Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:15:37.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feudal Relationships and the Law: A Comparative Enquiry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Michael Saltman
Michael Saltman
Affiliation:
University of Haifa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This essay is no more than a preliminary endeavor to examine analogies between principles of land tenure in the recent history of an East African society and what appear to be strikingly similar principles that obtained in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries in England. If these analogies are demonstrable with a reasonable degree of plausibility, a useful framework of reference may be established within which some broader theoretical issues can be discussed. One such issue is that, given a degree of structural similarity between two or more social systems, there might be a corresponding equivalence in the logic of legal thought in response to a common object of litigation—in this particular case, the subject of land tenure.

Type
Land and Law
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , July 1987 , pp. 514 - 532
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bates, D. 1982. Normandy before 1066. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bohannan, P. 1957. Justice and Judgement among the Tiv. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, E. A. R. 1974. “The Tyranny of a Construct: Feudalism and Historians of Medieval Europe.” American Historical Review, 79:4, 1063–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, R. A. 1974. “Modern Role for Customary Justice: Integration of Civil Procedure in African courts.” Stanford Law Review, 76 (05), 1123–59.Google Scholar
Cohen, D. W. 1972. The Historical Tradition of Busoga. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1961. Anthropology and History. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Fallers, L. 1956. Bantu Bureaucracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fallers, L. 1969. Law without Precedent. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ganshof, F. L. 1964. Feudalism, 3d ed. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Gluckman, M. 1972. The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Goody, J. 1971. Technology, Tradition, and the State in Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, G. D. G., ed. 1965. The Treatise on the Laws and Customs of the Realm of England Commonly Called Glanvill. London: Nelson.Google Scholar
Holt, J. C. 1972. “Politics and Property in Early Medieval England.” Past and Present, no. 57 (11), 3–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jolliffe, J. E. A. 1961. The Constitutional History of Medieval England, 4th ed. London: Adam and Charles Black.Google Scholar
Kaplan, A. 1964. The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioral Science. Scranton, Pa.: Chandler Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Lyon, B. 1960. A Constitutional and Legal History of Medieval England. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Milsom, S. F. C. 1981. Historical Foundations of the Common Law, 2d ed. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Moore, S. F. 1972. “Law and Social Change: The Semi-autonomous Field as an Appropriate Subject of Study.” Law and Society Review (Summer), 719–46.Google Scholar
Nagel, E. 1952. “Some Issues in the Logic of Historical Analysis.” Scientific Monthly, 54 (03), 162–69.Google Scholar
Plucknett, T. F. T. 1956. A Concise History of the Common Law, 5th ed. Boston: Little Brown and Co.Google Scholar
Pollock, F., and Maitland, F. W. 1968. History of English Law, 2d ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rheinstein, M. 1954. Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Smith, D. N. 1972. “Man and Law in Urban Africa: A Role of Customary Courts in the Urbanization Process.” The American Journal of Comparative Law, 20, 223–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenton, F. M. 1961. The First Century of English Feudalism, 2d ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thorne, S. E. 1959. “English Feudalism and Estates in Land.” Cambridge Law Journal, n.s. 6, 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar