Article contents
The Beginnings of Bleeding-Heart Liberalism: Eugène Sue's Les Mystères de Paris
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 June 2009
Extract
Eugène Sue's novel Les Mystères de Paris created a stir when it appeared in 1842–43 in serial form in the daily Journal des Débats and in ten one-volume installments, plus a number of truncated and pirated editions. This rambling episodic work comprises over a dozen melodramas held together mainly by the direct or indirect involvement in them of the hero-savior Rudolph Grand Duke of Gerolstein, the miserly notary and arch villain Jacques Ferrand, the vulnerable sullied virgin Fleur-de-Marie, and the well-meaning aristocratic lady Clemence Marquise d'Harville. Longer than most serial novels, Les Mystères maintains its readers' interest with lurid exposés of Paris low life, heart-rending descriptions of the sufferings of the deserving poor, diabolical intrigues, knick-of-time rescues, and scenes of sex and violence at all social levels. Periodically the author interrupts his narrative with moralizing commentaries and proposals for social reform. Contemporary observers claimed that everyone from duchesses to house porters read Les Mystères de Paris for its sensationalism. It has also been argued that the book's working-class readers wrote so many letters to Sue urging him to stress the high moral qualities of his fictional workers—epitomized by the craftsman Jérome Morel—that their “collective constraint” transformed it from a book about the “dangerous” classes into a book about the laboring classes, and converted the author himself into a champion of their cause.
- Type
- The Press and the Liberal Mind
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1981
References
1 Chevalier, Louis, Classes laborieuses et classes dangereuses à Paris pendant la première moitié du XIXe siècle (Paris: Plon, 1958), 510Google Scholar; Bory, Jean-Louis, Eugène Sue: le roi du roman populaire (Paris: Hachette, 1962), 279.Google Scholar
2 Bory, , Eug' 'Die Geheimnisse von Paris” von Eugène Sue (Wiesbaden: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft Athenaion, 1977).Google Scholar
4 Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich, The Holy Family: A Critique of “Critical Critique” (Moscow: International Publishing House, 1956), 218–75.Google Scholar The original version of this material, published in 1845 in Die heilige Familie, is reprinted in Grubitzsch, , Materialen zur Kritik.Google Scholar
5 E.g., Bory, , Eugène Sue, 343.Google Scholar
6 Tudesq, André-Jean, “Un Organe gouvernemental: Le Journal des Débuts au temps de Guizot,” Politique, revue internationale des doctrines et des institutions (04–06 1959), 145Google Scholar; see also Aguet, J.-P., “Le tirage des quotidiens de Paris sous la Monarchie de Juillet,” Revue Suisse d'Histoire, 10 (1960), 247–51.Google Scholar According to both these scholars, the available records show that the circulation of the Journal rarely rose above 10,000 during the 1840s and consisted entirely of subscriptions from individual readers and public reading rooms; like most other newspapers of that time, the Journal des Debats was not sold in individual copies.
7 The works of Restif de la Bretonne. the Marquis de Sade, and Sébastien Mercier had been neither written for, nor read by, the bankers, stock brokers, academicians, and conservative officials and politicians at whom the Journal des Débats was aimed.
8 Eco, Umberto, “Rhetoric and Ideology in Sue's Les Mystères de Paris,” International Social Science Journal, 19:4 (1967), 562.Google Scholar
9 Sue, Eugène, Les Mysterès de Paris (Paris: Pauvert, 1963), 423–30.Google Scholar Unless otherwise indicated, all page references are from this complete modern edition. All translations are my own.
10 Ibid., 15, n. 2.
11 Ibid., 423.
12 E.g., Angenot, Marc, “Roman et idéologic: Les Mystères de Paris,” Revue des Langues Vivantes, 38 (1972), 409.Google Scholar
13 Geertz, Clifford, “Ideology as a Cultural System,” in Ideology and Discontent, Apter, David E., ed. (New York: Free Press, 1964), 64.Google Scholar
14 Bottomore, Tom, “Class Structure and Social Consciousness,” in Aspects of History and Class Consciousness, Meszaros, Istvan. ed. (London: Routleige & Kegan Paul, 1971), 57.Google Scholar
15 Duby, Georges, “Histoire sociale et idéologies des sociétés,” in Faire de I'histoire, Le Goff, Jacques and Nora, Pierre, eds., 3 vols. (Paris: Gallimard, 1974), I, 148–49.Google Scholar
16 Cunningham, Andrew, “Reflections on Projections: The Range of Ideology,” in Knowledge and Belief in Politics: The Problem of Ideology, Benewick, Robert et al. , eds. (London: Allen & Unwin, 1973), 42.Google Scholar
17 Habermas, Jürgen, Legitimation Crisis (Boston: Beacon Press, 1975), 82–83.Google Scholar
18 E.g., GraǬa, César. Bohemian Versus Bourgeois: French Society and the French Man of Letters in the Nineteenth Century (New York: Basic Books, 1964)Google Scholar; Clark, Priscilla P., The Battle of the Bourgeois: The Novel in France, 1789–1848 (Paris: Didier, 1973).Google Scholar
19 Clark, , Battle of the Bourgeois, 186.Google Scholar
20 Sue applied this belief to himself as well as toothers. At one point, he refers to Les Mystères as “cetteoeuvre … consciencieuse et impartiale.” Les Mystères, 260. In a letter to the editors of the Journal des Débats, published in the issue of 15 October 1843, Sue praises them for their “courageuse et loyale impartialité “ in publishing his ideas even though they disagreed with them.
21 Sue, , Les Mystères, 692–93, 697–98.Google Scholar
22 Steams, Peter N., Paths to Authority: The Middle Class and the Industrial Labor Force in France, 1820–1848 (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1978), 179–80.Google Scholar
23 Sue, , Les Mystères, 264.Google Scholar
24 The first version of this work, based on Cousin's famous lectures at the Collège de France, appeared in 1837. For his summary argument that there is an explanation for everything, see the 1886 edition of Du Vrai, du beau et du bien (Paris: Didier), 448–50.Google Scholar
25 Sue acknowledges this by noting that in a recent session of the legislature a proposal for establishing homes for workers crippled on the job elicited “a general and prolonged hilarity.” Les Mystères, 495.Google Scholar
26 See Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (New York: Pantheon, 1977), 231–56.Google Scholar
27 Sue, , Les Mystères, 223.Google Scholar
28 Ibid., 213.
29 Ibid., 2, n. 2. But Sue himself never mastered the subtleties of this argot, no matter how hard he tried. Commenting on the name Fleur-de-Marie, which was argot for The Holy Virgin, he says, “étrange hasard! les inventeurs de cette épouvantable langue se sont ainsi élevés à une sainte poésie.” He completely misses the brazen disrespect intended, which is comparable to that conveyed by “you mother!” in black ghetto English.
30 Belinski, V. G., “Die Geheimnisse von Paris—Eugen Sue in Russland,”Google Scholar in Grubitzsch, , Materialen zur Kritik, 225.Google Scholar
31 Sue, , Les Mystères, 707.Google Scholar
32 Ibid., 252.
33 See the paintings and drawings of Daumier, who also contributed many illustrations to the ten-volume edition of Les Mystères de Paris.
34 See Buret, Eugène, De la misère des classes laborieuses en Angleterre et en France, 2 vols. (Paris: Paulin, 1840)Google Scholar; Villermé, Louis René, Tableau de l'état physique et moral des ouvriers employés dans les manufactures de coton, de laine et de soie, 2 vols. (Paris: Renouard, 1840)Google Scholar; Frégier, Honoré-Antoine, Des classes dangereuses dans la population des grandes villes, 2 vols. (Paris: Baillière, 1840).Google Scholar Frégier was a police official, and Sue acknowledges the accuracy of his studies of the dangerous class (Les Mystères, 874n), but tries to counteract his contention that many workers were driven by their very natures into this class (Des classes dangereuses, I, 8Google Scholar). On working-class speech patterns, see Bruneau, Charles, Petite histoire de la langue française, 2 vols. (Paris: Colin, 1955)Google Scholar; and Bauche, Henri, Le Langage populaire (Paris: Payot, 1946).Google Scholar The laboring poor developed their first ideological consensus only during the Second Republic; see Merriman, John M., The Agony of the Republic. The Repression of the Left in Revolutionary France, 1848–1851 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1978), xxiv.Google Scholar
35 Sue, , Les Mystères, 50.Google Scholar
36 Ibid., 294.
37 Ibid., 288.
38 Ibid., 108.
39 Ibid., 124.
40 See the parable in ibid., 215–16.
41 See ibid., 114–11 for the chapter, “La Banque des Pauvres.”
42 Marx, and Engels, , The Holy Family, 261–63.Google Scholar
43 See Sue, , Les Mystères, 679–85 for the chapter, “La Force.”Google Scholar
44 Ibid., 708–11.
45 ibid., 681.
46 Journal des Economistes, 2 (1842)Google Scholar, cited in Foucault, , Discipline and Punish, 238.Google Scholar
47 Sue, , Les Mystères, 681.Google Scholar
48 Ibid., 494.
49 Ibid., 473.
50 Ibid., 494.
51 Sperber, Dan says the same thing vis-à-vis Balzac in Le Symbolisme en général (Paris: Hermann, 1974), 102.Google Scholar
52 Sue, , Les Myslères, 578.Google Scholar
53 Ibid.
- 3
- Cited by