Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:41:33.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The State and the Transformation of Political Legitimacy in East and West Germany since 1945

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Mary Fulbrook
Mary Fulbrook
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Recent German history has produced a remarkable succession of state forms: an empire riddled with internal social tensions, brought down by external defeat in a world war for which it bore a large degree of responsibility; an unstable and ultimately suicidal parliamentary democracy; a genocidal dictatorship which eventually collapsed, totally defeated by opponents of its expansionist and increasingly radical foreign and domestic plans; and, concurrently, two remarkably stable and enduring instances of quite different political types, liberal parliamentary democracy in the capitalist west, and “actually existing socialism” based in democratic centralism in the communist east. Compared to their respective Western and Eastern European neighbours, the Germans on both sides of the inner-German border are now sustaining and reproducing their respective political systems with remarkable efficiency. Put crudely, it seems that good Nazis have been turned into good democrats and good communists, respectively.

Type
Comparative Politics
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , April 1987 , pp. 211 - 244
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

I am grateful to the British Academy and the University of London for support in connection with this research.

1 The literature is immense. See, for example, Denitch, B., ed., Legitimation of Regimes (London: Sage, 1979)Google Scholar; Held, D. et al. , eds., States and Societies (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1983), pt. 5Google Scholar; Lipset, S. M., Political Man (London: Heinemann, 1960), ch. 3Google Scholar; Weber, M., Economy and Society (New York: Bedminster Press, 1968), I, ch. 3, and III, ch. 10 (particularly p. 946, on subjects' actions and orientations to official claims)Google Scholar; Gramsci, A., Prison Notebooks (London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1971)Google Scholar; the works of a range of neo-Marxists, particularly in the Frankfurt school tradition of critical theory; and the functionalist works of Talcott Parsons and his followers. And, for debates on the role of political culture, see, for example, Brown, Archie and Gray, Jack, eds., Political Culture and Political Change in Communist States, 2d ed. (London: Macmillan, 1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Brown, A., ed., Political Culture and Communist Studies (London: Macmillan, 1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 See Fulbrook, M., “Legitimacy and Domination: Aspects of ‘Herrschaft’ in Twentieth-Century Germany,” in London German Studies III, Stern, J. P., ed. (London: Institute of Germanic Studies, 1986)Google Scholar.

3 Kershaw, Ian, The Nazi Dictatorship (London: Edward Arnold, 1985), 34Google Scholar.

4 See also Fulbrook, M., “Solutions to German History? East and West Germany Compared,” Parliamentary Affairs, 40:1 (01 1987), 113–29Google Scholar.

5 Kershaw, Ian, Der Hitler-Mythos: Volksmeinung und Propaganda im Dritten Reich (Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlagsanstalt, 1980)Google Scholar.

6 Cf., for example, Schoenbaum, David, Hitler's Social Revolution (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1967)Google Scholar, and the somewhat different conclusions in Kershaw, Ian, Popular Opinion and Political Dissent in the Third Reich (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983)Google Scholar.

7 Cf., for example, Heinrich Himmler's speech to a group of SS officers at Posen, 6 October 1943, reprinted in Documents on Nazism, 1919–1945, Noakes, J. and Pridham, G., eds. (London: Jonathan Cape, 1974), 492–93Google Scholar. (Listen to the ambivalence and implicit admission of moral shame: “It was that tact which … made us never discuss it among ourselves, never speak of it. It appalled everyone, and yet everyone was certain that he would do it the next time if such orders should be issued and if it should be necessary.…Most of you must know what it means when a hundred corpses are lying side by side, or five hundred, or a thousand. To have stuck it out and at the same time … to have remained decent fellows, that is what has made us tough. That is a page of glory in our history which has never been written and must never be written.” (p. 492).)

8 See, for example, Bracher, K. D., The German Dictatorship (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1980), ch. 7Google Scholar; Stern, J. P., Hitler, The Führer and the People (London: Fontana, 1975)Google Scholar; Graml, H. et al. , The German Resistance to Hitler (London: Batsford, 1970)Google Scholar.

9 Peterson, E. N., The American Occupation of Germany: Retreat to Victory (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1978), 341Google Scholar.

10 Quoted in Peterson, , American Occupation, 225Google Scholar. Cf. also, for example, the “Stimmungsbericht des Regierungspräsidenten von Arnsberg, Fries, an den Oberpräsidenten von Westfalen, 14/12/45,” reprinted in Deutsche Geschichte 1945–1961: Darstellung undDokumente, Steininger, R., ed. (Frankfurt: Fischer, 1983), 91–97 (and 92–93, on worsening of mood)Google Scholar.

