Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:50:15.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Break-Up of the Poor Laws— German Style: Progressivism and the Origins of the Welfare State, 1900–1918

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2008

Larry Frohman
Larry Frohman
Affiliation:
Department of History, Stony Brook University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

While the 1834 New Poor Law and the controversies over its reform represent one of the central threads in every narrative of the history of modern Britain, the same can hardly be said of the German poor laws, whose history is far less known. This is due in large part to a historiographical tradition that sees the Bismarckian social insurance programs as the fons et origo of the German welfare state and thus marginalizes all forms of social assistance that can not be neatly fitted into the narrative pre-history or subsequent development of these programs. This contrasts with a British tradition where, as E. P. Hennock has recently argued, national insurance was primarily conceived as a means of poor law reform, and where the poor laws figure prominently in the historiography of the welfare state. On the other hand, this insurance-centered approach to the welfare state is not entirely to blame because, for their part, historians of poor relief have not been able to establish any positive connections between individualized, subsidiary, deterrent relief and social insurance or social security systems based on rights deriving from either contributions or citizenship.

Type
Research Article
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 50 , Issue 4 , October 2008 , pp. 981 - 1009
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hennock, , The Origin of the Welfare State in England and Germany, 1850–1914: Social Policies Compared (Cambridge University Press, 2007)Google Scholar.

2 Hong, Young-sun, Welfare, Modernity and the Weimar State, 1918–1933 (Princeton University Press, 1998)Google Scholar; and Föcking, Friederike, Fürsorge im Wirtschaftsboom: Die Entstehung des Bundessozialhilfegesetzes von 1961 (Oldenbourg, 2006)Google Scholar.

3 Outdoor assistance involved providing assistance, either in money or in kind, to people living in their own homes, rather than requiring supplicants to move into an institution, where authorities could more closely control their activities.

4 For an overview of the history and historiography of the nineteenth-century English poor laws, see Brundage, Anthony, The English Poor Laws, 1700–1930 (Palgrave, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kidd, Alan, State, Society and the Poor in Nineteenth-Century England (Macmillan, 1999)Google Scholar; and Himmelfarb, Gertrude, The Idea of Poverty: England in the Early Industrial Age (Knopf, 1984)Google Scholar.

5 The following comments on the organization of poor relief in Germany are based on my Poor Relief and Welfare in Germany from the Reformation to World War I (Cambridge University Press, 2008). See also Steinmetz, George, Regulating the Social: The Welfare State and Local Politics in Imperial Germany (Princeton University Press, 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sachße, Christoph and Tennstedt, Florian, Geschichte der Armenfürsorge in Deutschland, 3 vols. (Kohlhammer, 1980–1992)Google Scholar; and Marcus Gräser, Wohlfahrtsgesellschaft und Wohlfahrtsstaat: Bürgerliche Sozialreform und welfare state building in den USA und in Deutschland 1880–1940 (Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, forthcoming).

6 The most recent study of this crusade is Hurren, Elizabeth, Protesting about Pauperism: Poverty, Politics and Poor Relief in Late-Victorian England, 1870–1900 (Boydell, 2007)Google Scholar.

7 All of these programs employed—in different permutations and to varying degrees—enlightenment, conditional incentives, and social discipline to influence the behavior of their target populations. For an assessment of the emancipatory and disciplinary effects of these programs, see Frohman, Poor Relief and Welfare.

8 This and the following draw freely on Kloppenberg, James T., Uncertain Victory: Social Democracy and Progressivism in European and American Thought, 1870–1920 (Oxford University Press, 1986)Google Scholar; Stears, Marc, Progressives, Pluralists, and the Problems of the State: Ideologies of Reform in the United States and Britain, 1909–1926 (Oxford University Press, 2002)Google Scholar; McBriar, A. M., An Edwardian Mixed Doubles. The Bosanquets versus the Webbs: A Study in British Social Policy 1890–1929 (Oxford University Press, 1987)Google Scholar; Collini, Stefan, Liberalism and Sociology: L. T. Hobhouse and Political Argument in England 1880–1914 (Cambridge University Press, 1979)Google Scholar; and Freeden, Michael, The New Liberalism: An Ideology of Social Reform (Oxford University Press, 1978)Google Scholar.

9 Thompson, Alastair, Left Liberals, the State, and Popular Politics in Wilhelmine Germany (Oxford University Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tober, Holger, Deutscher Liberalismus und Sozialpolitik in der Ära des Wilhelminismus (Matthieson, 1999)Google Scholar.

10 Kloppenberg, Uncertain Victory, 321.

11 See especially Peukert, Detlev, Grenzen der Sozialdisziplinierung: Aufstieg und Krise der deutschen Jugendfürsorge 1878 bis 1932 (Bund Verlag, 1986)Google Scholar; Repp, Kevin, Reformers, Critics, and the Paths of German Modernity: Anti-Politics and the Search for Alternatives, 1890–1914 (Harvard University Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Dickinson, Edward Ross, The Politics of German Child Welfare from the Empire to the Federal Republic (Harvard University Press, 1996)Google Scholar.

12 Repp, Reformers, 215ff., citation 227; and Kevin Repp, “‘More Corporeal, More Concrete’: Liberal Humanism, Eugenics, and German Progressives at the Last Fin de Siècle,” Journal of Modern History 72 (Sept. 2000): 683–730. On the socio-economic background and political affinities of the left liberals, see Thompson, Left Liberals, 27ff.; and Sheehan, James, German Liberalism in the Nineteenth Century (University of Chicago Press, 1978), 241–43, 265–71Google Scholar.

13 Rodgers, Daniel, “In Search of Progressivism,” Reviews in American History 10, 4 (Dec. 1982): 113–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Atlantic Crossings: Social Politics in a Progressive Age (Harvard University Press, 1998), 52ff.

14 For the German debate on national efficiency and population policy, see Weipert, Matthias, “Mehrung der Volkskraft”: Die Debatte über Bevölkerung, Modernisierung und Nation 1890–1933 (Schöningh, 2006)Google Scholar.

15 Dickinson, The Politics of German Child Welfare, 6–7.

16 On the commission itself, see McBriar, An Edwardian Mixed Doubles; and Sidney and Beatrice Webb, English Poor Law History (=English Local Government) (Longmans, Green and Co., 1906–1929 [repr. 1963]), vol. 9, ch. 5.

17 Bernard Bosanquet, ed., Aspects of the Social Problem (London, 1895), Introduction, cited in McBriar, An Edwardian Mixed Doubles, 122–23.

18 Bosanquet, Bernard, “The Majority Report,” The Sociological Review 2, 2 (Apr. 1909): 109–26Google Scholar.

19 Ibid.: 120–22.

20 Bosanquet, Bernard, “Charity Organization and the Majority Report,” International Journal of Ethics 20, 4 (July 1910): 395–408, esp. 403CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 S. and B. Webb, English Poor Law History, 536.

22 Webb, Sidney, “The End of the Poor Law,” The Sociological Review 2, 2 (Apr. 1909): 127–39, citation 131Google Scholar.

23 Sidney and Beatrice Webb, eds., The Break-Up of the Poor Law: Being Part One of the Minority Report of the Poor Law Commission (Longmans, 1909), 515–16.

24 Sidney and Beatrice Webb, English Poor Law Policy (Cass, 1963), 360, cited in Vincent, Andrew, “The Poor Law Reports of 1909 and the Social Theory of the Charity Organisation Society,” Victorian Studies 27, 3 (Spring 1984): 343–63, citation 358Google Scholar.

25 S. Webb, “The End of the Poor Law”: 131–32.

26 Sidney and Beatrice Webb, The Prevention of Destitution (London, 1912), 297.

27 Collini, Liberalism and Sociology, 31–32, shows nicely how a more Idealist understanding of individual liberty served as the pivot for this maneuver.

28 S. and B. Webb, English Poor Law History, 495.

29 Ibid., ch. 6.

30 S. and B. Webb, eds., The Break-Up of the Poor Law, 541–42.

31 Ibid., 544.

32 S. Webb, “The End of the Poor Law”: 132.

33 S. and B. Webb, English Poor Law History, 495. In his commentary on the Minority Report, the New Liberal cum socialist Leonard Hobhouse rightly focused on this set of social rights and social obligations as the theoretical and political center of gravity of the Webbs' proposals. As he phrased it, “The problem comes to be not that of reducing public aid to a minimum by insisting on a destitution test, but that of freely developing public assistance in those forms which directly or indirectly bring an adequate return”—with both the greater cost to the public purse and the potential for greater infringement upon individual liberty both figuring into the new assistantial calculus. Hobhouse, “The State in Relation to Poverty,” Manchester Guardian (22 and 24 Feb., and 1, 4, 8, and 15 Mar. 1909). The citation is from the 1 March article.

34 S. and B. Webb, The Prevention of Destitution, 300.

35 Helen Bosanquet's criticism of the Fabian nanny state is cited in McBriar, An Edwardian Mixed Doubles, 298–99.

36 Collini, Liberalism and Sociology, 141.

37 Vincent, “The Poor Law Reports of 1909.”

38 S. and B. Webb, The Prevention of Destitution, 293, 301.

39 Thane, , “Women in the British Labour Party and the Construction of State Welfare, 1906–1939,” in, Koven, Seth and Michel, Sonya, eds., Mothers of a New World: Maternalist Politics and the Origins of Welfare States (Routledge, 1993), 343–77, citation 358–59Google Scholar.

40 Finlayson, Geoffrey, Citizen, State, and Social Welfare in Britain 1830–1990 (Oxford University Press, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

41 Flesch, Karl and Soetbeer, Adolf, Sociale Ausgestaltung der Armenpflege, Schriften des Vereins für Armenpflege und Wohltätigkeit (later für öffentliche und private Fürsorge [hereafter SDV]) 54 (1901>)Google Scholar; Stenographischer Bericht über die Verhandlungen, SDV 56 (1901), 28–63.

42 On the local conditions underlying the policies that Schwander was advocating here, see Silke Schütter, “Von der rechtlichen Anerkennung zur Ausgrenzung der Armen: Euphorie und Scheitern eines großen kommunalpolitischen Reformprojektes Straßurgs zwischen den 1880er Jahre und der 1920er Jahren,” Archiv für Sozialgeschichte 46 (2006); and Bénédicte Zimmermann, “Naissance d'une politique municipal du marché du travail: Strasbourg et la question du chômage (1888–1914),” Revue d'Alsace 120 (1994): 209–34.

43 Die heutigen Anforderungen an die öffentliche Armenpflege, SDV 73 (1905), 155–56.

44 Stenographischer Bericht über die Verhandlungen, SDV 75 (1905), 92.

45 Die heutigen Anforderungen an die öffentliche Armenpflege, SDV 73 (1905); and Stenographischer Bericht über die Verhandlungen, SDV 75 (1905).

46 Stenographischer Bericht über die Verhandlungen, SDV 75 (1905), 145–46.

47 This logic is laid out most clearly by Finlayson, in chapter 2 of Citizen, State, and Social Welfare in Britain.

48 Die heutigen Anforderungen an die öffentliche Armenpflege, SDV 73 (1905), 37ff.

49 Reulecke, Jürgen, “Formen bürgerlich-sozialen Engagements in Deutschland und England im 19. Jahrhundert,” in, Kocka, Jürgen, ed., Arbeiter und Bürger im 19: Jahrhundert (Oldenbourg, 1986), 261–85Google Scholar; and Hennock, E. P., “German Models for British Social Reform: Compulsory Insurance and the Elberfeld System of Poor Relief,” in, Muhs, Rudolf et al. , eds., Aneignung und Abwehr (Philo Verlag, 1998), 127–42Google Scholar.

50 The following comments are based on a series of articles that all appeared under the title “Die Reform des englischen Armenwesens,” Zeitschrift für das Armenwesen 10, 4 (Apr. 1909): 97–99; 10, 8 (Aug. 1909): 225–37; 10, 9 (Sept. 1909): 257–66 [on the Minority Report]; and 11 (1910): 291–98.

51 This ambivalence was also reflected in the reception of the Webbs' work by Helene Simon, whose own writings (especially on school meals) closely paralleled their reasoning, and Salomon, who insisted that even the most comprehensive preventive system could never fully obviate the need for such forms of individualizing assistance because there would always be a substantial number of persons who, due to character flaws and personal crises, would fall through the cracks of any such system. Salomon, “Das Problem der Armut,” Zeitschrift für das Armenwesen 13, 12 (Dec. 1912): 353–71.

52 Friedeberg, E. and Wronsky, Siddy, eds., Handbuch der Kriegsfürsorge im Deutschen Reich (Vahlen, 1917), 32–60Google Scholar.

53 Repr. in Friedeberg and Wronsky, Handbuch der Kriegsfürsorge, 42–43.

54 Interior Ministry circular (28 Aug. 1914), Bundesarchiv R43F 2411.

55 “Zusammenstellung der Grundsätze über die Anwendung des Gesetzes… (April 19, 1915),” Bundesarchiv RAdI 12091, Bl. 379.

56 See, for example, Heimatdank, Badischer, Bericht über die Sitzung des Badischen Landesausschusses der Kriegshinterbliebenenfürsorge am Samstag, 27. Oktober 1917 (Karlsruhe, 1918), 15–16Google Scholar; and Friedeberg and Wronsky, Handbuch der Kriegsfürsorge, 111.

57 Fischer, “Gemeinschaftsarbeit und Persönlichkeitspflege in der Jugendfürsorge,” in Deutscher Verein für Armenpflege und Wohltätigkeit, ed., Jugendämter als Träger der öffentlichen Jugendfürsorge im Reiche: Bericht über die Verhandlungen des deutschen Jugendfürsorgetages am 20. und 21. September 1918 in Berlin (Heymann, 1919), 11–25, citations 18–19.

58 Ruland, Heinrich, “Soziale Ausgestaltung der Armenpflege und Reichsgesetzgebung,” Zeitschrift für das Armenwesen 20, 1–3 (Jan.–Mar. 1919): 1–8, citation 4Google Scholar.

59 Polligkeit, Wilhelm, “Die Neuorientierung und Neugestaltung des Deutschen Vereins für Armenpflege und Wohltätigkeit,” Zeitschrift für das Armenwesen 20: 4–6 (1919): 106–16, citation 107Google Scholar.

60 Himmelfarb, Gertrude, Poverty and Compassion: The Moral Imagination of the Late Victorians (Random House, 1991), 384Google Scholar.

61 Hong, Welfare, Modernity and the Weimar State.