Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:52:04.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bureaucrats versus the State in Capitalist and Socialist Regimes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Richard Kraus  and
Reeve D. Vanneman
Richard Kraus
Affiliation:
University of Oregon and University of Maryland
Reeve D. Vanneman
Affiliation:
University of Oregon and University of Maryland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Resurgent scholarly interest in the state has focused attention on the growth and decline of state power: Samuel Huntington's emphasis on the importance of state making and state decay, James O'Connor's anticipation of the financial crises of large states, Immanuel Wallerstein's identification of strong states with core areas of the world economy, Charles Tilly's accounts of European efforts to create more powerful states, and Theda Skocpol's analysis of revolutions as attempts to restore the strength of weakened central regimes.

Type
Bureaucrats and State Building
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , January 1985 , pp. 111 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Huntington, Samuel P., Political Order in Changing Soeieties (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968).Google Scholar

2 O'Connor, James, The Fiscal Crisis of the State (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Wallerstein, Immanuel, The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century (New YorkAcademic Press,, 1974)Google Scholar; idem, The Capitalist World-Economy: Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979)Google Scholar; idem, The Modern World-System 11: Mercantilism and the Consolidation of the European World-Economy, 1600–1750 (New York: Academic Press,, 1980).Google Scholar

4 Tilly, Charles, The Formation of National States in Western Europe (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975).Google Scholar

5 Skocpol, Theda, States and Social Revolutions (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Nordlinger, Eric A., On the Autonomy of the Democratic State (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981), 20–21.Google Scholar

7 Kraus, Richard, Maxwell, William E. and Vanneman, Reeve D., “The Interests of Bureaucrats: Implications of the Asian Experience for Recent Theories of Development,” American Journal of Sociology, 85 (07 1979), 135–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Aberbach, Joel D., Putnam, Robert D. and Rockman, Bert A., Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981), 61–62.Google Scholar

9 Mills, C. Wright, The Power Elite (New York: Oxford University Press, 1956)Google Scholar; Domhoff, William G., The Higher Circles: The Governing Class in America (New York: Random House, 1970).Google Scholar

10 Lipsky, Michael, Street-Level Bureaucracy (New York: Russell Sage, 1980).Google Scholar

11 Poulantzas, Nicos, Political Power and Social Classes (London: New Left Books, 1968)Google Scholar; idem, Classes in Contemporary Capitalism (London: New Left Books, 1975).Google Scholar

12 Letter of 13 April 1866, quoted in Hat Draper, Karl Marx's Theory of Revolution. Part 1: State and Bureaucracy (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1977), 336.Google Scholar

13 Poulantzas, , Political Power and Social Classes, 333.Google Scholar

14 Ibid., 336.

15 Block, Fred, “The Ruling Class Does Not Rule: Notes on the Marxist Theory of the State,” Socialist Revolution, 33 (05–06 1977), 6–28.Google Scholar

16 Bruce-Briggs, B., New Class? (New Brunswick, N.J.: Transactions Press,, 1979).Google Scholar

17 Moynihan, Daniel Patrick, “Equalizing Education: In Whose Benefit?” The Public Interest, no. 29 (Fall 1972), 69–89.Google Scholar

18 Bruce-Briggs, B., The War against the Automobile (New York: Dutton, 1977).Google Scholar

19 Weaver, Paul H., “Regulation, Social Policy, and Class Conflict,” The Public Interest, no. 50 (Winter 1978), 45–63.Google ScholarPubMed

20 Wilson, James Q., “The Rise of the Bureaucratic State,” The Public Interest, no. 41 (Fall 1975), 77–102.Google Scholar

21 O'Connor, , Fiscal Crisis of State: Gabriel Kolko, Railroads and Regulation, 1877–1916 (New York: Norton, 1965)Google Scholar; idem, The Triumph of Conservatism (New York: The Free Press, 1967)Google Scholar; Weinstein, James, The Corporate Ideal in the Liberal State (Boston: Beacon Press, 1969).Google Scholar

22 Michels, Robert, Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy, Eden and Paul, Cedar, trans. (New York: The Free Press, 1962).Google Scholar

23 Djilas, Milovan, The New Class: An Analysis of the Communist System (New York: Praeger, 1957).Google Scholar

24 Konrad, George and Szelenyi, Ivan, The Intellectuals on the Road to Class Power, Arato, Andrew and Allen, Richard E., trans. (New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1979).Google Scholar

25 Geilner, Ernest, “The Pluralist Anti-Levellers of Prague,” Archive européenes de sociologie, 12:2 (1971), 312–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

26 Skocpol, , States and Social Revolutions.Google Scholar

27 Lewin, Moshe, “The Social Background of Stalinism,” in Stalinism: Essays in Historical Interpretation, Tucker, Robert, ed. (New York: Norton, 1977), 130.Google Scholar

28 Trotsky, Leon, The Revolution Betrayed: What Is the Soviet Union and Where Is It Going? Eastman, Max, trans., 5th ed. (New York: Pathfinder, 1936).Google Scholar

29 Kraus, Richard C., Class Conflict in Chinese Socialism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1981).Google Scholar

30 Quoted in Roy Medvedev, Let History Judge (New York: Vintage, 1973), 425 (Medvedev's emphasis).Google Scholar

31 Corrigan, Philip, Ramsay, Harvie and Sayer, Derek, “Bolshevism and the USSR,” New Left Review, no. 125 (01–02 1981), 55.Google Scholar

32 Bahro, Rudolf, The Alternative in Eastern Europe (London: New Left Books, 1978).Google Scholar

33 McNeal, Robert H., “Trotskyist Interpretations of Stalinism,” in Stalinism: Essays in Historical Interpretation, Tucker, Robert, ed. (New York: Norton, 1977), 37.Google Scholar

34 Ossowski, Stanislaw, Class Structure in the Social Consciousness (New York: The Free Press, 1963).Google Scholar