Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:23:18.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modernization Theory Revisited. A Review Article

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Ian Roxborough
Ian Roxborough
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Persistence of Local Interests
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , October 1988 , pp. 753 - 761
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bossen, T., “The Promise of Theory,” in Promise of Development, Klarén, P. and Bossen, T., eds. (Boulder, Westview Press, 1986).Google Scholar

2 By this I mean that “modern”for Weberians and Parsonians refers to the depersonalization of political and economic roles, and for Marxists it refers to the extension of market relations.

3 Tilly, Charles, ed., The Formation of National States in Western Europe (Princeton:Princeton University Press, 1975).Google Scholar

4 Mann, M., The Sources of Social Power (Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 This is a rather brief and apparently arbitrary definition of what is a much-disputed phenomenon. I believe it contains most of the essential elements of Bloch's, Marc definition in Feudal Society (London:Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1961).Google Scholar

6 Of course, it is always possible to argue that change is continuous and multifaceted, and that there are, in fact, no discrete stages in history. However, if we are to talk about development or modernization, there are a number of advantages to using a stages model. It focusses attention, for example, on the internal “logic”of social systems, and therefore on their internal contradictions and on the forces making for change. But if a stages model is adopted, the “big gap”problem must be resolved.

7 Warren, Bill, Imperialism: Pioneer of Capitalism (London:New Left Books, 1980).Google Scholar