We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Bagú, Sergio. 1961. “La estructuración económica en la etapa formativa de la Argentina moderna.” Desarrollo Económico, 1:2, 113–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique. 1977. “The Consumption of Dependency Theory in the United States.” Latin American Research Review, 12:3, 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique; and Enzo, Faletto. 1979. Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chirot, Daniel; and Hall, Thomas D.. 1982. “World-System Theory.” Annual Review of Sociology, 8, 81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, André Gunder. 1967. Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America: Historical Studies of Chile and Brazil. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Furtado, Celso. 1959. Formaçāo econômica do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Editôra Fundo de Cultura.Google Scholar
Love, Joseph L.1980. “Raúl Prebisch and the Origins of the Doctrine of Unequal Exchange.” Latin American Research Review, 15:3, 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prebisch, Raul. 1950. The Economic Development of Latin America and Its Principal Problems. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Stein, Stanley J.; and Stein, Barbara H.. 1970. The Colonial Heritage of Latin America: Essays on Economic Dependence in Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeitlin, Maurice. 1974. “Corporate Ownership and Control: The Large Corporation and the Capitalist Class.” American Journal of Sociology, 79:5, 1073–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar