penalty procedures for elliptic and parabolic Galerkin methods. In Computing Methods in Applied Sciences, pages 207216. Springer, 1976.Google Scholar
[16] Gautier, R., Biau, D., and Lamballais, E.. A reference solution of the flow over a circular cylinder at Re = 40. Comput. Fluids, 75:103111, 2013.Google Scholar
[17] Hartmann, R. and Houston, P.. Symmetric Interior Penalty DG Methods for the Compressible Navier–Stokes Equations I: Method Formulation. Int. J. Num. Anal. Model., 3(1):120, 2006.Google Scholar
[18] Hartmann, R. and Houston, P.. An optimal order interior penalty discontinuous Galerkin discretization of the compressible Navier–Stokes equations. J. Comput. Phys., 227(22):96709685, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19] Huang, H., Chen, Z., Li, J., and Yan, J.. Direct discontinuous Galerkin method and its variations for second order elliptic equations. J. Sci. Comput., (DOI 10.1007/s10915-016-0264-z):122, 2016.Google Scholar
[20] Liu, H.. Optimal error estimates of the direct discontinuous Galerkin method for convection-diffusion equations. Math. Comp., 84(295):22632295, 2015.Google Scholar
[21] Liu, H. and Yan, J.. The direct discontinuous Galerkin (DDG)methods for diffusion problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal, 47(1):675698, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22] Liu, H. and Yan, J.. The direct discontinuous Galerkin (DDG) method for diffusion with interface corrections. Commun. Comput. Phys., 8(3):541, 2010.Google Scholar
[23] Luo, H., Luo, L., Nourgaliev, R., Mousseau, V.A., and Dinh, N.. A reconstructed discontinuous Galerkinmethod for the compressible Navier–Stokes equations on arbitrary grids. J. Comput. Phys., 229(19):69616978, 2010.Google Scholar
[24] Peraire, J., Nguyen, N.C., and Cockburn, B.. A hybridizable discontinuous Galerkin method for the compressible Euler and Navier-Stokes equations. AIAA paper, 363:2010, 2010.Google Scholar
[25] Peraire, J. and Persson, P.-O.. The compact discontinuous Galerkin (CDG) method for elliptic problems. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 30(4):18061824, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26] Reed, W.H. and Hill, T.R.. Triangular mesh methods for the neutron transport equation. Los Alamos Report LA-UR-73-479, 1973.Google Scholar
[27] Shu, C.-W.. Different formulations of the discontinuous Galerkin method for the viscous terms. Advances in Scientific Computing, pages 144155, 2001.Google Scholar
[28] Toro, E.F.. Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics: A Practical Introduction. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.Google Scholar
[29] Vidden, C. and Yan, J.. A new direct discontinuous Galerkin method with symmetric structure for nonlinear diffusion equations. J. Comput. Math, 31(6):638662, 2013.Google Scholar