11 Quoted in Grosser, A., Germany in our Time (London: Pall Mall Press, 1971), 41Google Scholar.

12 Gritschneder, Otto, “Sackgasse Säuberung. Eine kritische Denkschrift zum zweiten Jahrestag des Inkrafttretens des Gesetzes zur Befreiung vom Nationalsozialismus und Militarismus vom 5. März 1946,” manuscript, privately reproduced and circulated (Passau, 1948), 37, 38Google Scholar.

13 Quoted in Niethammer, Lutz, Die Mitläuferfabrik. Entnazifizierung am Beispiel Bayerns (1972; Bonn: Verlag J. H. W. Dietz Nachf., 1982), 173Google Scholar. (My translation.)

14 Peterson, , American Occupation, 151Google Scholar.

15 On denazification, see, generally, Dotterweich, Volker, “Die ‘Entnazifizierung’” in Vorgeschichte der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Zwischen Kapitulation und Grundgesetz, Becker, J., Stammen, T., and Waldmann, P., eds. (München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1979)Google Scholar; Fürstenau, Justus, Entnazifizierung. Ein Kapitel deutscher Nachkriegspolitik (Neuwied and Berlin: Luchterhand, 1969)Google Scholar; Fitzgibbon, C., Denazification (London: Michael Joseph, 1969)Google Scholar.

16 On the churches and denazification, see, for example, Spotts, F., The Churches and Politics in Germany (Middletown: Wesleyan University Press, 1973), ch. 4Google Scholar; and, for sharp criticism of the Evangelical churches by a former member of the Confessing Church, Diem, Hermann, Kirche und Entnazifizierung (Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer Verlag, 1946)Google Scholar.

17 Süddeutsche Zeitung, 8 02 1946, p. 3. (My translation.)Google Scholar

18 Monthly Reports of the Military Governor of the U.S. Zone, no. 1 (08 1945), 16–17 (copy in Institut für Zeitgeschichte, Munich)Google Scholar.

19 Office of Military Government for Bavaria and Third U.S. Army Area, 12 1945–01 1946, “Political Intelligence,” 19 (copy in Institut für Zeitgeschichte, Munich)Google Scholar.

20 Süddeutsche Zeitung, 21 12 1945, p. 1Google Scholar.

21 Gg. Lorenz, , “Der unsterbliche Spiesser,” Süddeutsche Zeitung, 15 01 1946, p. 4Google Scholar. (My translation.)

22 Dotterweich, , “Entnazifizierung,” 147, taken from Fürstenau, Entnazifizierung, 227ffGoogle Scholar.

23 See, for example, Pronay, N. and Wilson, K., eds., The Political Re-education of Germany and Her Allies (London: Croom Helm, 1985)Google Scholar; Ebsworth, R., Restoring Democracy in Germany: The British Contribution (London: Stevens and Sons Ltd., 1960)Google Scholar; Hearndon, A., ed., The British in Germany: Educational Reconstruction after 1945 (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1978)Google Scholar.

24 See, for example, Undset, S., Die Umerziehung der Deutschen (1945; rpt. Konstanz: Südverlag, 1947)Google Scholar.

25 Cf. the comments in Niethammer, L., ed., “Hinterher merkt man, dass es richtig war, dass es schiefgegangen ist.” Nachkriegserfahrungen im Ruhrgebiet (Berlin and Bonn: Verlag J. H. W. Dietz Nachf., 1983), 28–29Google Scholar.

26 See, for example, Staritz, D., Geschichte der DDR 1949–1985 (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1985), ch. 1, sec. 1Google Scholar; Klessmann, Christoph, Die doppelte Staatsgründung (Göttingen: Vandenhoek and Ruprecht, 1982), ch. 3, secs. 2, 3Google Scholar.

27 Noelle, E. and Neumann, E. P., Jahrbuch der öffentlichen Meinung, vol. 1: 1947–1955 (Allensbach: Verlag für Demoskopie, 1956), 146Google Scholar.

28 Steininger, , ed., Deutsche Geschichte, I, 150Google Scholar.

29 On the GDR, see, for example, McCauley, M., The German Democratic Republic since 1945 (London: Macmillan, 1983)Google Scholar; Sontheimer, K. and Bleek, W., The Government and Politics of East Germany (London: Hutchinson, 1975)Google Scholar; Childs, D., The GDR: Moscow's German Ally (London: G. Allen and Unwin, 1983)Google Scholar.

30 On the Federal Republic, see, for example, Smith, G., Democracy in Western Germany (London: Heinemann, 1979)Google Scholar; Balfour, M., West Germany: A Contemporary History (London: Croom Helm, 1982)Google Scholar; and, for more critical views, Hirsch, J., “Developments in the Political System of West Germany since 1945,” in The State in Western Europe, Scase, R., ed. (London: Croom Helm, 1980)Google Scholar. On theories of democracy in capitalist society, see, for example, Miliband, R., The State in Capitalist Society (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1969)Google Scholar; Offe, C. and Ronge, V., “Theses on the Theory of the State,” reprinted in Classes, Power, and Conflict, Giddens, A. and Held, D., eds. (London: Macmillan, 1982)Google Scholar.

31 Grosser, , Germany, 74Google Scholar.

32 Staritz, , Geschichte der DDR, 24–36Google Scholar.

33 Noelle, and Neumann, , Jahrbuch, I, 125, 126Google Scholar.

34 Ibid., 277.

35 Verba, S., “Germany: The Remaking of Political Culture,” in Political Culture and Political Development, Pye, L. and Verba, S., eds. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1965)Google Scholar.

36 Noelle, E. and Neumann, E. P., Jahrbuch der öffentlichen Meinung, vol. III: 1958–1964 (Allensbach: Verlag für Demoskopie, 1965), 230Google Scholar.

37 Ibid., 8.

38 Conradt, D. P., “Political Culture, Legitimacy, and Participation,” in The West German Model, Paterson, W. and Smith, G., eds. (London: Frank Cass, 1981)Google Scholar; see also Conradt, D. P., The German Polity (New York and London: Longman, 1982), ch. 3Google Scholar.

39 Verba, , “Germany,” 169Google Scholar.

40 See for example Kolinsky, E., Parties, Opposition and Society in West Germany (London: Croom Helm, 1984Google Scholar), where they are included under Part Two, “Opposition and Society.”

41 Conradt, , “Political Culture,” 32Google Scholar.

42 Kolinsky, , Parties, 54, ch. 3Google Scholar.

43 Verba, , “Germany,” 148, 149Google Scholar.

44 Ludz, P. C., The GDR from the Sixties to the Seventies, Harvard Center for International Affairs, Occasional Papers in International Affairs, no. 26 (Cambridge, 1970), 72Google Scholar; Sontheimer, and Bleek, , Government and Politics of East Germany, 44–45Google Scholar; McCauley, , German Democratic Republic, 193Google Scholar. Cf. also Baylis, T., “East Germany: In Quest of Legitimacy,” Problems of Communism, 21 (1972), 46–55Google Scholar; Rudolph, Hermann, Die Gesellschaft der DDR—Eine Deutsche Möglichkeit? (München: Piper, 1972), ch. 5Google Scholar; and the somewhat dated and otherwise problematic, but fascinating, material in Schweigler, G. L., National Consciousness in Divided Germany (London: Sage, 1975), ch. 3Google Scholar.

45 Thomas, Rüdiger, Modell DDR: Die kalkulierter Emanzipation, 6th ed. (München: Carl Hanser Verlag, 1977), 68, 70Google Scholar.

46 Zimmermann, H., “Power Distribution and Opportunities for Participation: Aspects of the Sociopolitical System of the GDR,” in Policymaking in the German Democratic Republic, von Beyme, K. and Zimmermann, H., eds. (Aldershot: Gower, 1977), 77Google Scholar.

47 Weber, Hermann, “Der ‘sozialistische’ deutsche Staat?” in Bundesrepublik Deutschland und Deutsche Demokratische Republik: Die beiden deutschen Staaten im Vergleich, Jesse, E., ed., 3d ed. (Berlin: Colloquium Verlag, 1982)Google Scholar.

48 On elites, see, for example, Ludz, P. C., The Changing Party Elite in East Germany (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1972)Google Scholar; Baylis, T., The Technical Intelligentsia and the East German Elite (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974)Google Scholar; Neugebauer, G., Partei und Staatsapparat in der DDR (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Fulbrook, M., “Elites and Politics in the GDR,” manuscriptGoogle Scholar.

49 Mann, M., “The Social Cohesion of Liberal Democracy,” American Sociological Review, 35:3 (1970), 423–39, at 437CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Converse, P., “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics,” in Ideology and Discontent, Apter, D., ed. (New York: Free Press, 1964)Google Scholar.

50 Conradt, , “Political Culture,” 30Google Scholar. See, generally, the Allensbach volumes for the disproportionate numbers of politically uninterested or ignorant women, compared to men.

51 Zimmermann, , “Power Distribution,” 29Google Scholar.

52 Professor F. Loeser, speaking at a conference of the Association for the Study of German Politics, Nottingham, 16 February 1985. An abbreviated version of his talk is printed in ASGP Journal, special issue (Summer 1985), 34–40Google Scholar. The notion of “institutionalised schizophrenia” is taken up by M. Watson in the panel discussion (p. 46).

53 Zimmermann, , “Power Distribution,” 78–80Google Scholar; Strassburger, , “Economic System and Economic Policy: The Challenge of the 1970s,” in Policymaking, Beyme, and Zimmermann, , eds., 127Google Scholar.

54 “Imke,” in Eckart, G., ed., So sehe ick die Sache. Protokolle aus der DDR (Köln: Verlag Kiepenheuer and Witsch, 1984), 58. (My translation.)Google Scholar

55 On the Nischengesellschaft, see also, for example, Greiffenhagen, M., “Politische Kultur in beiden deutschen Staaten” in Die Frage nach der deutschen Identität (Düsseldorf: Landes-zentrale für Politische Bildung Nordrhein-Westfalen, 1985)Google Scholar; Volkmer, Werner, “Political Culture and the Nation in the GDR,” GDR Monitor, no. 11 (Summer 1984), 13–23Google Scholar (including a discussion of Gaus's usage of the concept).

56 On right-wing tendencies, cf. Kolinsky, Parties; on the Berufsverbot, see, for example, Smith, , Democracy, 204–7Google Scholar; for a critique of perceived tendencies in German democracy, see Cobler, S., Law, Order, and Politics in West Germany (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1978)Google Scholar.

57 On church/state relations in the GDR, see, for example, Dähn, H., Konfrontation oder Kooperation? Das Verhältnis von Staat und Kirche in der SBZ/DDR 1945–1980 (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1982)Google Scholar; Henkys, R., ed., Die evangelischen Kirehen in der DDR (München: Chr. Kaiser Verlag, 1982)Google Scholar; Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, , ed., Kirche und Staat in der DDR und in der Bundesrepublik (Bonn: Verlag Neue Gesellschaft, 1981)Google Scholar. On tensions in relation specifically to peace initiatives, see Ehring, Klaus and Dallwitz, Martin, Schwerter zu Pflugscharen (Hamburg: Rowohlt, RoRoRo, 1982)Google Scholar; Sandford, J., The Sword and the Ploughshare (London: Merlin Press, 1983)Google Scholar. For official East German views, see, for example, Panorama DDR, Redaktion “Aus erster Hand,” Christians and Churches in the GDR (Dresden: Verlag Zeit im Bild, 1980)Google Scholar; Honecker, Erich, “Unsere Zeit verlangt Parteinahme für Fortschritt, Vernunft und Menschlichkeit,” speech in Martin Luther und unsere Zeit. Konstituierung des Martin-Luther-Komitees der DDR (Berlin: Aufbau Verlag, 1980)Google Scholar.

58 I have explored these tendencies and tensions at greater length in Fulbrook, M., “Co-option and Commitment: Aspects of Relations between Church and State in the GDR,” Social History, 12:1 (01 1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

59 See, for example, Geary, Dick, “Social Protest in Western Germany after 1945,” in Contemporary German Studies, Occasional Papers no. 1, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow (1985)Google Scholar.

60 See, generally, Kolinsky, Parties; Balfour, West Germany; Habermas, J., Legitimation Crisis (Boston: Beacon Press, 1975)Google Scholar.

61 This paragraph is based on the analysis of Baring, A., Der 17. Juni 1953 (1965; Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlagsanstalt, 1983)Google Scholar. See also Steininger, , Deutsche Geschichte, II, ch. 17Google Scholar.

62 See, for example, Loeser's speculations on the possible preparations for a military dictatorship in the GDR on Polish lines (speculations which appear to an outsider somewhat farfetched, given the differences between the East German and Polish situations), in ASGP Journal (Summer 1985), 39, 40, 53Google Scholar.